Thank you, I'm flattered smile.
On 2/07/2015 4:24 AM, Johny Cassidy wrote:
I need to unsubscribe from this list. Maybe smart arse Dane could point out how.
www.twitter.com/johnycassidy
On 1 Jul 2015, at 19:19, Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote:
I wouldn't be too sure about
You're right about what people are used to yes but tight edits in
Goldwave? Again, if you know what you're doing then yes, you certainly
can do some very tight editing in Goldwave, Total Recorder etc, both
those pieces of software have functions a plenty for tight editing.
On 1/07/2015
Of course you can, the chap who is making these unfortunate statements
is - well to put it bluntly - a little unfortunate in that he invested
all this time and money into Sound Forge and there confessed his loyalty
to the software and doesn't want to admit that anything else cheaper is
as
I wouldn't be too sure about that if I were you, Goldwave - I assume
you're refering to here - does a whole heap of stuff and I do know it
handles multi channel audio - that is to distinguish between multi
channel and multi track -.
On 2/07/2015 1:46 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:
Also SR don't
I need to unsubscribe from this list. Maybe smart arse Dane could point out
how.
www.twitter.com/johnycassidy
On 1 Jul 2015, at 19:19, Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net wrote:
I wouldn't be too sure about that if I were you, Goldwave - I assume you're
refering to here - does a
Yes I like it too.
I also like that I can speed up reading of a audio file, or slow it.
P.
From: tim cumings
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:00 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Review: Sony Creative Software Sound Forge Pro 11 - Studio Daily
If you are looking for a program on
If you are looking for a program on the pc side that is a good editor I
use golswave. Despite opinions to the dcontrary, you can make just as
tight edits in goldave as ou can in sound forge. I think a lot of it is
simply what hyou are used to in terms of an editor. Jonathan Mosen, for
example,
Also SR don't do surround sound.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of tim cumings
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 8:00 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Review: Sony Creative Software Sound Forge Pro 11 - Studio Daily
If you are
Hello I got some tapes that I recorded to computer
is there any settings that I can use to help improve the recording? I
all ready have a dehisser that I am using just wanting to know if there
is any filters that help with bringing up frequencies and making it over
all sound better?
I know
Fair Points and I too have used Adobe Audition though it was quite some
time back, I enjoyed the experience.
I'm not totally anti Sound Forge either, I own Sound Forge Audio Studio,
there are things I don't like about it, I'm not sure - knowing now what
I didn't know when I bought it - I
Dane and others,
This is a valuable thread and I hope we can continue with some serious
discussion because it seems to me that a lot gets glossed over. I started out
with CoolEdit and stuck with it when it became Audition 1.0 and also 1.5 from
Adobe. It wasn't perfect, but it could do a lot,
Yeah I wander actually now on the subject of Pro-Tules how accessible the new
one is because that's what sound designers use.
Also it's the version that will do Dolby Atmos. I would love to hear a movie
in Atmos. It's 62.2 surround sound in cinema, and at home you can at most do
9.1.2 surround
No, I wish. Actually I'd love a Sound-Devices USB Pre2. I love the sound of
Sound Devices stuff. Remember Neal's recorder from Sound Devices? This
interface which is $800 now sadly is based on those recorders. Same pre amps
and stuff. Just like them, it'll do 192 KHZ 24 Bit audio. Which reminds
can you please check and let me know?
my curiousity has been peaked
On 7/1/2015 6:36 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
I’ll have to check that, was quite some time ago and I have to admit to not
upgrading or paying any attention since I bought and used it for a little while.
On 2 Jul 2015, at 11:34
Perhaps not. I just would like the pro 1 because I do want to be a movie sound
designer some day, so I need the surround sound. Like I told you the other day
to, I like the surround sound feature for fun too. I can edit DVD chapters I
extract with DVD Audio Extracter with Pro.
-Original
I've tried Total recorder a little strange to work, but kind of got it. Also,
it doesn't do full blu-ray audio quality. PCM 96 thousand KHZ 24 Bit recording.
I love me some 96 KHZ 24 bit audio.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve
I've never needed scripts for Goldwave and I've used it with Window-Eyes
and NVDA.
When you launch Goldwave your Screen Reader should announce, Screen
Reader Mode.
On 2/07/2015 8:58 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:
No Studio Recorder. Oooo, Gold Wave can handle multy channel now? Yip
yip
No Studio Recorder. Oooo, Gold Wave can handle multy channel now? Yip
yip yip yip yahoo. Actually meant to give it a try after Rick Harmon's
tutorials, but not sure if the scripts work with the demo. Or would you have to
buy Gold Wave first? Couldn't get it to work with out the scripts.
Okay firstly, you can redefine the shortcuts in Total Recorder so they
represent something that you may be used to, I've done this myself.
Second, Total Recorder's support of bit rates depends on what sort of
Interface you're using, I can record in 24 bit 192K if required - and
its not but
Ah okay. Than who ever the dude that first told me about it and gave me the
link to it was was wrong than. Cause who ever that was said it would only do 48
KHZ 16 bit which is a DVD. If it can do 192 yahoo . Even better.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio
Yeah I had missed your previous message. Remind me of the web site for it again
please? Gold Wave that is. I love how you can split files on the fly with it.
Unlike with SF.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent:
Just to clear up any confusion, its the audio device you’re using that
determines what the quality of the audio will be thus the software you’re using
- in this case Total Recorder - gets the information from Windows and the
connected audio Hardware.
In my case if I wish to record at 192K 24
So you too have a Fastrak? Wonder if its the same model as mine.
Bought mine several years ago, came with an extremely useful version of
Pro-tools, accessible on both Windows PC and Mac.
On 2/07/2015 11:20 AM, Hamit Campos wrote:
Oh yeah I understand. Thanks for the clarification anyways.
nice what version of protools?
On 7/1/2015 6:23 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
So you too have a Fastrak? Wonder if its the same model as mine.
Bought mine several years ago, came with an extremely useful version
of Pro-tools, accessible on both Windows PC and Mac.
On 2/07/2015 11:20 AM,
I’ll have to check that, was quite some time ago and I have to admit to not
upgrading or paying any attention since I bought and used it for a little while.
On 2 Jul 2015, at 11:34 am, Hank Smith, and Seeing-eye dog Iona
hank.smith...@gmail.com wrote:
nice what version of protools?
On
Oh yeah I understand. Thanks for the clarification anyways. I knew what you
meant by audio interface because that's what things like the MAudio Fastrack
are called. I saw that on wwwsweetwater.com. So I was all like oo fancy
shmancy word for a pro sound card. Then I said why not just call
26 matches
Mail list logo
