Re: Stereo AM Confirmation

2014-04-10 Thread Steve Jacobson
Dane,

I am fairly certain that we used both in the US and that the Motorola system 
was slightly more common in the end, 
but it was never controlled as you said and that likely hurt its chances to 
succeed.  However, FM really took off 
here in the 80's and 90's and that also probably hurt and may have been the 
biggest reason that AM Stereo didn't 
make it.  Who knows.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:10:19 +1000, Dane Trethowan wrote:

Hi!

Okay, it seems that Australia used the Motoroller method for transmitting 
Stereo AM in the end after a battle in 
court over here, the U.S. apparently used the Magnavox method or the Haris 
method, nothing was tightly controlled 
by the FCC until it was far too late smile.



**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane











RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-09 Thread Ray T. Mahorney
that sounds like the same attitude the FCC took we're not going to tell you how 
to do it but if you
want to then have at it.  It wasn't marketed very well over here either.


Ray T. Mahorney
WA4WGA


-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane 
Trethowan
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 04:41
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Stereo AM

Slight corrections required here smile.

AM Stereo was Pushed for cars and I can tell you exactly which manufacturers 
were paid to put
Stereo AM into their products as I was working in the car industry myself at 
the time, never seen so
many sales brochures pertaining to one particular topic at any one time. So the 
manufacturers were
Rover, Holden (GM) - in their Berlenia and Kellett Comodore models -, SAAB, 
Mercedes, Jagua, Nissan
- in their Pintara and above - some rebadge Nissan cars sold by Ford, 
Reindriver.

There are stations still broadcasting Stereo AM in Australia as I reported 
earlier, the one I know
of is 2CA in Canberra.

Stereo AM - as Barry says - never took off in Australia because the format 
really never had a chance
to, unlike digital radio Stereo AM was never given any proper launch, all 
stations were told was
that if they wanted to Broadcast in Stereo AM - and many did because of the 
financial squeeze being
placed upon them by the new FM commercial stations - then they could go right 
ahead from February
1st 1985 and most stations were broadcasting in that format on or by that date.

I know that many stations in the Melbourne area were broadcasting in this 
format long before
February 1ST thus these stations had a head start in the game, they were able 
to Tweak the
performance of the transmitter and equipment, experiment with the various 
methods of Stereo AM
around at the time, gage listener feed back from myself and another person I 
know who I reckon were
probably just about the only people who had AM Stereo sets in Melbourne at one 
stage of the game.

The Stereo AM sets were far more expensive than other radios available and were 
low in stock thus
consumers weren't interested, Why should I pay 5 times the price for a Stereo 
AM set when the FM
one is cheaper and still receives AM which I don't really want to listen to 
anyway as it sounds
dreadful on the radio I have.

Then there was the court battle over which AM Stereo method should be used in 
Australia which -
though finally resolved - didn't help matters, as mentioned earlier som 
manufacturers such as Sony
took matters into their own hands.

There were also interference issues though I never personally experienced any! 
in all my time of
using Stereo AM sets, things were so bad in Sydney at one stage that Radio 2Uw 
and others wouldn't
transmit in Stereo AM between 7 A.M. and 7 P.M..

Because of the expensive nature of a Stereo AM set other solutions were soon 
devised and they found
their way onto the market.  For example, you could buy a Stereo AM Converter 
which you tuned to
the Stereo AM frequency and then the converter would transmit that received 
signal onto a
predetermined frequency on the FM band for your car stereo to receive.

The cheapest AM Stereo tuner I ever saw was one sold by radio shack, I saw it 
as low as $50 and it
was amazingly simple but yet so amazingly affective and quality was very 
reasonable, I know many
inghusiests still have these tuners to this day and most have had mods done on 
them of various kinds
to make them even better.

And finally, the other big problem with Stereo AM was the lack of 
self-contained systems such as
Music Centers and the like featuring Stereo AM, Voxon was the only firm that 
marketed such devices.

To my knowledge, the last AM Stereo unit ever made was by Sony in 1995 which 
marketed the 25th
Anerversary Walkman model which had Am Stereo as part of it, I'm fortunate 
enough to own one of
those sets.

A new standard of Stereo AM was proposed but by the mid 90's manufacturers had 
given the whole idea
away completely and this standard meant spending yet more money on completely 
new chips, I don't
know the name of the standard proposed but I do know that the band width was 
far wider than what we
had been used to up until this time.

Many people dismiss Am Stereo as Rubbish but I certainly do not, with a good 
radio and a good
signal Stereo AM sounded nearly as good - in fact some what better - than many 
processed FM
singnals.

