Re: Handling of __DATA__

2003-08-14 Thread Roderich Schupp
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That is not true. It merely strips POD sections. > > > I tried to pack some app that uses Net::LDAP::Constant which reads and > > parses its own POD located after __DATA__. I stand corrected: stuff in __DATA__ gets packed in _except_ POD st

Re: Handling of __DATA__

2003-08-14 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:26:35PM +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote: > One heuristic might be to turn off POD stripping beyond __DATA__ :) Very reasonable. The snapshot build (http://p4.elixus.org/snap/PAR.tar.gz) now preserves everything after __DATA__ -- maybe you can test it a bit? > Another migh

Re: Handling of __DATA__

2003-08-14 Thread Roderich Schupp
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 15:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:26:35PM +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote: > > One heuristic might be to turn off POD stripping beyond __DATA__ :) > > Very reasonable. The snapshot build (http://p4.elixus.org/snap/PAR.tar.gz) > now preserves everythin

Re: Handling of __DATA__

2003-08-14 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:53:27AM +0200, Roderich Schupp wrote: > apparently pp strips everything beyond __DATA__ from the files > it packs (as of PAR 0.72). That is not true. It merely strips POD sections. > I tried to pack some app that uses Net::LDAP::Constant which reads and > parses its ow

Handling of __DATA__

2003-08-06 Thread Roderich Schupp
Hi, apparently pp strips everything beyond __DATA__ from the files it packs (as of PAR 0.72). PAR::Intro briefly mentions a solution for this problem, but continues "no longer needed in recent versions". In case someone wonders, I tried to pack some app that uses Net::LDAP::Constant which reads and