https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #9 from Ian Hattendorf ---
I'm not sure. Unfortunately I don't have time anymore to maintain this package.
Is there an orphaned status for packages that aren't yet approved, or should I
close it?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #8 from Niccolò Belli ---
I tried your package but it doesn't build on Fedora 30 ppc64le. Does it build
on COPR?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #7 from Miroslav Suchý ---
Ok. I overlooked that. No need for change then. When manual.md contains mix of
normal documentation and license, then leave it as %doc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #6 from Ian Hattendorf ---
(In reply to Miroslav Suchý from comment #5)
> Please see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/
> LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msu...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #4 from Ian Hattendorf ---
Great, thank you.
I've changed -doc to noarch and added a comment with the description from the
architecture build failures section since the package is still under review.
After
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
To be honest, I did not know that rule, proceed as before then.
Also for the ExcludeArch, please follow this guideline:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
--- Comment #2 from Ian Hattendorf ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - This shouldn't be needed, instead make your devel subpackage noarch.
>
> # Header only library
> %global debug_package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1554050
Ian Hattendorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
12 matches
Mail list logo