https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #46 from Andrew Toskin ---
(In reply to Mike Goodwin from comment #44)
> This is a massive undertaking that will likely needs its own SIG/Community
> surrounding it and the current chromium builds.
Good point. Maybe post about sta
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #45 from Dominik Opyd ---
(In reply to jeremy9856 from comment #43)
> (In reply to Dominik Opyd from comment #34)
> > Guys, I created pure RPM package for latest Atom and APM. Previously
> > mentioned problems do not occur, everyth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #44 from Mike Goodwin ---
Packaging atom isn't even remotely a possibility until electron is able to be
built on koji.
It seems the gentoo guys figured out how to build it at least:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #43 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Dominik Opyd from comment #34)
> Guys, I created pure RPM package for latest Atom and APM. Previously
> mentioned problems do not occur, everything works as it should. How I take
> over
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Per Bothner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@bothner.com
--- Comment #42 from P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #41 from Paulo Fidalgo ---
More info about Atom is present on this wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Atom
Also don't use helber copr, use the mosquito one. I've been using it and so far
so good!
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #40 from Raphael Groner ---
See also http://blog.atom.io/2014/11/05/linux-packages.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #39 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I use the this copr repo "mosquito/atom" that provide up to date build for F25
but it would be great to have atom in the official repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #38 from Raphael Groner ---
(In reply to jeremy9856 from comment #37)
> I really hope that Atom will be available into Fedora.
> Thanks !
Copr has some builds but latest for Fedora 23 which is EOL. You could ask
helber to provide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #37 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
I really hope that Atom will be available into Fedora.
Thanks !
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|atom|
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #35 from Raphael Groner ---
Hi Dominik,
you can open a new package review request and close this one as a duplication.
Your FAS seems to be inder, this user is currently not in the packager group.
That means you first need to get s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Dominik Opyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dominik.o...@gmail.com
--- Comment #34
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #33 from Alick Zhao ---
(In reply to sensor.wen from comment #32)
> Really want to package these for Atom? Koji does not permit accessing the
> network. How to download these nodejs packages?
>
> ```
> $ ll /usr/lib64/atom/node_mo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #32 from sensor@gmail.com ---
Really want to package these for Atom? Koji does not permit accessing the
network. How to download these nodejs packages?
```
$ ll /usr/lib64/atom/node_modules/ | wc -l
441
```
The nodejs-atom-pac
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(sensor.wen@gmail. |
|com)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Alick Zhao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alick9...@gmail.com
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Helber Maciel Guerra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(helbe...@gmail.co |
|m)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Raphael Groner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||projects...@smart.ms
Flag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter ---
Only a able/willing reviewer, and probably wouldn't hurt to get a fresh
.spec/srpm/comment from the submitter helber, who last commented here many
months ago (2016-03-11)
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #26 from jeremy9...@gmail.com ---
Is there still something that block the package to be add in the repo ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this pr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
jiri vanek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #24 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
Chromium is now package in Fedora, so we should be able to make some progress
if somebody is willing to try again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #23 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
It looks like the Electron/Chromium issue is the most serious one. OTOH, the
fact that Atom has a lot of dependencies on Node.js package isn't a big issue:
there are already about 1000 such packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #22 from Mohammed Safwat ---
I noticed the fact that electron was downloaded as an archive at some step
during the build process. I was planning to package electron for this purpose
so that atom may be made dependent on it.
I spen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sensor@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #20 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
(In reply to Mohammed Safwat from comment #19)
> I tried scratch builds with koji and got stuck at errors during build like
> the ones found here
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #19 from Mohammed Safwat ---
I tried scratch builds with koji and got stuck at errors during build like the
ones found here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13462846.
The build steps for atom seem to contact gith
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #18 from Milan Bouchet-Valat ---
(In reply to Mohammed Safwat from comment #16)
> I filed a ticket here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286303 to
> request npm package upgrade since atom needs a version newer than the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #17 from Helber Maciel Guerra ---
Hi, Mohammed Safwat.
I still update atom version on my copr
(https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/helber/atom/), and this is a rpm spec:
https://github.com/helber/fedora-specs/blob/master/atom/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #16 from Mohammed Safwat ---
I filed a ticket here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286303 to
request npm package upgrade since atom needs a version newer than the one
provided by fedora. I've since waited for npm to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Milan Bouchet-Valat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nalimi...@club.fr
--- Comment #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Michael Schwendt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzil
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Mohammed Safwat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Resolution|NOTABUG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Mohammed Safwat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mohammed_elaf...@yahoo.com
--- Comm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||atom
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #10 from Ryan Sawhill ---
Also, it's worth noting that since
https://github.com/atom/atom/releases/tag/v0.140.0 (October 27), the Atom team
has been building their own rpms with every release.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Oliver Haessler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oli...@redhat.com
--- Comment #9 fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers
-> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
-> https://fedoraproject.org/wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Paulo Fidalgo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paulo.fidalgo...@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
--- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt ---
> probably you need new version of gyp compiler.
That's what should be worked on first:
http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/gyp
Figure out whether a new version is needed, then submit an update request
tick
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132661
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@cicku.me
Blocks|
45 matches
Mail list logo
