On 23/11/16 18:01, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
When generating an mbox for a patch with tags in the original commit
message, e.g.:
Example patch
This patch is awesome!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan
Acked-by: Russell Currey
the
When generating an mbox for a patch with tags in the original commit
message, e.g.:
Example patch
This patch is awesome!
Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan
Acked-by: Russell Currey
the tags from the original email are duplicated:
On 11/19/2016 10:51 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
Cc: Andy Doan
---
patchwork/api/check.py | 2 +-
patchwork/api/patch.py | 6 +++---
patchwork/api/person.py | 2 +-
patchwork/api/project.py | 2 +-
On 11/19/2016 10:51 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
- Combine anonymous user tests with authenticated user tests
- Rename and simplify some tests
- Improve documentation
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
Cc: Andy Doan
Works for me. At one point, I could
On 11/19/2016 10:51 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
These would be valuable to change via the API.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
Cc: Andy Doan
---
I never anticipated much value from this. ie - if someone wants to
change their name, I'd think they'd
On 11/19/2016 10:51 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
This is apparently the correct way to rename fields, and will ensure a
future API version that supports writes will work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Finucane
Cc: Andy Doan
Much better:
On 11/19/2016 10:51 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote:
This was a design decision made when implementing the REST API. The
idea was that these items were URLs to related objects and should be
indicated as such. However, this was a faulty assumption as the
Patchwork API, unlike other some other APIs