Hi Ken,
could you please give some information about using macros in new Python
shell (ParaView 3.6.2)?
If we check View - Tollbars - Macro Toolbar we can't see any new icon on
the toolbar; if we check Show menu in the Macros tab inside Python
shell, we can see the new menu Macros, but it is
Dear Paraview's list,
I was looking for an option to rescale the data range at each frame of an
animation. In the mailing list archives, I have found an exchange about this,
where Ken asked:
Furthermore, the result could be highly misleading. The constantly rescaled
colors would show shifts
This has now been fixed in CVS. The GUI will no longer ask for a
hostname when configuring a reverse connection.
Utkarsh
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Berk Geveci berk.gev...@kitware.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
This is an issue with the GUI. The client doesn't really care who is
connecting - it
Hi,
I'm trying to export a mesh generated in ICEM CFD to ParaView. I realized that
I can export the mesh to Exodus II format and then open it with ParaView, but
no information about the parts of the mesh is loaded, just the blocks.
Any reader available to export geometry and mesh from ICEM
Today after a CVS update, I'm getting the following error messages (lots of,
but here's one example)
Question : Is linking one plugin to another plugin forbidden now?
Setting CMAKE_BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY to 2.2 didn't seem to make any
difference, errors persist. I will keep trying.
thanks
This is fairly easy to do if you're using python.
You could start off your time series with something like:
contacts/ui/ContactManager?js=RAWmaximize=truehide=trueposition=absolutehl=enemailsLink=truesk=truetitleBar=falseborder=NONEeventCallback=ParentStub1263830196859zx=9qx28f80odc0#
Hi,
I'm trying to export a mesh generated in ICEM CFD to ParaView. I realized
that I can export the mesh to Exodus II format and then open it with
ParaView, but no information about the parts of the mesh is loaded, just the
blocks.
Any reader available to export geometry and mesh from ICEM CFD
Try going to View - Toolbars and clicking on Macro Toolbar.
This is a brand new feature, so we are still flushing out the functionality and
documentation.
-Ken
On 1/18/10 1:58 AM, bassaidai bassaid...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ken,
could you please give some information about using macros in new
If I use the select points on tool, I can select a point, then
release the mouse, hold control, select the select points on tool
again, select another point, and they will now both be in the
selection.
However, if I try to do this with the select points through tool,
the selection is simply
There's a bug that got introduced while fixing the distribution issue
with plugins. For now, I've reverted that change.
Index: CMake/ParaViewPlugins.cmake
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/ParaView3/ParaView3/CMake/ParaViewPlugins.cmake,v
Selection * Through does not support appending to the selection. It's
a known limitation.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:35 AM, David Doria daviddo...@gmail.com wrote:
If I use the select points on tool, I can select a point, then
release the mouse, hold control, select the select points
If I select 3 points and then use the ExtractSelection filter, I would
expect the IDs of the points to be 0,1,2, in the order selected.
Instead, they are 2, 0, 1.
Is there any way to prevent this? I am trying to set corresponding
landmarks, so the order is important, and it is being lost.
Is it reproducible without using Python for creating the objects?
Easiest way to try that is create the objects using python, then save
the state out, then restart paraview and load the state file to create
the objects.
Utkarsh
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:34 AM, Olumide 50...@web.de wrote:
This
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Utkarsh Ayachit
utkarsh.ayac...@kitware.com wrote:
I could not reproduce this. I tried the Moments plugin. Does that
plugin work for you?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:12 AM, David Doria daviddo...@gmail.com wrote:
If I go to Tools-manage plugins and load a
Yes, that is the case. There are 200 lines , each a single cell , and
the pvtp reader splits them up fairly evenly amongst processes to begin
with. D3 is moving stuff around but it doesn't noticeably change the result.
Moreland, Kenneth wrote:
Looking at the mesa-artifacts-decomp.png image, it
I'm guessing that this is a z-buffer precision issue. The nVidia card must be
using a higher precision z-buffer or doing something else that is preventing
the z-fighting that appears to be happening in the Mesa implementation.
-Ken
On 1/18/10 11:47 AM, burlen burlen.lor...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't find anything wrong other then there must be some sort of precision
issue that is interfering with the decision of when to draw a polygon that is
smaller than a pixel. I just checked in a change to IceT that prevents
shifting around the projection matrix in single-display mode. That
I'm not sure vtkImageData (and everything that uses it) really supports
negative spacing. See, for example, this email thread:
http://www.vtk.org/pipermail/vtkusers/2009-May/100989.html.
I agree. And that's why I have added the function fabs to make positive the
tolerance variable.
Consider an arbitrary surface with tangent vectors defined on it. How do you do
for computing streamlines on such a surface? I mean how do you place seed
points? Placing seeds on a shere or on a line does not work since of course
seed points are not on the surface.
Try using Stream Tracer With Custom Source, and passing an extract
selection from the surface as the seed input. There are some caveats
to this if working in parallel.
Utkarsh
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Fred Fred stan1...@hotmail.fr wrote:
Consider an arbitrary surface with tangent
Hi,
I'm trying to export a mesh generated in ICEM CFD to ParaView. I realized
that I can export the mesh to Exodus II format and then open it with
ParaView, but no information about the parts of the mesh is loaded, just the
blocks.
Any reader available to export geometry and mesh from ICEM CFD
21 matches
Mail list logo
