Re: [PacketFence-users] PF sending out SNMP De-Auth when set to RADIUS

2015-09-28 Thread Sallee, Jake
Louis: You are correct, we assumed that was an SNMP de-auth request but it is not. I did some more testing and we cannot see any RADIUS messages on any port other than access-request, access-accept, account-request, and accounting-response. Any ideas? Jake Sallee Godfather of Bandwidth System

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF sending out SNMP De-Auth when set to RADIUS

2015-09-28 Thread Louis Munro
On Sep 28, 2015, at 14:47 , Sallee, Jake wrote: > > I did some more testing and we cannot see any RADIUS messages on any port > other than access-request, access-accept, account-request, and > accounting-response. Hi Jake, Just to be sure, there is nothing at all

Re: [PacketFence-users] Different domain for portal profiles

2015-09-28 Thread Andy A
Hi Fabrice. Any update on this? Thanks To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net From: fdur...@inverse.ca Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 08:39:48 -0400 Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Different domain for portal profiles Hello Andy, no it's not possible right now but

[PacketFence-users] PacketFence and SCCM 2012

2015-09-28 Thread Paul Claricoates
Hi, I am looking to implement PacketFence at the college I work at, we currently use SCCM 2012 with Endpoint protection as our antivirus solution, we would like to use an automatic isolation policy to detect infected machines and move them into an isolated vlan for quarantine, would anyone have

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence and SCCM 2012

2015-09-28 Thread Antoine Amacher
Hello Paul, SCCM is yet to be integrated with PacketFence but it should be in the future. From what we looked at, the only way to make SCCM and PacketFence communicate is by using WQL(WMI QL). You could look at a way for PacketFence to query SCCM to verify the state of a machine

Re: [PacketFence-users] Inline accounting

2015-09-28 Thread Simon Gottschlag
Hi Fabrice, Thank you for responding! We are using radius accounting and are able to get violations to work with it, so shouldn't we get this data in the graphs? Perhaps something is disabled when enabling inline? Just to clarify: We are using inline as well as mac based authentication (on the