At 09:25 PM 3/1/2004, you wrote:
> You have to give up some of the freedom of knowing exactly how Palm OS
> works in order to free it to grow, have more functionality, and become a
> better user experience.
>
All I am suggesting is allowing some room for Hacks (Patches). Another
suggestion is to su
> You have to give up some of the freedom of knowing exactly how Palm OS
> works in order to free it to grow, have more functionality, and become a
> better user experience.
>
All I am suggesting is allowing some room for Hacks (Patches). Another
suggestion is to supply for every structure a uniqu
At 08:40 PM 3/1/2004, you wrote:
I really hope that PalmSource is planning to create many Glue functions, to
access private internal data, or else what are Patches worth? I would
suggest a single function per structure, that returns a structure of
pointers to all internal values. What do you th
I really hope that PalmSource is planning to create many Glue functions, to
access private internal data, or else what are Patches worth? I would
suggest a single function per structure, that returns a structure of
pointers to all internal values. What do you think?
LionScribe
"Ben Combee" <[E
From: Ben Combee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -- Ben Combee, senior DTS engineer, PalmSource, Inc.
> Read "Combee on Palm OS" at http://palmos.combee.net/
Nice new sig! :-)
-slj-
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev
At 06:25 PM 3/1/2004, Brad Figler wrote:
Ben Combee wrote:
You could always do that using FldGetAttributes/FldSetAttributes -- the
FieldAttrType structure isn't part of the protected set.
According to the OS 5.0 documentation that I have installed on my machine,
FieldAttrType is part of the prot
Ben Combee wrote:
You could always do that using FldGetAttributes/FldSetAttributes -- the
FieldAttrType structure isn't part of the protected set.
According to the OS 5.0 documentation that I have installed on my
machine, FieldAttrType is part of the protected set. At least the
warning is at t
At 02:12 AM 3/1/2004, you wrote:
I have not delved deeply in to the new OS (yet). However, I hope that
PalmSource does a better job of providing functions to get at some of the
attributes of their private structures. I don't know how many times I have
wanted to see if an attribute was set in fie
Ben Combee wrote:
> I fully expect the in-memory structures for forms and their objects to
> change a lot in the future on Palm OS Cobalt. For example, PalmSource
> has indicated that there would be some kind of user interface refresh in
> a future release. To do that, it's likely that a lot of t
At 09:12 PM 2/29/2004, you wrote:
Why is PalmSource so intent in hiding the struct definition of all types
(form, control, field, etc.) in the Cobalt release? Is it still going to
change?
I fully expect the in-memory structures for forms and their objects to
change a lot in the future on Palm OS C
10 matches
Mail list logo
