subject:"\[Bug 1372670\] Review Request\: driverctl \- device driver control utility"

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2017-03-11 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2017-01-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #9 from Panu Matilainen --- FWIW, I imported what was reviewed, ie http://laiskiainen.org/tmp/driverctl/driverctl-0.91-1.fc24.src.rpm as-is. Deciding what (if anything) to do wrt comment #6 is up to the new maintainer. -- You are

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2017-01-09 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/driverctl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about chan

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2017-01-08 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #7 from Panu Matilainen --- The last I remember on the subject, systemd deliberately would NOT do such things because of atomicity issues: eg if a package drops multiple (dependent) rule files into the directory then the rules shou

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2017-01-04 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review?

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2016-11-29 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #5 from Flavio Leitner --- ping Igor? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2016-10-25 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 Flavio Leitner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat.

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2016-09-16 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #3 from Panu Matilainen --- Updated version which should address all the complaints: SPEC: http://laiskiainen.org/tmp/driverctl/driverctl.spec SRPM: http://laiskiainen.org/tmp/driverctl/driverctl-0.91-1.fc24.src.rpm -- You are r

[Bug 1372670] Review Request: driverctl - device driver control utility

2016-09-06 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372670 --- Comment #2 from Panu Matilainen --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1) > > Group: System Environment/Kernel > not needed Not harmful either. I'm old school and prefer to keep it, thanks. > > > License:LGPLv2 >