Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper up/down with SSH - Failed with Login failed to remote host at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/Switch/Juniper.pm line 135.

2020-03-18 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
> $session->input_log(*STDOUT); > > and see if you obtain some useful output. > > Regards > > Fabrice > > > Le 20-03-13 à 23 h 28, Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users a écrit : > > Hello, > > Does anyone know a cli, log or other troubleshooting r

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 9.3 Captive Portal for Guests

2020-03-18 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hi Brandt, >From the log message, it almost sounds to me like Packetfence doesn't know the MAC of the device it's trying to move to the guest VLAN. I'm referring to this: "Unable to extract audit-session-id" Maybe something isn't getting passed with WebAuth that would normally be passed with

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 9.3 Captive Portal for Guests

2020-03-17 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
I think you can rule out an issue with the role mapping or your connection profile since PF seems to be getting the correct role and VLAN: (10.10.80.251) Added VLAN XXX_GUEST to the returned RADIUS Access-Accept (pf::Switch::returnRadiusAccessAccept) (10.10.80.251) Added role 255 to the returned

Re: [PacketFence-users] PacketFence 9.3 Captive Portal for Guests

2020-03-16 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hi Brandt, It sounds like your Meraki device isn't getting a message from Packetfence to switch the user's VLAN after authentication. This usually done through a radius CoA or disconnect message. Did you catch this caveat on the network configuration guide? It looks like you need to specify port

Re: [PacketFence-users] authentication sources packetfence 9.3

2020-03-16 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hello, Are you expecting to assign a role to the device based on rules in the connection profile? I'd start there since the log says no role was assigned. Without a role, I don't see how the device can be assigned to a vlan with autoregistration. When upgrading to 9.3, were the accompanying

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
gt;>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:27 PM Zacharry Williams < >>>>>> zachar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Lol whoops! I was working on a couple firewalls and totally mixed up >>>>>>

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
;>> *Nicholas P. Pier* >>>>>> Network Architect >>>>>> CCNP R, PCNSE, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV, RHCE, CEHv10 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:48 AM Nicholas Pier <09np...@gmail.com>

[PacketFence-users] Juniper up/down with SSH - Failed with Login failed to remote host at /usr/local/pf/lib/pf/Switch/Juniper.pm line 135.

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hello, Does anyone know a cli, log or other troubleshooting resource for packetfence's internal SSH client? - Port 22 is open between the server and the switch. - From the server, I can SSH into the switch with the same credentials I've provided packetfence in the UI. - I've also

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
8 AM Nicholas Pier <09np...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Zachary, >>>>> >>>>> How does OSPF help in the scenario? Is that the right RFC? >>>>> >>>>> To answer your question, the OSPF VPN feature is n

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
later hardware (according to the following link). >>> >>> *Nicholas P. Pier* >>> Network Architect >>> CCNP R, PCNSE, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV, RHCE, CEHv10 >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:21 AM Zacharry Williams >>> wrote:

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
, 2020 at 11:21 AM Zacharry Williams wrote: > Do those switches support rfc 4576? > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020, 5:42 PM Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users < > packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> The Juniper switches are properl

Re: [PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-13 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
ier* > Network Architect > CCNP R, PCNSE, VCIX6-DCV, VCIX6-NV, RHCE, CEHv10 > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:21 AM Zacharry Williams > wrote: > >> Do those switches support rfc 4576? >> >> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020, 5:42 PM Nicholas Pier via Pack

[PacketFence-users] Juniper with CoA/Radius Deauth

2020-03-12 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hello, The Juniper switches are properly placing nodes on vlans based on roles if there's an up/down port event. The problem is that, I can't seem to get de-authentication devices to change their VLAN without an up/down event. We have an important workflow where a user changes role after logging

Re: [PacketFence-users] Issues with PacketFence Captive Portal configuration

2019-06-10 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Felipe, What are you using to de-authorize the port? Radius? CoA? SNMP? Also, what's the make of the switch? I've had the best luck with physical ports using SNMP because it typically "downs" the port before "upping" it. This causes the client to request a new DHCP lease and avoids some of the

Re: [PacketFence-users] Upgrade from 8.01 to. 9.01

2019-06-09 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hi Mike, Did you leverage the Upgrade doc to make each of the tweaks required in moving from 8.x to 9.x? They need to be run for each step between 8.0.1 and 9.0.1. https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/blob/stable/UPGRADE.asciidoc There's numerous database schema changes required along the

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page

2019-06-09 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Eugene, I don't know exactly where the setup logs to. Perhaps packetfence.log ? It might be worthwhile to watch the file sizes of the /usr/local/pf/logs directory to see which file's sizes are growing during installation or just "tail" them. Perhaps one can lead you towards a cause? That said,

Re: [PacketFence-users] Issues with PacketFence Captive Portal configuration

2019-06-08 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hi Ivan, I think this is mostly likely a configuration issue. It sounds like you may be expecting the controller to receive information about the captive portal. This may be possible, but it's not how I've deployed packetfence in the past. Instead, Radius and DNS do most of the work I've only

Re: [PacketFence-users] PF 9.0.1 initial setup is stuck on database page

2019-06-08 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hey Eugene, Yes, your email is making the users mailing list. I haven't been able to reproduce your problem in any recent installations of the Zen appliance. Can you confirm that you set the root password, created the pf database tables, and set the pf user credentials before proceeding? In the

Re: [PacketFence-users] LDAP Admin Portal Login

2019-06-07 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hi Stuart Yes, I've accomplished something similar in a few situations. AD credentials can be leveraged for this purpose. I'd setup an AD authentication source and point it to a local domain controller. Configuration -> Policies and Access Control -> Authentication Sources -> Internal -> Active

[PacketFence-users] PG 9.0.1 accounting sql queries not updating end_time in database. Device status appears as unknown.

2019-06-06 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Hello, I'm looking for some pointers in troubleshooting a radius accounting issue. We're running a new installation of PF 9.0.1. CentOS 7. However, this is not my first time deploying the solution. The issue: nodes are displaying an "unknown" status within the UI. The packetfence server is

Re: [PacketFence-users] PG 9.0.1 accounting sql queries not updating end_time in database. Device status appears as unknown.

2019-06-06 Thread Nicholas Pier via PacketFence-users
Consider this one resolved. I noticed that I was looking at the wrong table and radacct had its own database table. This was empty and logs also indicated that it was regularly being cleaned. /usr/local/pf/logs/pfmon.log:Jun 5 17:36:51 pfmon: pfmon(15935) INFO: [mac:unknown] deleted 0 entries