[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2021-05-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST --- Comment #18 from Andy Mender

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2021-05-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #17 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Updated to 1.2.0, spec url: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2021-04-07 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #16 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Yesterday, I tried to build the RPM for OpenSuse with my SPEC, and I found two mistakes. First, I think that: > Requires: python3dist(pyusb) > Requires: python3dist(pyserial) is wrong. In guidelines

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2021-04-05 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #15 from c...@luigifab.fr --- At the same time, I was sponsored for another packages (awf-gtk2 & awf-gtk3), can I request-repo for this package and remove Blocks:FE-NEEDSPONSOR? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2021-04-04 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #14 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Hi, I updated to version 1.1.0 (https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec). Koji rebuild: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65107789

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-12-06 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 c...@luigifab.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #12 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Wow, sorry, I did not read correctly your suggestion for Source0, I changed. I also removed the change of the README in spec. I will prepare a section in the original README soon. I rebuilded: Spec

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-22 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #11 from Andy Mender --- > URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader > Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz I see the Source0 field is still the same. One of the reasons "%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz" is

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-19 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #10 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Okay, why not. Here is new build (I also updated my other packages in same way): Spec URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #9 from Andy Mender --- > I'm confused because this archive doesn't include Source1 and Source2. There are actually 2 archives: - generated explicitly:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #8 from c...@luigifab.fr --- When you say the "source tarball", is it? > URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader > Source0: %{url}/releases/download/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz =

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #7 from Andy Mender --- > Source1: %{url}/raw/v%{version}/debian/udev > Source2: %{url}/raw/v%{version}/README.md I had a look at the source tarball again and you don't actually have to attach additional sources with

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #6 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Okay, I found a way. Spec URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-17 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #5 from c...@luigifab.fr --- You are so right! I fixed. I rebuilded. I updated. Spec URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #4 from Andy Mender --- The SPEC file looks a lot better now! Good job! :) > BuildRequires: python3-devel > Requires: python3 > Requires: %{py3_dist pyusb} I think the last line should be: > Requires: python3dist(pyusb) Have a

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #3 from c...@luigifab.fr --- I read more docs, and yes, Source1 is a good idea. I updated the main repository. Spec URL: https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/raw/master/fedora/python-radexreader.spec SRPM URL:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #2 from c...@luigifab.fr --- Hum, ok, so my spec is very bad... Here is a new ones. Spec URL:

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 --- Comment #1 from Andy Mender --- > Spec URL: > https://github.com/luigifab/python-radexreader/blob/master/fedora/python3-radexreader.spec When linking a SPEC file, please point the URL to the raw content. Also, the SPEC file should be

[Bug 1896742] Review Request: python3-radexreader - Reader for the RADEX RD1212 Geiger counter

2020-11-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1896742 Andy Mender changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|