[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-06-28 10:07:22



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
glusterd2-4.1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/C77JAENH7SJFFAWYWWN2MGKDQIKFHIPM/

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
glusterd2-4.1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c93afb8c27

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WWU7FWOS4ZXA4AMJT7WG6ELZ5S3FH6UN/

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IV2FKHFJDM7TUU4PS4WYEQAYGE4PTVJV/

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
glusterd2-4.1.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c93afb8c27

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R3SMJWWGALCAWA2EFAR2KB5SKLESGYLM/

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Bug 1540553 depends on bug 1545663, which changed state.

Bug 1545663 Summary: etcd-devel does not package pkg/monotime/issue15006.s
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545663

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTKAAFFUBRTZ5VZO4Q2NJNDMGJDQFOI7/

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glusterd2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2 - new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kaus...@redhat.com
Summary|Review Request: glusterd2-  |Review Request: glusterd2 -
   |new management daemon for   |new management daemon for
   |GlusterFS   |GlusterFS



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Excellent, package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #6 from Kaushal  ---
Thanks again for the review. The updates Spec and SRPM are available at the
links below.
Spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00727702-glusterd2/glusterd2.spec
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00727702-glusterd2/glusterd2-4.0.0-2.fc29.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - This:

BuildRequires: golang >= 1.8.0

should be

BuildRequires:  %{?go_compiler:compiler(go-compiler)}%{!?go_compiler:golang}


The minimum requirements is not useful since F26 is well over 1.8.0.

 - glusterd2.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/glusterd2']

log-files-without-logrotate:
This package contains files in /var/log/ without adding logrotate
configuration for them.

See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Logrotate_config_file

 - %if 0%{?with_debug}
%global _dwz_low_mem_die_limit 0
%else
%global debug_package   %{nil}
%endif

with_debug is not defined anywhere. You should set it to 1 in order to strip
the binaries.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3)", "Unknown or generated". 322
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/glusterd2/review-glusterd2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and 

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #4 from Kaushal  ---
Spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00727331-glusterd2/glusterd2.spec
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00727331-glusterd2/glusterd2-4.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm

The specfile has been updated again. All the required dependencies have been
updated/added in rawhide. The glusterd2 package now builds with the packaged
dependencies.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Bug 1540553 depends on bug 1545614, which changed state.

Bug 1545614 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-justinas-alice - Painless 
middleware chaining for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545614

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Bug 1540553 depends on bug 1545621, which changed state.

Bug 1545621 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-rasky-go-xdr - Implements 
the XDR standard as specified in RFC 4506 in pure Google Go (Golang)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545621

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Bug 1540553 depends on bug 1545610, which changed state.

Bug 1545610 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-cespare-xxhash - A Go 
implementation of the 64-bit xxHash algorithm (XXH64)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545610

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553
Bug 1540553 depends on bug 1545611, which changed state.

Bug 1545611 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-spaolacci-murmur3 - Native 
MurmurHash3 Go implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545611

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1545663




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545663
[Bug 1545663] etcd-devel does not package pkg/monotime/issue15006.s
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #3 from Kaushal  ---
Spec:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-27-x86_64/00715781-glusterd2/glusterd2.spec
SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/kshlm/glusterd2/fedora-27-x86_64/00715781-glusterd2/glusterd2-4.0rc0-2.fc27.src.rpm

I've updated the spec to be based on the one generated by gofed, and opened
review requests for the dependencies that were missing.

GlusterD2 does not build with the versions of dependencies already packaged in
Fedora. I'm still trying to identify what all packages need to be updated.

The spec has been updated to support unbundled builds. But we still build with
bundled dependencies by default as the current available packaged dependencies
don't work. Once I can confirm that GD2 can build with the packaged
dependencies, I'll change the default to unbundled.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1545621




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545621
[Bug 1545621] Review Request: golang-github-rasky-go-xdr - Implements the
XDR standard as specified in RFC 4506 in pure Google Go (Golang)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1545614




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545614
[Bug 1545614] Review Request: golang-github-justinas-alice - Painless
middleware chaining for Go
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1545611




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545611
[Bug 1545611] Review Request: golang-github-spaolacci-murmur3 - Native
MurmurHash3 Go implementation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1545610




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1545610
[Bug 1545610] Review Request: golang-github-cespare-xxhash - A Go
implementation of the 64-bit xxHash algorithm (XXH64)
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553



--- Comment #2 from Kaushal  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
>  - You're missing %{?dist} in Release
> 
>  - Doesn't this service require its own user and group?
> 
>  - Don't use:
> 
> Requires(post): systemd
> Requires(preun): systemd
> Requires(postun): systemd
> 
>Use the provided macro instead:
> 
> %{?systemd_requires}
> BuildRequires: systemd
> 
>  - Also building with vendored is a no go, you will need to unbundle each
> dependency in vendor. Yes, it's gonna be a big task. Use gofed to do most of
> the work.

Thanks for the comments. I will be updating the spec with the suggested
changes.

About the bundled vendored packages, that will require some work as we'll need
to ensure that we run with the versions Fedora has packaged.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - You're missing %{?dist} in Release

 - Doesn't this service require its own user and group?

 - Don't use:

Requires(post): systemd
Requires(preun): systemd
Requires(postun): systemd

   Use the provided macro instead:

%{?systemd_requires}
BuildRequires: systemd

 - Also building with vendored is a no go, you will need to unbundle each
dependency in vendor. Yes, it's gonna be a big task. Use gofed to do most of
the work.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1540553] Review Request: glusterd2- new management daemon for GlusterFS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540553

Kaushal  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org