https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #25 from Andy Li ---
I will review the opam package once cmdliner arrive to rawhide.
In the mean time, would you review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517584 for me?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System ---
ocaml-cmdliner-1.0.2-5.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2565327532
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #23 from Ben Rosser ---
Thanks for the review!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla ---
(fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-cmdliner
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Andy Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #20 from Ben Rosser ---
Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/ocaml/opam/ocaml-cmdliner.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/ocaml/opam/ocaml-cmdliner-1.0.2-5.fc26.src.rpm
- Added archful
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Andy Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rjo...@redhat.com |a...@onthewings.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #19 from Andy Li ---
Please revise:
* You can copy the %doc line of ocaml-cmdliner to ocaml-cmdliner-devel to
resolve "ocaml-cmdliner-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation".
* The devel package should
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #18 from Andy Li ---
Yes, I will review it.
I have just realized that being in the packager group grants me the right to
prove packages according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
This
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #17 from Ben Rosser ---
Andy, do you want to take the review then? I'd be happy to review swap for
something in exchange.
Otherwise I'll ask the devel list.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I'm still making very slow progress through the OCaml rebuild in Fedora 28.
If I were you I'd go onto the Fedora devel list and offer to do a
"review swap" with someone.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Andy Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@onthewings.net
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #14 from Ben Rosser ---
No worries! There have been some review swap threads on devel@ recently and I
was just wondering if I should offer a swap for this review. I don't think
there's any great rush.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(rjo...@redhat.com |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1501992
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Bug 1477363 depends on bug 1487877, which changed state.
Bug 1487877 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-result - Compat result type
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487877
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #11 from Ben Rosser ---
Now that ocaml-result is in Rawhide, I added a BR on ocaml-result-devel and no
longer patch cmdliner to use Pervasives.result instead. I think this should now
be ready for review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Ben Rosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1487877
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #10 from Ben Rosser ---
I should probably go ahead and actually package ocaml-result, now that jbuilder
is needed for opam anyway (and also accepted).
Trying to build opam with jbuilder fails because I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #9 from Ben Rosser ---
> The final link doesn't include -g so that's one problem:
I've fixed this by passing -lflag -g to ocamlbuild, which does add -g to the
link step (though as far as I can see, this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
> %define libname ...
I believe that all %define should be %global because of a weirdness
of RPM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
(In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #6)
> So it looks like setting true : debug (the equivalent of -tag debug, it
> seems) in the _tags file does indeed generate debuginfo in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #6 from Ben Rosser ---
So it looks like setting true : debug (the equivalent of -tag debug, it seems)
in the _tags file does indeed generate debuginfo in the *.o files. However the
debuginfo package still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
I believe you can change the ocamlbuild command line to add
ocamlbuild ... -tag debug
(https://nicolaspouillard.fr/ocamlbuild/ocamlbuild-user-guide.html)
You'll also want to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser ---
Thanks for taking the review!
> Most packages can create debuginfo. Make sure that -g is passed to
> every invocation of ocamlc, ocamlopt, ocamlmklib (and maybe others).
So cmdliner
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones ---
> %global opt %(test -x %{_bindir}/ocamlopt && echo 1 || echo 0)
Don't use this test. Instead use the %{ocaml_native_compiler} macro
which lists arches that support the native
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
--- Comment #1 from Ben Rosser ---
Upstream has since made an actual release incorporating the buildsystem changes
that caused me to make a snapshot package.
Updated spec and SRPM:
Spec URL:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1478035 |
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|1478034 |
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1478034
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477363
Hanns-Joachim Uhl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1478035
36 matches
Mail list logo