As for music stations in Australia, there are still many that transmit on AM - 
in stereo or not -
which still do very well: 2CH in Sydney, Magic 1278 and My MP in Melbourne, 
Magic 882 and 4KQ in
Brisbane, Cruise 1323 in Adelaide and many other country stations, music will 
always be a part of AM
radio in Australia because of the long distances AM is able to travel and be 
heard.


On 8 Apr 2014, at 9:06 am, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 This is true. However, AM stereo never really took off in Australia, 
 other than for car

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-09 Thread Colin Howard
Dane,

I note nobody has come back on the DropBox link I posted, details below:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7644179/A.%20M.%20stereo.zip

file name: A. M. stereo.zip

I would have thought somebody must have heard this, so why no comments?

I am interested to know what happens when a little out of the strongest
signal area?  Does the stereo switch on and off with different signal
strengths mostly due to fading?

What is the lowest useable frequency?  Did anybody try stereo a.m on long
wave?

Just a few thoughts.




Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-09 Thread Dane Trethowan
I haven't had a listen to your file yet, I haven't had a chance.

I should think that your question regarding the stereo signal would very much 
depend on the method of AM Stereo used.

The method used in Australia had a 25HZ tone broadcast along with the signal 
thus - and yep it does work - so long as the 25HZ tone was received by the 
detector circuit on the AM Stereo radio then the radi could receive the Stereo 
AM signal.

I listen to Radio 2CA in Canberra without any problems, Canberra is around 300 
miles away from here.


On 9 Apr 2014, at 7:49 pm, Colin Howard co...@pobox.com wrote:

 Dane,
 
 I note nobody has come back on the DropBox link I posted, details below:
 
 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7644179/A.%20M.%20stereo.zip
 
 file name: A. M. stereo.zip
 
 I would have thought somebody must have heard this, so why no comments?
 
 I am interested to know what happens when a little out of the strongest
 signal area?  Does the stereo switch on and off with different signal
 strengths mostly due to fading?
 
 What is the lowest useable frequency?  Did anybody try stereo a.m on long
 wave?
 
 Just a few thoughts.
 
 


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane






Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-09 Thread Steve Jacobson
The recording is interesting.  This recording does show AM stereo's 
capabilities, but I have heard better audio 
from receivers using a wider bandwidth, and of course this recording is getting 
some adjacent channel interference 
as well which would make a wider bandwidth less effective.  While long distance 
stereo here in the United States 
was fun, its most useful application in my opinion was on strong and medium 
strength AM signals during the day 
where a wider bandwith is practical.  That could really sound pretty good.  

How AM stereo is handled when a signal is weaker is really a function of the 
receiver being used.  I found that 
less noise was added when a weak AM signal was in stereo than was the case with 
a weaker FM signal.  Fading also 
affected the stereo image as was shown in this recording.  Both the Sony 
Walkman style radio and my Carver tuner 
went into stereo at very low signal levels.

In my experience here in the US, I cannot say that AM stereo caused additional 
interference.  Stations that used a 
wider bandwidth for greater fidelity would, of course, cause more interference, 
and there was a tendency for AM 
stereo stations to want increased fidelity as well, but I didn't notice more 
interference from the stereo process 
itself, nothing like HD radio now.  It is interesting that AM stereo is still 
being used in some areas.

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson


On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:49:05 +0100, Colin Howard wrote:

Dane,

I note nobody has come back on the DropBox link I posted, details below:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7644179/A.%20M.%20stereo.zip

file name: A. M. stereo.zip

I would have thought somebody must have heard this, so why no comments?

I am interested to know what happens when a little out of the strongest
signal area?  Does the stereo switch on and off with different signal
strengths mostly due to fading?

What is the lowest useable frequency?  Did anybody try stereo a.m on long
wave?

Just a few thoughts.









Stereo AM Confirmation

2014-04-09 Thread Dane Trethowan
Hi!

Okay, it seems that Australia used the Motoroller method for transmitting 
Stereo AM in the end after a battle in court over here, the U.S. apparently 
used the Magnavox method or the Haris method, nothing was tightly controlled by 
the FCC until it was far too late smile.



**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane






Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-08 Thread Dane Trethowan
Slight corrections required here smile.

AM Stereo was Pushed for cars and I can tell you exactly which manufacturers 
were paid to put Stereo AM into their products as I was working in the car 
industry myself at the time, never seen so many sales brochures pertaining to 
one particular topic at any one time. So the manufacturers were Rover, Holden 
(GM) - in their Berlenia and Kellett Comodore models -, SAAB, Mercedes, Jagua, 
Nissan - in their Pintara and above - some rebadge Nissan cars sold by Ford, 
Reindriver.

