Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-16 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Hello Cristian,

i just tested with the latest ios and it looks to be the same (Version
15.2(6)E)

Regards

Fabrice



Le 2017-11-16 à 07:45, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Thank you very much Fabrice, greatly appreciated. I'll schedule an
> upgrade on a test switch.
>
> Maybe the bug is related to this:
> https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCve85309 ?
>
> Il 15/11/2017 22:50, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:
>> Hello Cristian,
>>
>> so i am able to replicate it and it looks to be a bug with the ios version.
>>
>> Let's say i have a nothing connected on the port Gi1/0/8, if i do that:
>>
>> Switch#sh interfaces gigabitEthernet 1/0/8
>> GigabitEthernet1/0/8 is administratively down, line protocol is down
>> (disabled)
>>   Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is dca5.f434.5508 (bia
>> dca5.f434.5508)
>>   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec,
>>  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>>   Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
>>   Keepalive set (10 sec)
>>   Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
>>   input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
>>   ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
>>   Last input 00:07:35, output 00:07:05, output hang never
>>   Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
>>   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>>   Queueing strategy: fifo
>>   Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
>>   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>  484517 packets input, 59890752 bytes, 0 no buffer
>>  Received 266453 broadcasts (221983 multicasts)
>>  0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>>  0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
>>  0 watchdog, 221983 multicast, 0 pause input
>>  0 input packets with dribble condition detected
>>  618866 packets output, 72946865 bytes, 0 underruns
>>  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 35 interface resets
>>  0 unknown protocol drops
>>  0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
>>  0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
>>  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>
>> I have 59890752 bytes in and 72946865 bytes out.
>>
>>
>> I plug a laptop on it, pf receive a accounting packet with in 0 and out
>> 0 (normal).
>>
>> If i shutdown the port then pf receive a accounting packet with 59890752
>> (a little bit more) bytes in and 72946865 (a little bit more) bytes out.
>>
>> ++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
>> | id | acctsessionid | username   | nasipaddress  |
>> acctstatustype | timestamp   | acctinputoctets |
>> acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime | acctuniqueid |
>> ++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
>> |  3 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:21 |   0 |   
>> 0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> |  6 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:19:28 |    59665537 |
>> 72749820 |   7 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> |  9 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:31 |   0 |   
>> 0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> | 12 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:05 |    59846611 |
>> 72909854 | 994 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> | 15 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Start  | 2017-11-15 16:36:26 |   0 |   
>> 0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> | 18 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:57 |    59869432 |
>> 72929035 |  30 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> | 21 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Start  | 2017-11-15 16:38:25 |   0 |   
>> 0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> | 24 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
>> Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:38:56 |    59890752 |
>> 72946865 |  31 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
>> ++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
>>
>> So it looks that 

Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-16 Thread Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users
Thank you very much Fabrice, greatly appreciated. I'll schedule an 
upgrade on a test switch.


Maybe the bug is related to this: 
https://quickview.cloudapps.cisco.com/quickview/bug/CSCve85309 ?


Il 15/11/2017 22:50, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

Hello Cristian,

so i am able to replicate it and it looks to be a bug with the ios version.

Let's say i have a nothing connected on the port Gi1/0/8, if i do that:

Switch#sh interfaces gigabitEthernet 1/0/8
GigabitEthernet1/0/8 is administratively down, line protocol is down
(disabled)
   Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is dca5.f434.5508 (bia
dca5.f434.5508)
   MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec,
  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
   Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
   Keepalive set (10 sec)
   Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
   input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
   ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
   Last input 00:07:35, output 00:07:05, output hang never
   Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
   Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
   Queueing strategy: fifo
   Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
   5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
   5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  484517 packets input, 59890752 bytes, 0 no buffer
  Received 266453 broadcasts (221983 multicasts)
  0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
  0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
  0 watchdog, 221983 multicast, 0 pause input
  0 input packets with dribble condition detected
  618866 packets output, 72946865 bytes, 0 underruns
  0 output errors, 0 collisions, 35 interface resets
  0 unknown protocol drops
  0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
  0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
  0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

I have 59890752 bytes in and 72946865 bytes out.


