https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Bug 804125 depends on bug 1293160, which changed state.
Bug 1293160 Summary: Re-enable building on armv7hl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293160
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #84 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #82 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #81 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1903e53093
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #78 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0a6d8b86c1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #77 from Fedora Update System ---
rdkit-2016.03.2-6.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f9a7c78c30
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #76 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rdkit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1293160
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #73 from Antonio Trande ---
> - These are commands for Python3 builds but are not conditionalized
Sorry, i meant without conditional macro.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #72 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
- These are commands for Python3 builds but are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #71 from Rex Dieter ---
A strong and not-so-humble suggestion (for reviewer and non-reviewer commenters
mostly): please focus on strict review blockers (those documented in package
review guidelines. One
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #70 from Gianluca Sforna ---
I used the suggestion from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency
and added the linker flag in:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #69 from Paul Emsley ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #68)
> Another iteration at:
> https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
> https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2016.03.2-5.fc23.src.rpm
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #68 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Another iteration at:
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2016.03.2-5.fc23.src.rpm
I fixed the rpath for the cartridge and the removed the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #67 from Antonio Trande ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues
==
- Remove rpath contained
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #66 from Paul Emsley ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #65)
> >
> > Skip the test?
>
> yep, I did it and prepared a new package
Good stuff.
>
> https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #65 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Paul Emsley from comment #64)
> I'd say that it is (very) esoteric. Are you sure that you need to run the
> testPgSQL test? It seems to me more of a test of your
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #64 from Paul Emsley ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #63)
> does anyone know if it is
> possible to use pg_regress on the buildsystem chroot?
I do not know if it's possible. It doesn't seem like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #63 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Thanks Paul, I actually added ifdef on %arm to disable the RDK_OPTIMIZE_NATIVE
flag and managed to fix another issue with the postgresql cartridge build,
switching to cmake also for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Paul Emsley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pems...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #61 from Rex Dieter ---
Failure was some custom/incompatible compiler flag apparently:
cc1plus: error: unrecognized command line option '-mpopcnt'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #60 from Antonio Trande ---
Still failed on arm:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15129093
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #59 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #58)
> BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended
> and maybe also:
> BuildRequires: texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
> as a starting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Bug 804125 depends on bug 1358725, which changed state.
Bug 1358725 Summary: Fix auto-pointer registration in Boost Python 1.60
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358725
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #58 from Rex Dieter ---
I'd recommend trying:
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-latexrecommended
and maybe also:
BuildRequires: texlive-collection-fontsrecommended
as a starting point.
Then, for any missing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #57 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #56)
>
> BuildRequires: /usr/bin/pdflatex
Yep, I tried it but just uncovered a whole lot of more missing texlive parts,
fonts and stuff...
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #56 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #55)
> ok, it seems rawhide has either a different split of the texlive packages or
> (more probably) the dependencies between them changed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #55 from Gianluca Sforna ---
ok, it seems rawhide has either a different split of the texlive packages or
(more probably) the dependencies between them changed so I need to find out
what I really need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #54 from Antonio Trande ---
Fedora rawhide-i386.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #53 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #52)
>
> Gianluca, 'pdflatex' is still a missing command.
In which distro/arch? As stated above, mock build is fine.
BTW, thanks a lot for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #52 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #46)
> I prepared an updated spec/srpm for the latest version.
>
> It builds in mock for F23, but fails its test suite in F24 (and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1358725
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #51 from Gianluca Sforna ---
So, I found
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567
on the python3 on EPEL topic.
It seems the guidelines/tooling are not finalized, so I guess we can live with
the current state of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #50 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #49)
> python3 packages
> should not have python3, but should have python%{python3_pkgversion} prefix
> and some other things you need to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #49 from Igor Gnatenko ---
(In reply to Gianluca Sforna from comment #48)
> Update. Same package also builds in mock for EPEL 7
but it doesn't mean that it's properly packaged for EPEL7. python3 packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #48 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Update. Same package also builds in mock for EPEL 7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #47 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> %if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} <= 6
drop such things, you don't build this package for EL*
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #46 from Gianluca Sforna ---
I prepared an updated spec/srpm for the latest version.
