https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829070
Benjamin Lefoul changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
--- Comment #53 from Honggang LI ---
(In reply to lsun from comment #49)
> > Why does the rshim.service use killall in the first place? There is:
> > > KillMode=process
> >
> > Why this mode? Do you need child processes to be left running
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814682
Honggang LI changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #54 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956243
Laurence Field changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956210
Laurence Field changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
Also you can add weak deps:
Recommends: lm-sensors
Recommends: curl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9aeddd91c6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-9aeddd91c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/catatonit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #17 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wlr-randr
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773720
--- Comment #17 from Brandon Perkins ---
Upstream has fixed the issue with:
https://github.com/haproxytech/dataplaneapi/pull/86
but there is not a release for it yet. This is blocked until a new version is
released.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #4 from Artem ---
Requires: awk
Requires: coreutils
Requires: grep
Requires: procps-ng
Requires: sed
Also need here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #18 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-eb7a6e160b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eb7a6e160b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-abe15ce02e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-abe15ce02e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829539
Bug ID: 1829539
Summary: Review Request: git-delta - Improved diff for git
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #2 from Kelly Brazil ---
Ah, I see. I can provide a spec, but I think the challenge will be with a SRPM.
Since this is a python3 app, typically users use pip to install it and the
source-code is freely available on pypi.org and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829539
--- Comment #1 from Carson Black ---
This package depends on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828938 to
build. (Not sure where the Blocks field went, I don't see it.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825419
Josh Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|CLOSED
Resolution|---
||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #6 from Artur Iwicki ---
*** Bug 1827622 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827587
[Bug 1827587] dnstwist 20200429 is available
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827622
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829523
Bug ID: 1829523
Summary: Review Request: python-pysam - reading, manipulating
and writing genomic data sets
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827925
--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-vmw_backdoor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #3 from Artur Iwicki ---
I'm far from a guru when it comes to packaging Python stuff in Fedora, but a
lot of the questions you ask have been thought out throughout the years and put
in the Python packaging guidelines:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824848
--- Comment #4 from Kelly Brazil ---
This is very helpful, thank you! I'll dig into this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #38 from David Cantrell ---
Everything looks good. My only suggestion is to put a blank line between
%changelog entries in the spec file, so it would look like:
%changelog
* Sat Apr 25 2020 Nick Black - 1.3.3-1
- New upstream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
David Cantrell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #37 from David Cantrell ---
Let's make this the last one...
(In reply to David Cantrell from comment #36)
> [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
It does not.
> [ ]: Package contains no static executables.
It does not.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #7 from Alessio ---
New files.
Spec URL: https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop.spec
SRPM URL:
https://alciregi.fedorapeople.org/bashtop/bashtop-0.8.16-1.fc32.src.rpm
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #36 from David Cantrell ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #9 from Alessio ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #8)
> rpmlint says that packages requires only '/usr/bin/bash' so probably safe to
> add there this packages explicitly. Also zram for example package:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819180
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #6 from Alessio ---
(In reply to Artem from comment #4)
> Requires: awk
> Requires: coreutils
> Requires: grep
> Requires: procps-ng
> Requires: sed
>
> Also need here.
Yes, I thought to include these lines. But just to learn,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
--- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bashtop
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828938
Josh Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1829539
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829539
Josh Stone changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jist...@redhat.com
Depends On|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828813
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825657
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
Lokesh Mandvekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) |
--- Comment #4 from Lokesh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1819180
--- Comment #11 from Petr Menšík ---
Also, do not remove anything from postun. If keyfile would be declared %config
and owned by package, at least as %ghost file, it would be removed by rpm. Such
cleanup is dangerous and should not be used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1822971
--- Comment #39 from Nick Black ---
Wait are you not seeing the blank lines in the spec file? I totally do:
[schwarzgerat](0) $ tail tools/*spec
%attr(0755, -, -) %{python3_sitearch}/notcurses/notcurses.py
%{python3_sitearch}/*.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826326
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
Nick Black changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(d...@qemfd.net) |
--- Comment #3 from Nick Black ---
*
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
--- Comment #5 from Nick Black ---
OK, I've verified that if I install the CMake config files into /usr/lib/cmake
(which did not exist on my system before, and my package would need create),
cmake as installed picks it up, and things can
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-eb7a6e160b has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-e4a845d02d has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-9aeddd91c6 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0e87ab1b08 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-231e9aa60b has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository.
In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827622
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@fabian-affolter.ch
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828938
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823001
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-129d21b52d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable
repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
--- Comment #6 from Nick Black ---
Actually, I see that /usr/lib is explicitly 32-bit, not "noarch". So I'm not
sure how to proceed here. It almost makes me think this shouldn't actually be a
noarch package?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828205
--- Comment #4 from Nick Black ---
That ought have read "1 error, 1 warning", sorry
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #11 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #14 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775443
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #21 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #10 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824156
--- Comment #16 from Simone Caronni ---
(In reply to Eric Sandeen from comment #15)
> I have no strong preferences or opinions re:
> conflicts/provides/obsoletes/whatever, that's not my strong point at all.
> So please don't take anything I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820849
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-231e9aa60b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-231e9aa60b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826998
--- Comment #9 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Updated SPEC URL:
https://nonamedotc.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/python-packages/2019-2020/pyls/rnd1/python-language-server.spec
Updated SRPM URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820842
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820915
--- Comment #4 from Germano Massullo ---
Hi Fabian, if you upload new spec / srpm, as soon all dependencies will be
built on Koji I will download them and do the bettercap review even before the
dependencies will reach stable repository
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Newton ---
Thanks Gwyn!
This has been pushed to rawhide, update for f32 incoming.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #13 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
--- Comment #5 from Lokesh Mandvekar ---
Spec URL: https://pagure.io/catatonit/blob/master/f/catatonit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/catatonit/blob/master/f/SRPMS/catatonit-0.1.5-2.fc32.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829334
Bug ID: 1829334
Summary: Review Request: 3mux - Terminal multiplexer
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829340
Bug ID: 1829340
Summary: Review Request: python3-Pebble - Threading and
multiprocessing eye-candy for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829337
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1829334
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829337
Bug ID: 1829337
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-xdg - Reader
for the XDG Base Directory specification
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829334
Fabian Affolter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1829337
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829340
Miro Hrončok changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #9 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820891
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-0e87ab1b08 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0e87ab1b08
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809303
Peter Robinson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812435
--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter ---
* Thu Apr 23 2020 Fabian Affolter - 0.8.0-2
- Add missing BR for tests (rhbz#1812435)
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43893083
Updated files:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1804768
Jindrich Novy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
code kit changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||codekit...@gmail.com
--- Comment #111 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049
Madhu Tomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mohitkuma...@gmail.com
--- Comment #110
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827622
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
---
89 matches
Mail list logo