I plug a laptop on it, pf receive a accounting packet with in 0 and out
0 (normal).

If i shutdown the port then pf receive a accounting packet with 59890752
(a little bit more) bytes in and 72946865 (a little bit more) bytes out.

++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
| id | acctsessionid | username   | nasipaddress  |
acctstatustype | timestamp   | acctinputoctets |
acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime | acctuniqueid |
++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
|  3 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:21 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
|  6 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:19:28 |59665537 |
72749820 |   7 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
|  9 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:31 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 12 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:05 |59846611 |
72909854 | 994 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 15 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:36:26 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 18 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:57 |59869432 |
72929035 |  30 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 21 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:38:25 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 24 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:38:56 |59890752 |
72946865 |  31 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+

So it looks that the in/out bytes are never reseted and the switch send
the in/out bytes since the switch started.

What i can recommend is there is a new ios version then upgrade, if it
doesn't fix the issue then open a TAC with cisco.

Regards

Fabrice



Le 2017-11-15 à 06:09, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :

Ok this my Notebook wifi adapter (E4:B3:18:2C:E0:C0) and 192.168.7.221
is a Cisco WLC. No problem here, the accounting data looks ok:

MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log 

Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-15 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Hello Cristian,

so i am able to replicate it and it looks to be a bug with the ios version.

Let's say i have a nothing connected on the port Gi1/0/8, if i do that:

Switch#sh interfaces gigabitEthernet 1/0/8
GigabitEthernet1/0/8 is administratively down, line protocol is down
(disabled)
  Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is dca5.f434.5508 (bia
dca5.f434.5508)
  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit/sec, DLY 1000 usec,
 reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
  Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
  Keepalive set (10 sec)
  Auto-duplex, Auto-speed, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
  input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
  ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
  Last input 00:07:35, output 00:07:05, output hang never
  Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
  Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
  Queueing strategy: fifo
  Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
  5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
  5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
 484517 packets input, 59890752 bytes, 0 no buffer
 Received 266453 broadcasts (221983 multicasts)
 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
 0 watchdog, 221983 multicast, 0 pause input
 0 input packets with dribble condition detected
 618866 packets output, 72946865 bytes, 0 underruns
 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 35 interface resets
 0 unknown protocol drops
 0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
 0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out

I have 59890752 bytes in and 72946865 bytes out.


I plug a laptop on it, pf receive a accounting packet with in 0 and out
0 (normal).

If i shutdown the port then pf receive a accounting packet with 59890752
(a little bit more) bytes in and 72946865 (a little bit more) bytes out.

++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
| id | acctsessionid | username   | nasipaddress  |
acctstatustype | timestamp   | acctinputoctets |
acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime | acctuniqueid |
++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+
|  3 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:21 |   0 |   
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
|  6 | 005C  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:19:28 |    59665537 |
72749820 |   7 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
|  9 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:19:31 |   0 |   
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 12 | 005D  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:05 |    59846611 |
72909854 | 994 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 15 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:36:26 |   0 |   
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 18 | 0060  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:36:57 |    59869432 |
72929035 |  30 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 21 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Start  | 2017-11-15 16:38:25 |   0 |   
0 |   0 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
| 24 | 0061  | host/inverse-8.inverse.inc | 172.20.135.77 |
Stop   | 2017-11-15 16:38:56 |    59890752 |
72946865 |  31 | 8cf6eb6093c8ef5f8f5b94ebe8e81265 |
++---++---++-+-+--+-+--+

So it looks that the in/out bytes are never reseted and the switch send
the in/out bytes since the switch started.

What i can recommend is there is a new ios version then upgrade, if it
doesn't fix the issue then open a TAC with cisco.

