https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #25 from Fed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
danmaq-0.2-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-29f2713379
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #23 from Ralph Bean ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): Apologies for the delay!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #22 from Ralph Bean ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/danmaq
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified abou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #21 from Zamir SUN ---
SPEC URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaq/danmaq.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaq/danmaq-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #20 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #19)
> (In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> > > ... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then ju
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias|danmaQ |danmaq
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: danmaQ - A |Review Request: danmaq - A
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #19 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #16)
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> > ... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then just go ahead — the
> > guidelines (the old and t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #18 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to sensor.wen from comment #17)
> - "_" prefix in macro names is not necessary.
>
> %{_commit} -> %{commit}
Oh, thanks. Will change it when packaging into repo
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
sensor@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sensor@gmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #16 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15)
> ... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then just go ahead — the
> guidelines (the old and the new) allow camelCased names when there's goo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
... that said, if you strongly prefer "danmaQ", then just go ahead — the
guidelines (the old and the new) allow camelCased names when there's good
justification.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/703
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and compon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #13 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
That's a typical case of Packaging Guidelines being internally inconsistent.
The rules were changed to prefer lowercase names recently (1-2 years ago), and
that bit of advice you linked to i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #12 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #11)
> One issue: the package should be called "danmaq". See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming:
> > Package names should be in lower case
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl
--- C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Felix Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Felix Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #10 from Felix Yan ---
Looks good to me.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Felix Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Felix Yan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felixonm...@archlinux.org
Assigne
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #7 from Zamir SUN ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6)
> Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine.
>
> Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check.
Done.
Spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine.
Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #5 from Zamir SUN ---
Updated.
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
> danmaQ-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #3 from Zamir SUN ---
Upstream tagged.
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #2 from Zamir SUN ---
I just realized the release is too long. Updated
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0-0.1.20170715git.fc25.src.r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
--- Comment #1 from Zamir SUN ---
The server side is https://dm.tuna.moe/?lang=en
It is open source as well but I am not packaging it at the moment.
https://github.com/tuna/gdanmaku-server
> danmaQ.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/.bui
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806
Zamir SUN changed:
What|Removed |Added
Alias||danmaQ
--
You are receiving this mail be
34 matches
Mail list logo
