[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2020-04-01 00:17:21



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.

--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-4f421b75d0 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-4f421b75d0`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-4f421b75d0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c4844514fd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-92c812f0b5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinx-press-theme

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #14 from José Matos  ---
Thank you for the review. :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD (unspecified)", "Expat License".
 26 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1815154-python-sphinx-press-
 theme/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
 packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
 versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
 use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
 publishes signatures.
 

[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #12 from José Matos  ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #10)
>
> Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme.spec
> SRPM URL: 
> https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme-0.5.1-4.fc32.src.rpm

Hi Fabian, is there any issue that you would like to get addressed in the last
version?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter  ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #9)
> However, even without the slashes, it contains the entire directory and the
> content in it.

Looks like that I missed that changes or was mixing up things.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #10 from José Matos  ---
Actually I had at the header:

%{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}

and then later:

Source0:  %{pypi_source}

There is new version with a working pypy_source:

Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme-0.5.1-4.fc32.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok  ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #8)
> (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #6)
> > (In reply to José Matos from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #4)
> > > > - Wrong URL, it's the other one ;-)
> > > > 
> > > >   URL:https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
> > > >   Source0:%{pypi_source}
> > > 
> > > Actually it is not possible because the source and pypi names are 
> > > different:
> > > 
> > > sphinx_press_theme <- source name
> > > sphinx-press-theme <- pypi name
> > 
> > %{pypi_source} can take multiple argument ->
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> > #_source_files_from_pypi
> > 
> > Could work with  %{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}
> 
> Thanks for the reminder, that is neat.
> Yet when I did that change and rebuilt the rpm I got:
> 
> $ rpmbuild -ba python-sphinx-press-theme.spec 
> error: line 2: Unknown tag:
> https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_press_theme/
> sphinx_press_theme-%version.tar.gz
> 
> The %version was not expanded. I am using Fedora 32.
> 
> @Miro: was this to be expected?


This is missing the Source tag, you need something like:

Source0: %{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}


> > > > - The package must own the directories that are created.
> > > > 
> > > >   %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
> > > >  
> > > > %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-
> > > > info/
> > > 
> > > But it is already there. By placing the directory name with the final 
> > > slash
> > > (/) it means the directory and all its files.
> > 
> > See
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes
> 
> I understand and share you concern regarding unowned directories but the
> page above does not warn about the usage done in the spec.
> 
> If I remember correctly (I can be wrong naturally) this line in %files
> %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme
> 
> is equivalent to
> %dir %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme
> %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
> 
> I even tried to install and remove the corresponding rpm and the directories
> are correctly removed when the package is uninstalled.

The trailing slashes are optional. However I consider them better: It is clear
that it is a directory (and the build fails if it is not a directory).

However, even without the slashes, it contains the entire directory and the
content in it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #8 from José Matos  ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #6)
> (In reply to José Matos from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #4)
> > > - Wrong URL, it's the other one ;-)
> > > 
> > >   URL:https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
> > >   Source0:%{pypi_source}
> > 
> > Actually it is not possible because the source and pypi names are different:
> > 
> > sphinx_press_theme <- source name
> > sphinx-press-theme <- pypi name
> 
> %{pypi_source} can take multiple argument ->
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/
> #_source_files_from_pypi
> 
> Could work with  %{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}

Thanks for the reminder, that is neat.
Yet when I did that change and rebuilt the rpm I got:

$ rpmbuild -ba python-sphinx-press-theme.spec 
error: line 2: Unknown tag:
https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_press_theme/sphinx_press_theme-%version.tar.gz

The %version was not expanded. I am using Fedora 32.

@Miro: was this to be expected?

> > > - The package must own the directories that are created.
> > > 
> > >   %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
> > >  
> > > %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-
> > > info/
> > 
> > But it is already there. By placing the directory name with the final slash
> > (/) it means the directory and all its files.
> 
> See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes

I understand and share you concern regarding unowned directories but the page
above does not warn about the usage done in the spec.

