Dear Utkarsh,
thank you for these explanations. If you feel like I "keep asking time
consuming questions over and over again without contributing back to the
community much", it is, because I'll need a long time to get to a point
where I can help others. Maybe never. Depends on the help I get :(
I
> this? Can you go back to your original use-case? What is your objective
> with this? Maybe there are alternative approaches than using the
> "collaboration" support, which frankly is rarely used and hence I'd
> consider experimental.
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 1:34 AM,
Dear Utkarsh,
is there any chance that this issue is looked at during the upcoming
hackathon?
Peter
2016-06-28 17:46 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev :
> Dear Utkarsh,
> I tried to reproduce the error as described in my previous email, but
> haven't been able to until now, don't kno
araView to the same
server.
I guess I'll have to give up programming ParaView and work the old way,
writing VTK files and loading them in ParaView. It is way too complicated.
Peter
2016-06-24 7:08 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev :
> Thank you for the patch. There is still something missing. If I m
Thank you for the patch. There is still something missing. If I modify the
custom client such that it adds an object every half second or so, then
first start this clients and then ParaView after a few seconds, ParaView
misses one of the objects. ParaView finds those objects that are added
before P
Dear Utkarsh,
can you give a quick update whether the suggested bug fix is likely to be
solved:
> Proxies are being created before the session was "ready for use". Like
> I said, collaboration isn't being used actively in production so such
> issues are expected. Since I don't have active projects
Well, I see that I'll need some more debug sessions to get this solved.
>Why not make M aware of the code that needs to be executed and then
>just trigger those through higher level messages from S? This is like
>your first option, but you're only sending coarse messages eg. "Do
>Action1" etc to M
Dear Utkarsh,
to have some basis for this discussion, I'd like to mention that my
knowledge on the collaboration functionality is limited to what is shown in
http://vimeo.com/34480656 and to the class reference
http://www.paraview.org/ParaView/Doc/Nightly/www/cxx-doc/classvtkSMCollaborationManager.
Hi Hengxing,
which commands did you run precisely on which machine? Did you check that
port 1 is available on the server for the client or, in the case of the
reverse connection, available on the client for the server?
when I started a remote server(./pvserver), it failed with the ERRORs
> bel
Dear Utkarsh,
thank you for these very clear explanations and for offering to fix the
issue with loading the initial collaboration state. Although I had
understood that data sources can only be created by the master, it wasn't
obvious to me that the same holds for views. I think I have a better
und
Hello again,
I have a follow-up question concerning my attempts to create a
collaborative standalone client. The attached example connects to a
pvserver running on localhost (with --multi-clients option) and creates a
SphereSource together with its representation. Depending on whether
"USEVIEW" is
Thanks!
Just found out that another solution is to set the view's "Representations"
property to repr and the representation's "Input" property to sphere. I'll
try yours as well, it looks much simpler.
Peter
2016-06-15 19:46 GMT+02:00 Utkarsh Ayachit :
> You're missing "adding the representation
y" long history of
> paraview, so that it has a much more modern design. These are some of the
> reasons why my supervisor convinced me to favour Visit even after I was
> half way through my project.
>
> 2016-06-10 18:58 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev :
>
>> Ok, that doesn't so
Hello,
short question, probably with an easy answer:
Why is the vtkSMRepresentationProxy, created for a vtkSMSourceProxy of a
SphereSource not rendered in the attached c++ code?
I guess I am missing a step which adds the representation to the view. But
how?
Peter
#include "vtkSMSession.h"
#incl
Ok, that doesn't sound as bad as I expected. But still, is it necessary to
"poll" the socket, checking its "select" method?
I am not familiar with the details of socket communication, but I expect it
should be possible that the socket invokes some callback when a message
arrives? Or does some of th
That did the trick, thank you very much! I would have never found the
problem.
One more question out of curiosity: isn't it quite ineffient, if clients
continuously invoke vtkNetworkAccessManager::ProcessEvents´()? For smooth
interaction this has to happen at least 10 times per second, which cause
ssEvents(..) "on idle" to process events
> being received from the other client.
>
>
> [1]
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/blob/master/Qt/Core/pqServer.cxx#L376-401
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Peter Debuchev
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I
eing received from the other client.
>
>
> [1]
> https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/blob/master/Qt/Core/pqServer.cxx#L376-401
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Peter Debuchev
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have attached a short custom client example which I woul
Hello,
I have attached a short custom client example which I would like to always
show the same perspective as a ParaView session connected to the same
pvserver.
However, although this example renders once the objects that are available
in the ParaView session, it does not update itself when the c
Excellent, thank you!
2016-06-06 19:01 GMT+02:00 Utkarsh Ayachit :
> Attached.
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Peter Debuchev
> wrote:
> > Dear Utkarsh,
> > thank you for your offer to search the old ParaView Guide v3
> client-server
> > programming chapt
almost by accident. Maybe it can help you. Apparently it was used in a
> > conference/workshop (VIS08?) to describe briefly the proxy system, and
> > refers to the "Paraview Guide, Version 3, section 18.6, and chapter 19
> for
> > details (see slide 30). Unfortunately
pter 19
> for
> > details (see slide 30). Unfortunately the version 3 of the Guide I
> couldn't
> > find.
> >
> > Ellon
> >
> >
> > On 06/02/2016 07:35 AM, Peter Debuchev wrote:
> >
> > Is any introduction available, how vtkSMServerM
or similar
explaining the principles behind vtkSMSessions, vtkProcies etc.
Does anybody remember, which of the VTK or ITK or Paraview books included
such chapters?
Peter
2016-05-29 19:09 GMT+02:00 Peter Debuchev :
> Dear Paraview programmers,
> I am looking for some information about the
Dear Paraview programmers,
I am looking for some information about the basic principles of Paraviews
client-server model, the setup of client proxies and the communication
design.
I think that I have seen a chapter with a short introduction on these
topics some years ago. It was in one of the VTK
24 matches
Mail list logo
