[packman] k3b package
I have been looking at the packages that still use the old ffmpeg and found the K3B case. Upstream had a patch since half a year ago. And the thing is the package in the main OBS has had this patch for a long time (I added it before it was in upstream's GIT, I guess that's why I didn't submit it to Packman... and then forgot). The openSUSE package also has another patch we miss. And some Recommends... So, I could submit the missing patches to the Packman package. But does it make sense to just drop the Packman package and link to the openSUSE one? I think it would be the best option to avoid problems like this in the future. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] libxine 1.2
From http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/view it seems the only reason the soname was changed is because of Reorder and modify public structures to reduce the holes caused by padding especially on 64-bit architectures. Is this correct? In such a case there should be no need to maintain both versions of the packages since the API has not changed. There can be real concerns... I can't check right now if the libraries use symbol versioning to avoid the usual problems of mixing the two libraries. Just want to know what's the current situation. What's your plan here? ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
Re: [packman] libxine 1.2
On 2 March 2012 19:15, Manfred Tremmel manf...@links2linux.de wrote: I've switched all the frontends (xine-ui, gxine, kaffeine for kde3 and kde4) on packman to use the new libxine2. I also would like to add the OK, that's the part that was confusing me. I used osc whatdependson but that only checks the packages in the Essentials repository and I saw everything using the old version. ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
[packman] Packagers: VLC 2.0, anyone?
Is anyone up to take a shot at VLC 2.0 ? If not, I'll do. We should actually look at Dominique DimStar Leuenberger's builds in his VLC repo first -- no point in repeating tedious work, especially when it's as high quality as his :) cheers -- -o) Pascal Bleser /\\ http://opensuse.org -- we haz green _\_v http://fosdem.org -- we haz conf pgpAop1OSjcFv.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Packman mailing list Packman@links2linux.de http://lists.links2linux.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/packman
