https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540875
Bug ID: 1540875
Summary: Review Request: python-pyModBusTCP - A simple
Modbus/TCP library for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Se
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539134
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> There's a few fedora-review errors but I don't know how pertinent they are
> regarding EPEL6 packaging, you're using old macros instead of
> %mvn_artif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658
Satoru SATOH changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ss...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from S
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
Iwicki Artur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
--- Comment #14 from Peter Oliver ---
(In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #13)
> I really don't see any use of packaging only for python2 version whereas we
> are moving to python3 soon totally.
>
> Let me see if this can be made compati
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658
--- Comment #3 from Troy Curtis ---
License file change looks good.
The version suffixes are for the corresponding python version.
%{python2_version} and %{python3_version} already have the minor version, for
instance 2.7, and 3.6. So the m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658
--- Comment #4 from Troy Curtis ---
Also the Group: tag is not used in Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539271
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-streaming-stats
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540599
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-remove_dir_all
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539357
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tokio-service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539359
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-take
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539362
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tokio-proto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436734
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not needed
- Patch the incorrect FSF address and notify upstream about it:
ocfs2console.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/ocfs2interface/__init__.py
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500958
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-kiwi-gtk
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
--- Comment #15 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
I had already given my attempt to convert it to python3 compatible code but I
could not make "third_party/spiro/*" code compatible with python3. Its very old
and mathematical code. Also once this convers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1527289
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
--- Comment #2 from Tomas Tomecek ---
Thanks Igor! Good suggestions.
Spec URL: https://ttomecek.fedorapeople.org/rust-threadpool.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ttomecek.fedorapeople.org/rust-threadpool-1.7.1-2.fc28.src.rpmthttps://crates.io/crates/th
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658
--- Comment #5 from Satoru SATOH ---
(In reply to Troy Curtis from comment #4)
> Also the Group: tag is not used in Fedora.
Thanks for you comment. I removed it in the upstream:
https://github.com/ssato/python-anyconfig/commit/d45903b65ebe8e2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538658
--- Comment #6 from Satoru SATOH ---
Troy-san, thanks a lot for your comments!
(In reply to Troy Curtis from comment #3)
> The version suffixes are for the corresponding python version.
>
> %{python2_version} and %{python3_version} already h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Also use the version macro in Source0:
Source0:
https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCR-Runtime/archive/roc-%{version}.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
You should also ask the maintainer of hsakmt to update its package because the
version included in Fedora is too old. I don't even know how you manage to
build it before proposing this review.
http
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433798
--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
@Timothée: if the submitter doesn't answer you can launch a stalled review
process, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
Then you can resubmit a review on your own f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
--- Comment #5 from Tom Stellard ---
The pull request for hsakmt is here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hsakmt/pull-request/1
If you add this copr repo to your mock config, then it should build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539134
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538067
Timothée Floure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538076
Bug 1538076 depends on bug 1538067, which changed state.
Bug 1538067 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-decimal-js - A Javascript library
for arbitrary-precision arithmetic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538067
What|Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538076
Bug 1538076 depends on bug 1538069, which changed state.
Bug 1538069 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-historic-readline - A JavaScript
library extending the node readline module to save history to file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538069
Timothée Floure changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538076
--- Comment #2 from Timothée Floure ---
Here are the slightly modified specfile and SRPM.
Spec URL: https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/insect/insect.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fnux.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/insect/insect-5.0.0-2.fc26.sr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539134
Mattias Ellert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Package Review |Package Review
Version|rawh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539920
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
The maintainer of hsakmt hasn't been active in over a year according to the
FAS, you might have to launch a non-responsive maintainer procedure if there is
no news from him.
https://fedoraproject.or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540314
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433798
--- Comment #4 from Timothée Floure ---
Since the fedora-active-user [0] script shows that @hhorak is still active, I
will wait a few more days for him to react.
[0] https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539134
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bouncycastle1.58. You may commit to the
branch "el6" in about 10 minutes.
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538076
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529705
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540422
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539271
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540599
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539831
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507164
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520753
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520723
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski ---
Thanks for the review.
Spec URL: https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pyusb.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pyusb-1.0.2-2.el7.src.rpm
* Thu Feb 1 2018 Orion Po
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540875
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540314
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-listsafe
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifie
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539831
--- Comment #3 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> Please consider providing an Appdata file. See:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData
Added patch with AppData and opened pull request:
https://github.com/mujx/nheko/pull/224
> You're di
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538341
--- Comment #4 from Brett Lentz ---
Thanks for the help with the spec. I've taken your spec, built it, and checked
it with rpmlint. It looks fine to me, so here's my updated versions:
Spec URL:
https://wakko666.fedorapeople.org/python-testinf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539831
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489983
Tom Stellard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540314
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540314
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
ghc-listsafe-0.1.0.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-55ac90e798
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC l
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538341
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3-pyusb
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notifi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #2 from Germano Massullo ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - You should link directly to the RAW SPEC and provide a SRPM too
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/bettercap/bettercap.spec
https:/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540749
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
python3-pyusb-1.0.2-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-44e50f84b2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #3 from Germano Massullo ---
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/bettercap/rev1/bettercap.spec
https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/bettercap/rev1/bettercap-2.0.0-0.1.fc27.src.rpm
I have changed
BuildReq
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- go-bindata only provides a binary, not a library, and only the binary is
needed for your package. See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/go-bindata
So just replace golang(github.com/jteeuwen/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540726
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
(In reply to Germano Massullo from comment #3)
> https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/bettercap/rev1/bettercap.
> spec
> https://germano.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/bettercap/rev1/b
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537805
James Hogarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Ja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833
--- Comment #2 from David Benoit ---
Thanks for the feedback! I have addressed those items, and here are the
updated components:
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dbenoit/racket/fedora-27-x86_64/00708107-racket/racket-6.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331923
--- Comment #5 from Reto Gantenbein ---
As this updated still didn't make it into the stable repositories so far, I
provided a COPR repository with a drop-in replacement of a newer Jinja2 for
people to use:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539276
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
70 matches
Mail list logo