Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Aidan
Why do people doubt the ls14? Why is it kind of cool? Its equal or at least very close to the ls100. Just cheaper. The micks are quiet and can handle a lot of pressure. And you don't need spoken menus to be able to to use the multi track stuff on the 100. Just assign the mute and solo functions to

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Aidan
O, and the ls14 also go up to 96/24bit. On 21/08/2013, Aidan aidan.smartt...@gmail.com wrote: Why do people doubt the ls14? Why is it kind of cool? Its equal or at least very close to the ls100. Just cheaper. The micks are quiet and can handle a lot of pressure. And you don't need spoken menus

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Dane Trethowan
Okay question, regardless of the recorder you buy then why do you want two? I mean a good quality recorder - whether it be a Zoom H1, a Sony, a Olympus or whatever - should suffice? On 21/08/2013, at 7:58 AM, Jörgen Hansson hansson.jo...@spray.se wrote: hey! I myself would go for the olympus

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Dane Trethowan
Yep exactly though finding them may be a problem, Blond Fools wreck - sorry Blind Cool Tech - smile ain't what it used to be, I think Neil has a dedicated web site. On 21/08/2013, at 8:06 AM, Dave Scrimenti dscri...@icloud.com wrote: Before making a final decision, I'd listen to some of the

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Dane Trethowan
Absolutely spot-on. The Zoom H1 handles it but I very rarely use it, 44.1KHZ at 16 bit is good enough for just about anything unless you're doing studio work. On 21/08/2013, at 9:03 AM, tim cumings thcumi...@comcast.net wrote: in my opinion 96.1 khz 24 kbps is overkill for most recording

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Dane Trethowan
For most situations there's little point, we're talking about 2 different things here, you're talking about HD Movies - which incidentally are sampled at 192KHZ 24 bit and we're talking about hand held digital recorders which in most cases don't even need to sample anywhere near as high as

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Ah that's funny man. The dog thing. I have a rabbit. Well, perhaps your right. I don't know, like I said, I thought I notised a difference when I did it on a lap top. I guess I'll jusgt have to weight and see until I get an LS-100 or ask Neal to sand me a sample of it doing this. 48 KHZ is a DVD

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Maybe that's the thing. I maybe just being too much of a studio guy. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 7:25 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: best digital recording thats blind

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
He has an FTP site. I don't know if they are they are there. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:11 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
That's true too, but that's a lot of editing if it's a long file. I guess just starting a new file might not be so bad. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 6:10 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Why yes it does. I just didn't bring it up until the other guy reminded me of it because I wasn't sure if this guy wanted to go high end. It didn't seem so. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Aidan Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:00 AM

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Thanks for telling me. I guess I didn't really doubt it more than I just wasn't sure how it compared to the LS-100. So, thanks for the Info. I just wasn't sure of it. Why any any one else may doubt it, I know not. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Really? Where! -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dave Scrimenti Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:42 AM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly There are still some on the web, even though

Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Dave Scrimenti
Just put Neal Ewers recorder review in to a search engine. - Original Message - From: Hamit Campos hamitcam...@gmail.com To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 8:24 AM Subject: RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly Really?

RE: best digital recording thats blind friendly

2013-08-21 Thread Hamit Campos
Ah okay. -Original Message- From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dave Scrimenti Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 12:26 PM To: PC Audio Discussion List Subject: Re: best digital recording thats blind friendly Just put Neal Ewers recorder review in to a search