It builds in mock for F23, but fails its test suite in F24 (and probably
rawhide) due to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #45 from Antonio Trande ---
make -C _build/latex all-pdf
make[1]: Entering directory
'/builddir/build/BUILD/rdkit-Release_2015_09_2/python2/Docs/Book/_build/latex'
pdflatex 'RDKit.tex'
make[1]: pdflatex:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #44 from Gianluca Sforna ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #43)
> Is this package for epel too ?
Yes, or at least it was supposed to. Recent versions have made it more
difficult to do so (for instance,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #43 from Antonio Trande ---
Hi Gianluca.
Is this package for epel too ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #41 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Ok, starting the stalled review procedure. Will reassign to nobody in a week or
so if we can't continue it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #40 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Updated package and spec, the tests are now fixed:
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.09.2-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #39 from Gianluca Sforna ---
Whoa! that was a huge list, but I think I got it.
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.09.2-1.fc23.src.rpm
are the new SRPM and spec,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) |
--- Comment #37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #38 from Christopher Meng ---
Created attachment 1073997
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1073997=edit
licensecheck of rdkit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Gianluca Sforna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #35 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Newest update on:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
https://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.03.1-2.fc21.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #34 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Updated spec and srpm:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2015.03.1-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
Added the ?_isa bit on subpackages, will fix the python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||100 (ML-SIG)
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #32 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
So the only real issue I see on the report is a directory not owned. I
corrected that in -3.
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #30 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Works on Koji.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6862522
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #29 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9AZKoz
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
+ cd rdkit-Release_2014_03_1
+ export RDBASE=/builddir/build/BUILD/rdkit-Release_2014_03_1
+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #28 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
And now it went final:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2014.03.1-1.fc20.src.rpm
Are there any more blockers? After two years I'd like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #27 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
I am not sure if rawhide was broken or the latest rdkit (currently in beta)
fixed the issue, but it works:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6821330
Updated files:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #26 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Rawhide build failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #25 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #24)
1. F20+ has solved this bug, you can drop these:
# we don't want to provide private python extension libs, snippet from:
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #24 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
1. F20+ has solved this bug, you can drop these:
# we don't want to provide private python extension libs, snippet from:
#
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #23 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
I had a todo item for that. Done in:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2013.09.1-2.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #18 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
my FAS username is giallu. Is this a new requirement or what?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
It's no so new anymore and the default if you fill out the fedora-review form:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedoraformat=fedora-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #20 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Thanks Michael, I hope the new field was added after March 2012 when I opened
this, so at least I have some kind of excuse :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
;) Several tickets from Sep 2012 contain it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #16 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #14)
Also %{docdir}/README should be changed to %{_pkgdocdir}/README
done
Then, cmake has %cmake macro, you should rpm -E %cmake and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
OK.
What's your FAS username?(Please include this in every review request.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #15 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
python-imaging is needed to run the tests. This package is deprecated and now
virtually provided by python-pillow [1]. Make sure it works with Pillow. There
are sometimes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #13 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2013.06.1-1.fc19.src.rpm
Updated to latest release, includes suggestions from Christopher
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #14 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Hi,
First, becasue F20 will use unversioned docdir name, in your global field you
should modify
%global docdir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}
Also %{docdir}/README should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cicku...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Jason Tibbitts from comment #10)
cal 2012 tells me that October 21st 2012 was a Sunday, not a Wednesday.
Fixed
One new non-executable-script complaint:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(gia...@gmail.com) |
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
So, after a fashion, this does build for me and I'll toss out a few random
comments. Without any way to test this I'm just sort of poking about, but I
guess it can't hurt.
rpmlint has
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #8 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
I'm here, trying to sort upstream's SVN-git migration. Will update the spec
asap.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gia...@gmail.com
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #6 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Another upstream release:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2013.03-1.fc18.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Updated again:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2012.12-1.fc18.src.rpm
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com ---
Updated package:
http://giallu.fedorapeople.org/rdkit-2012.06-1.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2012-04-13 11:45:55 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
Perhaps spell
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804125
--- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2012-03-16 13:06:45 EDT
---
rpmlint output
$ rpmlint
92 matches
Mail list logo