https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759417
Bug ID: 1759417
Summary: Review Request: libretro-nestopia - Nestopia emulator
with libretro interface
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759413
--- Comment #1 from Artem ---
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/gnome-games/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01050102-libretro-beetle-pce-fast/libretro-beetle-pce-fast.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|gb...@bzb.us|domi...@greysector.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759195
--- Comment #2 from Sergey Avseyev ---
Thanks for the comments, I've updated spec
Spec URL:
https://avsej.fedorapeople.org/mypaint2-brushes/2/mypaint2-brushes.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714001
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-b0d67ad9e6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b0d67ad9e6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759450
Bug ID: 1759450
Summary: Review Request: libretro-prosystem - Port of ProSystem
to the libretro API
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #39 from Sam Nicholls ---
Hi Jun,
Thanks for your patch. I've requested the reviews as per your instructions:
$ fedpkg request-branch --repo htslib f31
$ fedpkg request-repo htslib 1326504
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758929
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1714001
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-d3a619bd1e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d3a619bd1e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758499
Miroslav Suchý changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754964
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
--- Comment #14 from Miro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652588
--- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pytest-metadata
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
Jun Aruga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758927
--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-hajimehoshi-oto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759195
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mypaint2-brushes
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758929
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-68d69acb8d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-68d69acb8d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758929
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751138
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-a251c59e6c has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a251c59e6c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751138
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-898440f612 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-898440f612
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758929
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-c43a59039d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c43a59039d
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-0f676b4567 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0f676b4567
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-da1531bc67 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-da1531bc67
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #44 from Jun Aruga ---
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Submitting_quality_new_packages
> When you open your review request in bugzilla, you should block the
> FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757993
--- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave-zmat
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757993
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-6602723b8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-6602723b8b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757993
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-92ffc4f574 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-92ffc4f574
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759374
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2019-17964d6c72 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-17964d6c72
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
Fabio Valentini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757688
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-config-ini
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #45 from Jun Aruga ---
Dave, how you think about the fact of the libraries that is same pattern with
upstream htslib?
I do not think that your concern is valid considering the fact at the moment.
```
$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libz.so*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759414
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759415
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
--- Comment #8 from Fabio Valentini ---
Great, thanks. I'll go through the review now.
Also, please always paste these links in this format when updating the package:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754654
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-async-lock
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #43 from Jun Aruga ---
> I don't think this should have been waved through with the shared libraries
> in that state.
> It may or may not strictly be incorrect to link libhts.so.1.9 with soname
> libhts.so.2, but it's at least
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758928
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-lunixbochs-vtclean
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757993
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758929
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-WebService-MusicBrainz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759373
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #41 from Jun Aruga ---
Hi Sam,
Sorry, I forget the possibility for you.
You need to get a sponsor from other fedora users before requesting the
repository.
I can be a sponsor for you. Let me check the actual steps.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759206
--- Comment #6 from Carl George ---
rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e68e47bf91
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758926
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-hajimehoshi-mp3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759387
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #46 from Jun Aruga ---
I am asking if current htslib is valid on devel@ mailing list.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/WHZBVT3Y7TKYAEK6EXEY6L77W42T7LJX/
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759407
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754964
--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/breezy
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759375
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759390
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #42 from Dave Love ---
I don't think this should have been waved through with the shared libraries in
that state.
It may or may not strictly be incorrect to link libhts.so.1.9 with soname
libhts.so.2, but it's at least misleading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757684
--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghc-simple-cabal
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759354
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626
--- Comment #13 from Qianqian Fang ---
@eclipseo, I made the following changes according to your above comments:
changeset 1:
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/c6574e3ec3b41240fb4f3aecd35f19889932a802
this addresses the CGAL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759531
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735170
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Jared
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759195
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758007
--- Comment #5 from Qianqian Fang ---
to make it easier to manage, I created a sub-package (jnifti-demos) from this
spec file
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/becd6b47956128267e30ae839d05e45b8d449a27
the current spec file can be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759416
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #40 from Sam Nicholls ---
I got:
> The Bugzilla bug's review is approved by a user that is not a packager
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757993
Qianqian Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758931
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mbndr-figlet4go
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
--- Comment #7 from Dinesh Prasanth ---
I have the latest 2.0.3 build available here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/dmoluguw/jboss-logging-tools/build/1050493/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504
--- Comment #47 from Jun Aruga ---
> Did someone on devel say that's OK?
No. No response so far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751138
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626
--- Comment #15 from Qianqian Fang ---
thanks, the mentioned issues are fixed
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/commit/94aa38ef29203635d7f62117f1b660e3e50610d8
https://github.com/fangq/fedorapkg/blob/iso2mesh/octave-iso2mesh.spec
I have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758293
Bug 1758293 depends on bug 1758686, which changed state.
Bug 1758686 Summary: Review Request: jdeparser - Source generator library for
Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739798
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fiat/pull-request/1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759715
Bug ID: 1759715
Summary: Review Request: python-ffc - Compiler for finite
element variational forms
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758007
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759413
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759687
Bug ID: 1759687
Summary: Review Request: python-dijitso - Distributed
just-in-time building of shared libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626
--- Comment #17 from Qianqian Fang ---
just want to report a problem when building the package (but I have found a
solution).
using the above spec file, when I ran fedpkg build, the job failed initially -
I tried both rawhide and f30, both
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759417
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759450
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752196
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I'd be grateful for a quick review. This is blocking a bunch of other packages.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739793
--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pytest-steps
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MusicBrainz-DiscID-0.04-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758380
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759276
--- Comment #7 from Luke Hinds ---
static files and tornado version clause of < 6 removed.
https://github.com/keylime/keylime/pull/185
Will start to proceed and address other items and then post when ready for next
review cycle.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747552
--- Comment #4 from Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho ---
I've made all the changes requested in comment #3.
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/libdfp/raw/master/f/libdfp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
Dinesh Prasanth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758007
Qianqian Fang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759687
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38152500
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590425
--- Comment #9 from Christophe de Dinechin ---
Updated spec file here:
https://pagure.io/fork/ddd/kata-rpm-reviews/blob/go-rpm-macros/f/kata-runtime/kata-runtime.spec
Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ddd/kata/build/1050710/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759687
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1759715
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758925
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-MusicBrainz-DiscID-0.04-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758035
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758380
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
cawbird-1.0.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758622
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System ---
octave-mcxlab-0.9.5-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759715
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1759687
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
--- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini ---
Maybe the dependencies were necessary for 2.0.0, but are no longer required for
2.0.3?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758626
--- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave-iso2mesh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
--- Comment #11 from Fabio Valentini ---
This is very strange.
I've rebuilt an .src.rpm without these BRs in the .spec file, and a local mock
build passes ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758007
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/octave-jnifti
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758686
--- Comment #10 from Dinesh Prasanth ---
Thanks for the approval, @Fabio.
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #9)
>
> - There are unnecessary BuildRequires. After regenerating them with the
> build.log output from a successful
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
