Palm is making the same mistake that IBM did. In a previous incarnation I
was head of OS/2 evangelization for IBM EMEA (yes, I am a very old guy). I
helped to set up devcon, but by then it was already too late. Almost no
consumer software was ever developed for OS/2. Microsoft are crap developers
I have problem with NetLibSelect function. On device, the function allways
returns number 2 even if there's no data in the socket. On emulator it
works fine
How do you handle socket events in your applications? I tried to debug
pokeserver (from Russell Bulmer) and there is also this problem.
no, there were a few sites with access to the sdk that published reviews
personally i feel insulted that nobody with a @palm.com email
address has come here to offer the sdk and apologies. If they expect
developers to make this platform worthwhile, shouldn't they
somehowyou knowbe nice to
Palm has been quick in the past to boast the wide software
offering for Palm OS, yet did very little to actually support the
developers who made their platform attractive, especially
freeware writers, while much of the offering was freeware.
Continued support from developers to migrate their apps
Why you all want to be told that you are special, especially here it from
someone you don't respect?
Why Palm OS /Garnet OS ceased? I guess people around it didn't have the
perseverance not to let go. And I’m talking about you and me and all of as.
I bring memories from my experience with Treo
winInvert winDrawOperation
~source
XOR with destination
blit
--
For information on using the ACCESS Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please
see http://www.access-company.com/developers/forums/
I think if palm is to survive they need to UPDATE PALM OS!! Seriously.
It is supposed to be an OS not a calculator. Most palms come with
software that make it only a little more useful than a
datebook/calendar. Most people don't have a memory card to use with
pTunes... and they would need a
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Shorin vigilante.sho...@gmail.com wrote:
I think if palm is to survive they need to UPDATE PALM OS!!
Did you miss something?
--
Christopher Stamper
Email: christopherstam...@gmail.com
Web: http://tinyurl.com/2ooncg
gTalk: http://tinyurl.com/6e359r
Skype:
On Wednesday 14 January 2009 02:45:45 you wrote:
Palm is making the same mistake that IBM did. In a previous incarnation I
was head of OS/2 evangelization for IBM EMEA (yes, I am a very old guy). I
helped to set up devcon, but by then it was already too late. Almost no
consumer software was
I wish if we could all get together and request from Access the rights of
Gardner OS. Most of us don't really need a supper multitasking device in our
hands. If I wanted anything like this I would get Windows in the first place.
Enough for now. I have work to do.
If you want, join me in
Me too!
Dionei From: llebl...@cam.org To: palm-dev-forum@news.palmos.com Subject:
RE: Are you feeling special? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:30:12 -0800 Palm has
been quick in the past to boast the wide software offering for Palm OS, yet
did very little to actually support the developers who
Was that the 2.99 beta? OS/2 was indeed a lot better than Windows, but it
was not to be.
It was not down to Microsoft, though. They did not indulge in any more dirty
tricks than one would expect, from a company in their position. IBM did it
all by themselves. We were phenomenally incompetent.
Look for
www.ecomstation.com
OS2 is living!
Am 14.01.2009 um 22:23 schrieb Philip Sheard:
Was that the 2.99 beta? OS/2 was indeed a lot better than Windows,
but it
was not to be.
It was not down to Microsoft, though. They did not indulge in any
more dirty
tricks than one would expect,
Philip Sheard wrote:
Was that the 2.99 beta? OS/2 was indeed a lot better than Windows, but it
was not to be.
It was not down to Microsoft, though. They did not indulge in any more dirty
tricks than one would expect, from a company in their position. IBM did it
all by themselves. We were
Germany was the only country that ever went for OS/2 in a big way. I carried
on with OS/2 for a while, but what killed it for me was the lack of apps.
REXX and VisualAge were great, though.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Lösel [mailto:tho...@softelan.com]
Sent: 14 January 2009 21:36
To:
Our office still runs a Lanier box running OS2 for dictation services.
Runs great, though we worry about what happens when it finally dies.
Philip Sheard wrote:
Germany was the only country that ever went for OS/2 in a big way. I carried
on with OS/2 for a while, but what killed it for me was
16 matches
Mail list logo
