https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396748
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-openal-soft-1.17.2-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fe4313378f
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396748
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395804
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #11 from MartinKG ---
pcsxr is already present in rpmfusion and cannot be at the same time in fedora
repo and should be dropped from rpmfusion !
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||panem...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396817
--- Comment #3 from IWAI, Masaharu ---
(In reply to Thomas Andrejak from comment #1)
> I'm not a packager yet, hence the review is unofficial.
Thanks for your review.
> - Summary:
> Start with an upcase
Fixed.
> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382935
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-visitor-0.1.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397775
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
--- Comment #13 from Tomas Repik ---
Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/caffeine/v2/caffeine.spec
SRPM URL:
https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/caffeine/v2/caffeine-2.3.5-1.fc24.src.rpm
- removing jars in %prep section
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
mod_perl-2.0.10-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-4e7927a6eb
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396748
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-openal-soft-1.17.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8bbf5706c7
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396817
--- Comment #5 from IWAI, Masaharu ---
I update spec files and SRPM package.
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iwaim/fedora-pkgs/master/review/go-setlock/setlock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396817
--- Comment #4 from IWAI, Masaharu ---
(In reply to Thomas Andrejak from comment #2)
> is there a reason that you do not use %gobuild and %gotest ?
Fedora 23 and EPEL 7 don't define its rpm macros.
> Because without
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396636
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8938
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
--- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #3)
> Review approved!
Thanks for the review!
create new SCM requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/requests/8944
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382859
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
kelbt-0.16-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394167
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Data-ICal-TimeZone-1.23-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366862
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
gimp-focusblur-plugin-3.2.6-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370611
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
python-serpy-0.1.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394139
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367819
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
znc-clientbuffer-0-0.1gitfe0f368.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398432
Bug ID: 1398432
Summary: Review Request: playitagainsam - Record and replay
interactive terminal sessions
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
compiler/linker flags are not honored.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396492
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
--- Comment #4 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Can you review bug 1398340 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Heggheim ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #6)
> Sure!
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Heggheim ---
> Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
Looks like fedora-review used the 0.7.6-1 SRPM instead of the 0.7.7-1 SRPM. Not
sure how I can fix it for future reviews.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396636
--- Comment #3 from Ben Rosser ---
Opened this ticket upstream asking for license clarification:
https://github.com/knieriem/markdown/issues/14
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396216
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #4)
> Can you review bug 1398340 ?
Sure!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738589
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738931
Bug 738931 depends on bug 738589, which changed state.
Bug 738589 Summary: Review Request: perl-Socket-Netlink - Interface to Linux's
PF_NETLINK socket family
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738589
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398433
Bug ID: 1398433
Summary: Review Request: granite - elementary GTK+ Development
Library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398433
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395726
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396216
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396216
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396216
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #3)
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069023
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
fifechan-0.1.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325672
Jonny Heggheim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396492
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #2)
> It seems that there are unit test failures when building on current Rawhide.
> Mock build log:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
quassel-irssi-0-2.20161120gitcbd9bd7.fc24 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ed51b0769f
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
quassel-irssi-0-2.20161120gitcbd9bd7.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fa837a829b
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #5)
> > Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
> Looks like fedora-review used the 0.7.6-1 SRPM instead of the 0.7.7-1 SRPM.
> Not sure how I can fix
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
quassel-irssi-0-2.20161120gitcbd9bd7.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b2bb44e437
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374899
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226155
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397030
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-libidn2-0.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273883
--- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166
--- Comment #16 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185550
--- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391444
--- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar ---
mongodb 3.2.8 build has been tested in local mock, it only requires changing 3
lines in Fedora spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185550
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|23 |rawhide
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317624
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324212
--- Comment #4 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398355
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395121
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
--- Comment #11 from David Hannequin ---
Hi,
* [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
If tests are available, it is generally a good idea to run them in %check.
I try to do work test but it failed every time.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
Lubomír Sedlář changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lsed...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16597551
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
mrrescue-1.02e-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-214a4a480e
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397140
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
mrrescue-1.02e-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2445dfc964
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374510
--- Comment #3 from Guido Aulisi ---
Spec URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.sentolavita.com/pkgs/lv2-ir-plugins-1.3.2-2.fc24.src.rpm
Modified real time priority to match
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
Bug ID: 1398340
Summary: Review Request: python-trezor - Python library for
communicating with TREZOR Bitcoin Hardware Wallet
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
And a scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16597752
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398355
Bug ID: 1398355
Summary: Review Request: php-ast - Abstract Syntax Tree
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115
--- Comment #28 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397051
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290342
--- Comment #20 from gil cattaneo ---
(In reply to Tomas Repik from comment #19)
> (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #18)
> > I should add a comment in the spec file?
> > it is not obvious its use?
>
> I mean to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282438
--- Comment #2 from Fedora End Of Life ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 23 is nearing its end of life.
Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining
and issuing updates for Fedora 23.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
That was not intentional, no, so thanks for pointing that out.
I think that that's a bug in my upstream packaging, and I will fix this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794793
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397842
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Uiterwijk ---
Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//python-cccolutils.spec
SRPM URL:
http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//python-cccolutils-1.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
I also fixed the remarks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398340
--- Comment #2 from Jonny Heggheim ---
Updated to 0.7.7:
Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/python-trezor.spec
SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/python-trezor-0.7.7-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10)
> > %description
> > #modified from debian files
>
> Move the comment to ABOVE "%description", as it gets rendered as part of the
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
MartinKG changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
Bug ID: 1398369
Summary: Review Request: python-idstools - Snort and Suricata
Rule and Event Utilities
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||punto...@libero.it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
--- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to David Hannequin from comment #7)
> Hi,
>
> * [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> License field should have the correct name of the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383416
--- Comment #7 from David Hannequin ---
Hi,
* [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License field should have the correct name of the license, which in this case
is just `MIT`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
have time for this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244657 ?
thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379798
--- Comment #14 from Jeremy Newton ---
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398369
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Issues:
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179350
Iryna Shcherbina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo