Re: [PacketFence-users] PF in Hot-StandBy mode
Hello Pasquale, On 03/12/2019 14:47, Pasquale Lo Bello wrote: Does clustering fit well also for inline enforcement? Yes ! -- Nicolas Quiniou-Briand n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org) ___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
Re: [PacketFence-users] PF in Hot-StandBy mode
Hello Nicolas, thanks for your feedback. I've had a look to the guide, but it seems that Clustering works well for vlan enforcement. Does clustering fit well also for inline enforcement? Thanks Pasquale Il giorno lun 2 dic 2019 alle ore 12:03 Nicolas Quiniou-Briand via PacketFence-users ha scritto: > Hello, > > On 29/11/2019 12:39, Pasquale Lo Bello via PacketFence-users wrote: > > Is there a guide for implementing PF in Inline Hot-Standby mode? I mean > > 2 PF machines that share the same inline interface but where one is the > > hot one and another is standby until the first fails someway. > > You could take a look at your Clustering Guide [1]. Clustering in > PacketFence works as an active/active cluster, not active/passive. You > need at least 3 nodes. > > [1] https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Clustering_Guide.html > -- > Nicolas Quiniou-Briand > n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence > (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org) > > > ___ > PacketFence-users mailing list > PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > ___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
Re: [PacketFence-users] PF in Hot-StandBy mode
Hello, On 29/11/2019 12:39, Pasquale Lo Bello via PacketFence-users wrote: Is there a guide for implementing PF in Inline Hot-Standby mode? I mean 2 PF machines that share the same inline interface but where one is the hot one and another is standby until the first fails someway. You could take a look at your Clustering Guide [1]. Clustering in PacketFence works as an active/active cluster, not active/passive. You need at least 3 nodes. [1] https://packetfence.org/doc/PacketFence_Clustering_Guide.html -- Nicolas Quiniou-Briand n...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.447.4918 *140 :: https://inverse.ca Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (https://sogo.nu), PacketFence (https://packetfence.org) and Fingerbank (http://fingerbank.org) ___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
[PacketFence-users] PF in Hot-StandBy mode
Hello Is there a guide for implementing PF in Inline Hot-Standby mode? I mean 2 PF machines that share the same inline interface but where one is the hot one and another is standby until the first fails someway. Thanks a lot Pasquale ___ PacketFence-users mailing list PacketFence-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
