RE: Post processing and Sound FOrge

2007-05-20 Thread Jim Noseworthy
: Re: Post processing and Sound FOrge Tony, sounds like a good idea At 20:01 5/19/2007, you wrote: I'm wondering whether there would be enough interest among those who are proficient in both post production techniques and the use of Sound Forge to serve as a discussion panel in one of the talking

Post processing and Sound Forge

2007-05-20 Thread Tony Swartz
Jim: that's a very generous offer on your part, many thanks. This is terribly imposing, but two individuals on this list who have responded to my Sound Forge questions have been Matthew Bullis and Michael Lang. Gentlemen would you consider serving as a panel. Perhaps there are others as well.

RE: Post processing and Sound Forge

2007-05-20 Thread Jim Noseworthy
, 2007 4:03 PM To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org Subject: Post processing and Sound Forge Jim: that's a very generous offer on your part, many thanks. This is terribly imposing, but two individuals on this list who have responded to my Sound Forge questions have been Matthew Bullis and Michael Lang

Post processing and Sound FOrge

2007-05-19 Thread Tony Swartz
I'm wondering whether there would be enough interest among those who are proficient in both post production techniques and the use of Sound Forge to serve as a discussion panel in one of the talking community rooms. What I was thinking as an example, was for a panel of two or three individuals

Re: Post processing and Sound FOrge

2007-05-19 Thread VICTORIA VAUGHAN
Hi Toney, I wouldn't know enough to be a presenter, but I would definitely be interested in joining or listening to presenters! Please keep me informed, if this works out. Thanks very much. Vicky Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...