[packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
Hi, i've setup an own OBS to fix/cleanup gstreamer for PMOBS, as you can see (1), for every $DIST an extra version of gstreamer. Also build required packages only if $DIST doesn't fullfill the requires. For example: 1140_libmms Build libmms up to 1140, 1210 and later have libmms in oss. If nobody have a problem with this style, i ci it to PMOBS. Detlef (1) http://drcux.de/gstreamer.pdf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
Hi Detlef, Am 28.02.2012 16:06, schrieb Detlef Reichelt: Hi, i've setup an own OBS to fix/cleanup gstreamer for PMOBS, as you can see (1), for every $DIST an extra version of gstreamer. Also build required packages only if $DIST doesn't fullfill the requires. For example: 1140_libmms Build libmms up to 1140, 1210 and later have libmms in oss. why does libmms need to have such magic names ? isn't it enough to build against openSUSE:11.4 and openSUSE:12.1 ? If nobody have a problem with this style, i ci it to PMOBS. Detlef (1) http://drcux.de/gstreamer.pdf ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman Cheers -- Christian - Please do not 'CC' me on list mails. Just reply to the list :) Der ultimative shop für Sportbekleidung und Zubehör http://www.sc24.de ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
Am Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:36:51 +0100 schrieb Christian ch...@computersalat.de: 1140_libmms Build libmms up to 1140, 1210 and later have libmms in oss. why does libmms need to have such magic names ? It is easier to see why we build libmms: We need it for = 1140 If we don't build for 11.4 anymore, it is easy to delete old unneeded packages, because we can delete all 1140_*... ;) It could help to have PMOBS more cleaner. isn't it enough to build against openSUSE:11.4 and openSUSE:12.1 ? Build against 11.4, 11.2, 11.1 (both evergreen) and SLE11. Detlef ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
On 2012-02-28 16:06:42 (+0100), Detlef Reichelt det...@die-mafia.de wrote: Hi, i've setup an own OBS to fix/cleanup gstreamer for PMOBS, as you can see (1), for every $DIST an extra version of gstreamer. Also build required packages only if $DIST doesn't fullfill the requires. For example: 1140_libmms Build libmms up to 1140, 1210 and later have libmms in oss. If nobody have a problem with this style, i ci it to PMOBS. I do, please don't commit those changes. I'm not sure about a better solution yet, but that is a very radical change that has quite a lot of consequences: * we don't link from multimedia:libs any more, hence duplication of work (arguably, there are issues in that repository, I've tried to explain that to maintainers there), * frozen packages rather than the latest: both options are fine, but we always did the latter (ideally we'd have both), * I believe we should rather use different OBS _projects_ to do that, rather than those weird package names. On the latter: what about * Essentials-11.4 - frozen uncrippled versions of what ships with openSUSE 11.4 (oss) * Essentials-12.1 - same for 12.1 * Essentials - latest, built for 11.4, 12.1 and Factory For SLE11, I guess we only need a Essentials-SLE11 and not build for SLE11 in Essentials, as it's going more and more out of date. Dunno about Tumbleweed. It's not much different from Factory, hence only built in Essentials. But let's please give it more thought before making changes. Thanks on your work on this, let's try to find an optimal way. And if people want to help out by maintaining packages, please speak up. Would be even better if we could re-assign maintainership across a lot more people. cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf pgpTttCoUEjJX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
Am Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:18:37 +0100 schrieb Pascal Bleser pascal.ble...@opensuse.org: * we don't link from multimedia:libs any more, hence duplication of work (arguably, there are issues in that repository, I've tried to explain that to maintainers there), No, we could link to multimedia:libs, if the maintainer of libXYZ on OBS takes care about PMOBS! * frozen packages rather than the latest: both options are fine, but we always did the latter (ideally we'd have both), Frozen only if we don't have a maintainer for the package. * I believe we should rather use different OBS _projects_ to do that, rather than those weird package names. Oh, not weird, easy to handle, every user see why we build a package on PMOBS! Now i have to search for packages which are obsolete and unmaintainded... On the latter: what about * Essentials-11.4 - frozen uncrippled versions of what ships with openSUSE 11.4 (oss) * Essentials-12.1 - same for 12.1 * Essentials - latest, built for 11.4, 12.1 and Factory For SLE11, I guess we only need a Essentials-SLE11 and not build for SLE11 in Essentials, as it's going more and more out of date. Dunno about Tumbleweed. It's not much different from Factory, hence only built in Essentials. Hm, for every $DIST a new repo is easier then 1140_libxyz? :D Detlef signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] 0.98.11-5.12 openSUSE Factory i586
Der Installations-Link oder die Datei, die Sie geöffnet haben, enthält keine Anweisungen für diese Version von openSUSE. Macht doch mal was das funktionniert ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] Clean up PMOBS part 1: gstreamer
ti., 28.02.2012 kl. 16.06 +0100, skrev Detlef Reichelt: Hi, i've setup an own OBS to fix/cleanup gstreamer for PMOBS, as you can see (1), for every $DIST an extra version of gstreamer. Also build required packages only if $DIST doesn't fullfill the requires. For example: 1140_libmms Build libmms up to 1140, 1210 and later have libmms in oss. If nobody have a problem with this style, i ci it to PMOBS. Detlef (1) http://drcux.de/gstreamer.pdf Well look at that, just today I branched 2 of the gstreamer packages, as I saw that they had not been updated for a long time, and needed some love. I see you are well ahead of me. No need for me to SR anything ;-) Great initiative Detlef! The gstreamers look to be in need of attention. The only thing I can think of that could cause trouble in the future is the 1210 prefix on packages for tumbleweed, what happens when TW changes to 12.2 base? And a wish from me :-) Could we use this cleanup to rename some of the packages to conform with the rest of gstreamer? Thinking particular about gstreamer010-ffmpeg gstreamer010-fluendo-mpegdemux gstreamer010-fluendo-mpegmux They would then be named: gstreamer-0_10-plugins-ffmpeg gstreamer-0_10-plugins-fluendo-mpegdemux gstreamer-0_10-plugins-fluendo-mpegmux This is of course not strictly needed in any way, it would just be nice. //Bjørn ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