If I remember correctly (I can be wrong naturally) this line in %files
%{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme

is equivalent to
%dir %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme
%{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/

I even tried to install and remove the corresponding rpm and the directories
are correctly removed when the package is uninstalled.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mhron...@redhat.com



--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Fabian, what directories the package doesn't own but should?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1815489 |



--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter  ---
(In reply to José Matos from comment #5)
> (In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #4)
> > - Wrong URL, it's the other one ;-)
> > 
> >   URL:https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
> >   Source0:%{pypi_source}
> 
> Actually it is not possible because the source and pypi names are different:
> 
> sphinx_press_theme <- source name
> sphinx-press-theme <- pypi name

%{pypi_source} can take multiple argument ->
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_source_files_from_pypi

Could work with  %{pypi_source sphinx_press_theme}

> > - The package must own the directories that are created.
> > 
> >   %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
> >  
> > %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-
> > info/
> 
> But it is already there. By placing the directory name with the final slash
> (/) it means the directory and all its files.

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UnownedDirectories#Common_Mistakes


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815489
[Bug 1815489] python-doit fails to build in rawhide: ThemeError: no theme named
'press' found (missing theme.conf?)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1815489




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815489
[Bug 1815489] python-doit fails to build in rawhide: ThemeError: no theme named
'press' found (missing theme.conf?)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #5 from José Matos  ---
(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #4)
> - Wrong URL, it's the other one ;-)
> 
>   URL:https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
>   Source0:%{pypi_source}

Actually it is not possible because the source and pypi names are different:

sphinx_press_theme <- source name
sphinx-press-theme <- pypi name

Note the difference between them by swapping the underscores by dashes.

> - From my point of view both licenses must be mentioned ->
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios
> 
>   License:MIT and BSD

You are right and I have added in the new spec.

> - The package must own the directories that are created.
> 
>   %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
>  
> %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-
> info/

But it is already there. By placing the directory name with the final slash (/)
it means the directory and all its files.
One reference I found
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57385249/in-an-rpm-files-section-is-it-possible-to-specify-a-directory-and-all-of-its-fi

Searching more in detail I found it:
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list.html

while the first paragraph here clearly states that placing the name of the
directory includes the directory and all its files:
http://ftp.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html#S3-RPM-INSIDE-DIR-DIRECTIVE

Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinx-press-theme-0.5.1-3.fc32.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter  ---
- Wrong URL, it's the other one ;-)

  URL:https://schettino72.github.io/sphinx_press_site/
  Source0:%{pypi_source}

- From my point of view both licenses must be mentioned ->
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_multiple_licensing_scenarios

  License:MIT and BSD

- The package must own the directories that are created.

  %{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme/
 
%{python3_sitelib}/sphinx_press_theme-%{version}-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154



--- Comment #3 from José Matos  ---
Thanks Fabian for taking the review.

(In reply to Fabian Affolter from comment #2)
> - The URL in Source0: could be replaced with %{pypi_source}

Done.

> - Please remove the formatting from %description

Sure.

> - For python3dist(sphinx) >= 2.0.0 the restriction can be removed as F31,
> F32 and Rawhide already are shipping more recent releases.

Actually I removed the manual provided Requires since they will be
autogenerated.

> - Fix the ownership in the %files section please.

What do you mean here? I searched the the generated rpm and I do not see any
problem in the ownership of the files. Apologies if this question looks dumb
but I am at loss here. :-)

> - License file is missing. Get in touch with upstream about the addition of
> it.
> - Some files are licensed under BSD

You are right.
There is already and issue open at the project 
https://github.com/schettino72/sphinx_press_theme/issues/32

New spec file and srpm below:

Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jamatos/nikola-playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01312124-python-sphinx-press-theme/python-sphinx-press-theme.spec
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jamatos/nikola-playground/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01312124-python-sphinx-press-theme/python-sphinx-press-theme-0.5.1-2.fc33.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter  ---
- The URL in Source0: could be replaced with %{pypi_source}
- Please remove the formatting from %description
- For python3dist(sphinx) >= 2.0.0 the restriction can be removed as F31, F32
and Rawhide already are shipping more recent releases.
- Fix the ownership in the %files section please.
- License file is missing. Get in touch with upstream about the addition of it.
- Some files are licensed under BSD

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

Fabian Affolter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|m...@fabian-affolter.ch
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from José Matos  ---
FWIW I have updated the description in the spec file to be the same as the one
above.

This package is required to update python-doit to the latest version. It is
used to build its documentation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1815154] Review Request: python-sphinx-press-theme - A Sphinx-doc theme based on Vuepress

2020-03-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815154

José Matos  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1782357




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782357
[Bug 1782357] python-doit-0.32.0 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org