Regards

Fabrice



Le 2017-11-15 à 06:09, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Ok this my Notebook wifi adapter (E4:B3:18:2C:E0:C0) and 192.168.7.221
> is a Cisco WLC. No problem here, the accounting data looks ok:
>
> MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where
> acctuniqueid="c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106";
> 

Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-15 Thread Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users
Ok this my Notebook wifi adapter (E4:B3:18:2C:E0:C0) and 192.168.7.221 
is a Cisco WLC. No problem here, the accounting data looks ok:


MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where 
acctuniqueid="c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106";

++--+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
| id | acctsessionid| username| 
nasipaddress  | acctstatustype | timestamp   | acctinputoctets | 
acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime | acctuniqueid |

++--+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
| 145688 | 5a042efb/e4:b3:18:2c:e0:c0/7093  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 
192.168.7.221 | Start  | 2017-11-09 11:33:31 |   0 
|0 |   0 | c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106 |
| 145705 | 5a042efb/e4:b3:18:2c:e0:c0/7093  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 
192.168.7.221 | Interim-Update | 2017-11-09 11:35:03 |5803 
| 8401 |  93 | c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106 |
| 145784 | 5a042efb/e4:b3:18:2c:e0:c0/7093  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 
192.168.7.221 | Stop   | 2017-11-09 11:40:29 |  223227 
|44823 | 326 | c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106 |
| 183214 | 5a0aa387/e4:b3:18:2c:e0:c0/11165 | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 
192.168.7.221 | Start  | 2017-11-14 09:04:24 |   0 
|0 |   0 | c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106 |
| 183481 | 5a0aa387/e4:b3:18:2c:e0:c0/11165 | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 
192.168.7.221 | Stop   | 2017-11-14 09:15:25 | 6705186 
| 63346445 | 661 | c16c078f963c875d37013c5cba979106 |

++--+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

This is my ethernet Adapter (84:7B:EB:4A:52:05), here the traffic looks 
"out of scale", the same happens for everyone on this switches.


MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where 
acctuniqueid="085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889";

++---+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
| id | acctsessionid | username| nasipaddress  | 
acctstatustype | timestamp   | acctinputoctets | 
acctoutputoctets | acctsessiontime | acctuniqueid |

++---+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
| 143611 | 1212  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Start  | 2017-11-09 09:01:15 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 143612 | 1212  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Interim-Update | 2017-11-09 09:01:15 | 2512995005 |   2056003245 
|   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 143613 | 1212  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Interim-Update | 2017-11-09 09:01:15 | 2512995005 |   2056003245 
|   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 144184 | 1212  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Stop   | 2017-11-09 09:32:36 | 6535801 | 64990835 
|1881 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 144373 | 1217  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Start  | 2017-11-09 09:45:34 |   0 |
0 |   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 146834 | 1217  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Interim-Update | 2017-11-09 12:46:07 | 2543121066 |   2372276848 
|   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 149206 | 1217  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Interim-Update | 2017-11-09 15:46:40 | 29469179 |261831473 
|   0 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |
| 149848 | 1217  | APRA=5C=5Cc.mammoli | 192.168.16.43 | 
Stop   | 2017-11-09 16:40:12 | 7283459 | 86594327 
|3212 | 085b986ead6b7d9a6951d1486493d889 |

++---+-+---++-+-+--+-+--+
8 rows in set (0.00 sec)

MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where 
acctuniqueid="a707be366d38eae790c9baf62fb087df";


Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-14 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Hello Cristian,

when PacketFence receive a accounting request, there are mysql
procedures that will update/insert in the radacct table.

When pf receive a start we log in radacct_log and insert a new entry in
radacct, when it's an interim update we update the entry in the radacct
table and when it's a stop we also update the radacct table and close
the entry.

So if you can do that:

select acctuniqueid from radacct where callingstationid="00:11:22:33:44:55";

and give me the result of that:

select * from radacct_log where acctuniqueid="xyz";

Regards

Fabrice


Le 2017-11-13 à 07:59, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Hi Fabrice, could you please give me an hint to start looking whats
> going wrong here? How is bandwidth calculated and where?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Il 19/10/2017 18:22, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users ha scritto:
>> If you mean PacketFence is 7.3.0
>> If you mean IOS: Cisco IOS Software, C2960X Software
>> (C2960X-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(2)E6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
>>
>>
>> Il 19/10/2017 16:41, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:
>>> Hello Cristian,
>>>
>>> which version are you running ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Fabrice
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> ___
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
> -- 
> Mammoli Cristian
> System administrator
> T. +39 0731 22911
> Via Brodolini 6 | 60035 Jesi (an)
>
>
>
> --
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>
>
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-13 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users

Hello Cristian,

i will be back to you tomorrow, with details and sql request to do.

