Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Bug 766166 depends on bug 761619, which changed state.
Bug 761619 Summary: Review Request: cross-binutils - Multiple cross-build
binutils
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619
What|Removed
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Jiri Kastner jkast...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jkast...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #20 from Jiri Kastner jkast...@redhat.com ---
another requirement is binutils = 2.20.51.0.2-12, in RHEL6 is 2.20.51.0.2-5.
gcc says nothing, when binutils is same version but older release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #21 from Jiri Kastner jkast...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 606258
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=606258action=edit
spec file for RHEL6 compilation
spec file with change for RHEL6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #18 from Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I may be a bit off here, but I don't think we need any libc to build libgcc and
I agree that it's not a good idea to add any userspace to this compiler
package.
But
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #17 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
So my question is: what would it take or is it even feasable to provide a
cross-libgcc along with the cross-gcc and cross-binutils packages? This
would make
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #14 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2012-05-17 04:28:15 EDT ---
In theory building libgcc could be matter of simply
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #15 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2012-05-17 07:19:00 EDT ---
OK, only 3 issues found
- ia64 - needs stdlib.h,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #16 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2012-05-17 09:08:07 EDT ---
Created attachment 585215
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2012-03-23 08:16:06 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-22 08:32:49 EDT
---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #3 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-03-21 11:26:06 EDT
---
Created attachment 571743
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #4 from David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org 2012-03-21 12:15:53
EDT ---
Lots of rpmlint warnings about stuff being
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #5 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-03-21 14:25:07 EDT
---
Okay. New versions uploaded:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #2 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-03-15 14:06:33 EDT
---
I've updated to gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 and
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
--- Comment #1 from David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com 2012-01-10 18:35:41 EST
---
I've fixed the warnings that can be fixed; I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=766166
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
26 matches
Mail list logo
