https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #5 from Pavel Raiskup ---
(In reply to Randy Barlow from comment #4)
> * Use the %license macro instead of the %doc macro on the LICENSE file.
> * Each subpackage should also have the %license macro.
Done.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371810
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-mongoquery
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246585
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9d21e40faa
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962
Bug ID: 1375962
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx-intl - Sphinx utility
that make it easy to translate and to apply
translation
Product: Fedora
Version:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245889
--- Comment #13 from Miroslav Suchý ---
> Are the py2_build/py3_build and py2_install/py3_install macros supported by
> the EPEL buildroots?
They are for sure for EPEL7. I did not try others.
> Unfortunately as the unit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(praiskup@redhat.c |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375670
Charalampos Stratakis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
Randy Barlow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999
Bug ID: 1375999
Summary: Review Request: python-flufl.bounce - Email bounce
detectors
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
I updated the package, taking into account two differences between F24 and
EPEL:
- Python2 packages now have the "python2" namespace, not just "python"
- Python2 is still the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369688
--- Comment #6 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Commits are pushed for F24 and F25
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python3.git/commit/?h=f24=a3e9c3436919cd754ce496580ce495e538f440eb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5964bac1e2
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718
--- Comment #10 from Jun Aruga ---
Sorry, my mistake. I did not understand it.
Last night I just pushed and pushed the filesafter Pavel's reviewing to git
repo: ssh://jar...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-puma
before
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246590
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
Neal Gompa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ngomp...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-36d5d5faa5
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa ---
Overall, this spec looks good. It conforms very well to the Fedora guidelines.
However, there are a couple of issues. For example, if this package is intended
to work with EPEL, you need
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487
Kamil Páral changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kpa...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224
--- Comment #4 from Alfredo Moralejo ---
New version 0.7.0 with updated requirements created:
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/amoralej/python-tackerclient/raw/master/python-tackerclient-0.7.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138
--- Comment #6 from Pavel Raiskup ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/praiskup/syntastic-rpm/private-praiskup-unretirement-2016/syntastic.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993
Bug ID: 1375993
Summary: Review Request: python-flufl.i18n - A high level API
for Python internationalization
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001
Bug ID: 1376001
Summary: Review Request: python-flufl.lock - NFS-safe file
locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
Bug ID: 1376035
Summary: Review Request: modulemd - Module metadata
manipulation library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364006
Mamoru TASAKA changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123579
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|steve.tray...@cern.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224
--- Comment #5 from Javier Peña ---
[Note] This is an informal review. The spec looks good to me:
---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] =
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
qt5-qtserialbus-5.7.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-09d43bf08f
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{name}}
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{name}}
Can they be not used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
Nick Bebout changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(nb@fedoraproject. |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
--- Comment #8 from James Hogarth ---
Urgh sorry you're right ... missed the distag change after the branch ...
In my defence I was kind of occupied by real life distractions? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Updated, thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123579
Germano Massullo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371810
--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-iowait
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa ---
You need to conditionalize the build, install, check, and file lists for the
python3_other subpackage, as they're only supposed to be run in a python3X
bootstrap condition.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372123
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
$ rpmlint pacmanager
pacmanager.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti
pacmanager.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US rsh -> rah, rs, sh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372123
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366047
Jerry Snitselaar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
> 1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
> %{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{name}}
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372123
--- Comment #4 from Mike Goodwin ---
SPEC diff:
https://github.com/xenithorb/pacmanager-spec/commit/92f266138579f580e5444f005758209e9cefb670
SRPM Update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #6 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Darn, sorry for that. Sometimes it's the most obvious things you see last.
Updated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376149
Bug ID: 1376149
Summary: Review Request: fedora-obsolete-packages - A package
to obsolete retired packages
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa ---
Your file list for the python3_other subpackage is wrong, as it has
"sample-exec" something or other. You might want to verify that the list is
correct...
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116
--- Comment #51 from Sandro Mani ---
Issues:
- Missing requires for unowned directories:
/usr/share/mime/{,packages} -> shared-mime-info
- In my opinion better to also require hicolor-icon-theme and only own
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Bug ID: 1376207
Summary: Review Request: fedmsg-atomic-composer - Composes
atomic trees when Fedora repositories are updated
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15634382
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Please fix the package name in the review, and make sure the spec in the SRPM
is the same as the original one.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #18 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #17)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #15)
> > [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718
--- Comment #9 from Vít Ondruch ---
Hi Jun,
I am not sure we understand each other. When speaking about release bump, you
should do something like:
```
$ rpmdev-bumpspec rubygem-puma.spec -c "Latest change description"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1365794
--- Comment #2 from Charalampos Stratakis ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[!]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
--- Comment #6 from Haïkel Guémar ---
Spec URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep.spec
SRPM URL:
https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep-1.13.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125
Javier Peña changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Release|trunk |---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063
Martin Krizek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkri...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
Bug ID: 1375926
Summary: Review Request: nose2 - Next generation of nicer
testing for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: nose2 - |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360482
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
--- Comment #17 from Tomas Repik ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #15)
> [!]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
> Still not available. can you revert?
> see this template
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #4 from Randy Barlow ---
Here's rev. 2 with the python2- prefix, and these files should also match up:
Spec URL:
https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-fedmsg-atomic-composer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-fedmsg-atomic-composer
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: |Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Patrick Uiterwijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e10c8a3162
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-edaf3dccd0
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686
--- Comment #16 from Marco Driusso ---
Hi Eric, and thanks for the help.
Concerning your comments:
- I think gcc-c++ is actually needed as a BuildRequires, since itpp is a C++
library. Otherwise, how can you build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #2)
> (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #1)
> > 1) Python packaging guidelines recommends usage of macros
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d31fc60666
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
76 matches
Mail list logo