Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-22 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
users@lists.sourceforge.net" <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> *Cc: *Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca> *Subject: *Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working What is the result of: ps -edf|grep radius Regards Fabrice Le 2017-08-17 à 10:05

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-21 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
users@lists.sourceforge.net" <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working What is the result of: ps -edf|grep radius Regards Fabrice Le 2017-08-17 à 10:05, E

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-21 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
fence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Date: Friday, August 18, 2017 at 12:05 AM To: "packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net" <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Durand fabrice <fdur...@inverse.ca> Subject: Re: [Packet

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
urand <fdur...@inverse.ca> Subject: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working raddebug ... Le 2017-08-17 à 06:12, Emmanuel Togo a écrit : Hello Fabrice, raddebuf command is not available. Regards Emmanuel From: Durand

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-17 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
users@lists.sourceforge.net> > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:59 PM > *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Cc:* Durand fabrice > *Subject:* Re: [P

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-17 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
ct: Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working Hello Emmanuel, it looks that there is just start in your accounting (a way to send interim update and stop from the AP/Switch ?). Can you check with: raddebuf -f /usr/local/pf/run/radius-acct.sock -t 300 and pas

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-08-17 Thread Fabrice Durand via PacketFence-users
via PacketFence-users > <packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Sent:* 26 July 2017 11:59 PM > *To:* packetfence-users@lists.sourceforge.net > *Cc:* Durand fabrice > *Subject:* Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth > violation not working > >

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-26 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
Hello Emmanuel, it looks that there is just start in your accounting (a way to send interim update and stop from the AP/Switch ?). Can you check with: raddebuf -f /usr/local/pf/run/radius-acct.sock -t 300 and paste few requests ? Regards Fabrice Le 2017-07-26 à 03:38, Emmanuel Togo via

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-26 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
Hello Fabrice, Thank you once again. The username in radacct_log is different from mac address. See below the output MariaDB [pf]> select * from radacct_log where username="sophos5";

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-25 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
an you do that: select * from radacct_log where username="08:ee:8b:8c:2e:35"; does it return something ? Le 2017-07-25 à 19:30, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hello Fabrice, Thank you. See the output below +---+---++---+ |

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
Hello Fabrice, Thank you. See the output below +---+---++---+ | callingstationid | acctinput | acctoutput | accttotal | +---+---++---+ | 08:ee:8b:8c:2e:35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-25 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
Hello Emmanuel, can you try that in mysql: SELECT radacct.callingstationid, SUM(radacct_log.acctinputoctets) AS acctinput, SUM(radacct_log.acctoutputoctets) AS acctoutput, SUM(radacct_log.acctinputoctets+radacct_log.acctoutputoctets) AS accttotal

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-25 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
Hello Fabrice, Yes I have. Jul 25 03:16:12 pf pfmon: pfmon(5757) INFO: [mac:unknown] getting violations triggers for accounting cleanup (pf::accounting::acct_maintenance) Jul 25 03:16:12 pf pfmon: pfmon(5757) INFO: [mac:unknown] Found timeframed accounting policy : TOT2MBD for violation

Re: [PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-24 Thread Durand fabrice via PacketFence-users
Hello Emmanuel, do you have something related to bandwidth violation in pfmon.log ? Regards Fabrice Le 2017-07-19 à 16:08, Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users a écrit : Hi All I have upgraded Packetfence-6.5.1 to Packetfence-7.2.0 and bandwidth violation of 100MB/Day stop working. Nothing

[PacketFence-users] Packetfence-ZEN-7.2.0 bandwidth violation not working

2017-07-20 Thread Emmanuel Togo via PacketFence-users
Hi All I have upgraded Packetfence-6.5.1 to Packetfence-7.2.0 and bandwidth violation of 100MB/Day stop working. Nothing happens when a client uses more than 100MB traffic. Regards Emmanuel DISCLAIMER -- NOTE: This e-mail message is subject to the University of Ghana email