Regards

Fabrice



Le 2017-11-13 à 07:59, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
Hi Fabrice, could you please give me an hint to start looking whats 
going wrong here? How is bandwidth calculated and where?


Thanks in advance

Il 19/10/2017 18:22, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

If you mean PacketFence is 7.3.0
If you mean IOS: Cisco IOS Software, C2960X Software 
(C2960X-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(2)E6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)



Il 19/10/2017 16:41, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

Hello Cristian,

which version are you running ?

Regards

Fabrice




-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Mammoli Cristian
System administrator
T. +39 0731 22911
Via Brodolini 6 | 60035 Jesi (an)



--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot


___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-11-13 Thread Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users
Hi Fabrice, could you please give me an hint to start looking whats 
going wrong here? How is bandwidth calculated and where?


Thanks in advance

Il 19/10/2017 18:22, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

If you mean PacketFence is 7.3.0
If you mean IOS: Cisco IOS Software, C2960X Software 
(C2960X-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(2)E6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)



Il 19/10/2017 16:41, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

Hello Cristian,

which version are you running ?

Regards

Fabrice




-- 


Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


--
Mammoli Cristian
System administrator
T. +39 0731 22911
Via Brodolini 6 | 60035 Jesi (an)

--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-10-19 Thread Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users

If you mean PacketFence is 7.3.0
If you mean IOS: Cisco IOS Software, C2960X Software 
(C2960X-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.2(2)E6, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)



Il 19/10/2017 16:41, Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users ha scritto:

Hello Cristian,

which version are you running ?

Regards

Fabrice




--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


Re: [PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-10-19 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
Hello Cristian,

which version are you running ?

Regards

Fabrice



Le 2017-10-19 à 09:48, Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users a écrit :
> Hi, I received an alert from packetfence with the following content:
>
> Detect  : No Antivirus software installed
>
> Last Session   :
>     Session Start   : 2017-10-19 15:41:21
>
> Bandwidth Statistics :
>     Today   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
>     This Week   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
>     This Month  : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
>     This Year   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
>
> Time Connected   :
>     Today   : 208.13 Minutes
>     This Week   : 208.13 Minutes
>     This Month  : 208.13 Minutes
>     This Year   : 208.13 Minutes
>
> Apart from the antivirus staff the time connected values are correct,
> but the bandwidth make no sense to me. I suppose the switch is sending
> wrong accounting data, or PF is expecting them in another scale.
>
> Any help?
>
> Thanks
>
> Cristian
>
>
> --
>
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users

-- 
Fabrice Durand
fdur...@inverse.ca ::  +1.514.447.4918 (x135) ::  www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence 
(http://packetfence.org) 


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users


[PacketFence-users] Bandwidth statistics make no sense (Cisco 2960x)

2017-10-19 Thread Cristian Mammoli via PacketFence-users

Hi, I received an alert from packetfence with the following content:

Detect  : No Antivirus software installed

Last Session   :
Session Start   : 2017-10-19 15:41:21

Bandwidth Statistics :
Today   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
This Week   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
This Month  : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )
This Year   : 128.78 GB (IN: 31.46 GB // OUT: 97.32 GB )

Time Connected   :
Today   : 208.13 Minutes
This Week   : 208.13 Minutes
This Month  : 208.13 Minutes
This Year   : 208.13 Minutes

Apart from the antivirus staff the time connected values are correct, but the 
bandwidth make no sense to me. I suppose the switch is sending wrong accounting 
data, or PF is expecting them in another scale.

Any help?

Thanks

Cristian


--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
PacketFence-users mailing list
PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users