Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP

This is intended to be temporary anyway, so will push through with this since I have it at least partially working. --- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold xenoph...@godshell.com --- "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something

Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP

Yuck. 802.1x would be for enhanced security, but we’re limited to either cleartext or a crappy hash? I understand this isn’t your issue… Still sucks though. --- Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold xenoph...@godshell.com --- "Any sufficiently advanced

Re: [PacketFence-users] Radius => The server is not configured to listen on any ports. Cannot start

Configure it to listen on a port... Le 2018-05-31 à 08:57, Annibal Abreu via PacketFence-users a écrit : radiusd: Opening IP addresses and Ports The server is not configured to listen on any ports. Cannot start Annibal

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installation by using VM

If you want to do 802.1x yes, if you want to use your ad as an authentication source yes. Btw it's not mandatory to have an AD. But for network that packetfence manage (registration/isolation/inline) you need to use the dhcp/dns from packetfence. Le 2018-05-31 à 00:03, AdvBaxter a écrit :

[PacketFence-users] New PF install trouble joining child domain

All: I'm setting up a new PFv8.1 cluster and I am at the point where I am joining the individual servers to the domains we have. The main / parent domain join went perfectly, but I am unable to join the child domain. Here is the error : Failed to join domain: Failed to set machine spn:

[PacketFence-users] Radius => The server is not configured to listen on any ports. Cannot start

radiusd: Opening IP addresses and Ports The server is not configured to listen on any ports. Cannot start Annibal -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

Re: [PacketFence-users] [new install] can not send email to requestors.

I have made the change. but I can only test by tomorrow morning (in 12 hours). Le mer. 30 mai 2018 à 16:37, Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users < packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> a écrit : > Can you edit /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/config/util.pm > > Then change the send_mime_lite like that

Re: [PacketFence-users] Installation by using VM

Hi, I fixed it my ownself.. the setting not disappear. Just clarify, do I need Server AD to work with pf? As I have own dhcp server from router. Thank you. From: Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users Sent: Thursday, 31 May 2018 10:43 AM To: AdvBaxter via PacketFence-users Cc:

Re: [PacketFence-users] eduroam+packetfence with openldap authentication

hi fabrice. i already try the code and it work well. i try with limit 1 node per user with DEFAULT role. but i have something strange. when user rejected/denied by the packetfence, i saw user will be in REJECT role. and then i try to deregister the first device from nodes tab, then i try again