Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-10 Thread Andy Bauer
Glad to hear it's working properly now! I figured it was something quite subtle but not overly complex to fix once the issue was found. On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:28 AM, wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Thanks for your help. I think i found the problem. In my case, the >

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-10 Thread u . utku . turuncoglu
Hi Andy, Thanks for your help. I think i found the problem. In my case, the initialization code was something like following, ... vtkSmartPointer pipeline = vtkSmartPointer::New(); for (int i = 0; i < *nscript; i++) { pipeline->Initialize(pythonScriptNames[i]);

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-07 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi Ufuk, It's looking to me like the issue is in the adaptor some place. I tried running your scripts (modified slightly) with the CxxFullExample (./CxxFullExample script_1.py script_2.py) and was able to get image_s1* and image_s2* files out of it and did not see the warning you mention. I also

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-07 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Hi Andy, Strange! To test the idea and eliminate other problems i am using same script twice with little mods (i just changed the name of the output png file). So, if i pass script_1.py and script_2.py to the model, it gives warning like before and creates output just for second script

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-06 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi Ufuk, I'm guessing the issue is that the calls to Catalyst are not consistent. Could you share your Python scripts? Also, did you modify them manually? I tried with PV 5.3. with the ../ParaView-v5.3.0/Examples/Catalyst/CxxFullExample/ example with the attached scripts simultaneously by

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-07-04 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Hi Andy, I tested you suggestion about using multiple script in co-processing. In this case, i used following code in the adaptor side to add multiple pipeline for (int i = 0; i < *nscript; i++) { pipeline->Initialize(pythonScriptNames[i]);

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-05-16 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi Ufuk, If you create a vtkCPythonScriptPipeline, when you initialize it with the script file name (which has to be done on each process) everything will be taken care of with respect to broadcasting the file contents from process 0 to the others. We aren't sophisticated enough to parse the

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-05-16 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Thanks Andy. That is exactly what i am looking for. The broadcasting mechanism is not clear to me yet. Do i need to broadcast only the file names? Anyway, i will try to implement it and see what is going on there. Thanks again, Regards, --ufuk On 16/05/2017 14:58, Andy Bauer wrote: Hi Ufuk,

Re: [Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-05-16 Thread Andy Bauer
Hi Ufuk, Unless I'm not understanding your question correctly, I think you can get what you want by adding in multiple vtkCPPythonScriptPipelines to your vtkCPProcessor object in your adaptor. Alternatively if you want to have a single, master Catalyst script handling other Catalyst scripts you

[Paraview] multiple visualization pipeline at a time with co-processing

2017-05-16 Thread Ufuk Utku Turuncoglu (BE)
Hi All, I just wonder that is it possible to trigger multiple visualization pipeline in the same time with co-processing. The co-processing script generator plugin mainly outputs only single pipeline at a time and that is fine but what about combining multiple Python script (generated by