gt;
>
> From: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:25 PM
> To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Active/Active PF cluster with Maria Galera
>
> Hell
ton, Texas
76513
Fone: 254-295-4658
Phax: 254-295-4221
From: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:25 PM
To: packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Active/Active PF cluster with Maria Gale
Hello Jake,
i am probably the only one at inverse who did a MariaDB Gallera cluster
with PacketFence.
In this setup i have 4 servers, 2 for PacketFence (garb is intalled on
one of them) and 2 for the MariaDB gallera cluster and the idea was to
load balance with haproxy the sql connections
I am reading through the Active/Active documentation and it mentions that the
DB portion can be made active/active using Maria Galera.
What are the benefits/drawbacks of going with the MariaDB route vs the MySQL
route?
I read in the MariaDB Galera docs that you really need at least 3