There are stations still broadcasting Stereo AM in Australia as I reported 
earlier, the one I know of is 2CA in Canberra.

Stereo AM - as Barry says - never took off in Australia because the format 
really never had a chance to, unlike digital radio Stereo AM was never given 
any proper launch, all stations were told was that if they wanted to Broadcast 
in Stereo AM - and many did because of the financial squeeze being placed upon 
them by the new FM commercial stations - then they could go right ahead from 
February 1st 1985 and most stations were broadcasting in that format on or by 
that date.

I know that many stations in the Melbourne area were broadcasting in this 
format long before February 1ST thus these stations had a head start in the 
game, they were able to Tweak the performance of the transmitter and equipment, 
experiment with the various methods of Stereo AM around at the time, gage 
listener feed back from myself and another person I know who I reckon were 
probably just about the only people who had AM Stereo sets in Melbourne at one 
stage of the game.

The Stereo AM sets were far more expensive than other radios available and were 
low in stock thus consumers weren't interested, Why should I pay 5 times the 
price for a Stereo AM set when the FM one is cheaper and still receives AM 
which I don't really want to listen to anyway as it sounds dreadful on the 
radio I have.

Then there was the court battle over which AM Stereo method should be used in 
Australia which - though finally resolved - didn't help matters, as mentioned 
earlier som manufacturers such as Sony took matters into their own hands.

There were also interference issues though I never personally experienced any! 
in all my time of using Stereo AM sets, things were so bad in Sydney at one 
stage that Radio 2Uw and others wouldn't transmit in Stereo AM between 7 A.M. 
and 7 P.M..

Because of the expensive nature of a Stereo AM set other solutions were soon 
devised and they found their way onto the market.  For example, you could buy a 
Stereo AM Converter which you tuned to the Stereo AM frequency and then the 
converter would transmit that received signal onto a predetermined frequency on 
the FM band for your car stereo to receive.

The cheapest AM Stereo tuner I ever saw was one sold by radio shack, I saw it 
as low as $50 and it was amazingly simple but yet so amazingly affective and 
quality was very reasonable, I know many inghusiests still have these tuners to 
this day and most have had mods done on them of various kinds to make them even 
better.

And finally, the other big problem with Stereo AM was the lack of 
self-contained systems such as Music Centers and the like featuring Stereo AM, 
Voxon was the only firm that marketed such devices.

To my knowledge, the last AM Stereo unit ever made was by Sony in 1995 which 
marketed the 25th Anerversary Walkman model which had Am Stereo as part of it, 
I'm fortunate enough to own one of those sets.

A new standard of Stereo AM was proposed but by the mid 90's manufacturers had 
given the whole idea away completely and this standard meant spending yet more 
money on completely new chips, I don't know the name of the standard proposed 
but I do know that the band width was far wider than what we had been used to 
up until this time.

Many people dismiss Am Stereo as Rubbish but I certainly do not, with a good 
radio and a good signal Stereo AM sounded nearly as good - in fact some what 
better - than many processed FM singnals.

As for music stations in Australia, there are still many that transmit on AM - 
in stereo or not - which still do very well: 2CH in Sydney, Magic 1278 and My 
MP in Melbourne, Magic 882 and 4KQ in Brisbane, Cruise 1323 in Adelaide and 
many other country stations, music will always be a part of AM radio in 
Australia because of the long distances AM is able to travel and be heard.


On 8 Apr 2014, at 9:06 am, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 This is true. However, AM stereo never really took off in Australia, other 
 than for car radios, although a number of stations either 
 did or still do use it. I don't actually own an AM stereo receiver.
 
 These days in Australia, most of the music stations are on FM while the AM 
 band is mainly for talk stations. In the capital cities 
 where digital radio exists, all the major AM and FM stations simulcast in 
 digital stereo, along with other digital only stations.
 
 Barry

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-07 Thread Anders Holmberg
Hi!
But why in the world use AM at all?
Just curious as i live in Sweden where we don't have much radio stations 
running.
Those who run runb on fm.
/A
6 apr 2014 kl. 05:20 skrev Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au:

 Hi Dane,
 
 From Wikipedia:
 
 C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United 
 States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 
 by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE 
 journal.
 
 Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude 
 modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, 
 that's the main one used in Australia.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:
 
 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.
 
 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.
 
 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back
 in 1987.
 
 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:
 
 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman
 
 -Original

RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-07 Thread Alexandra Grünauer
I think it's important if you want to broadcast long distance, especially in
countries like the USA, Canada or Australia where there are people who don't
live in the range of many FM stations.

Alexandra

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of
 Anders Holmberg
 Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 6:32 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 Hi!
 But why in the world use AM at all?
 Just curious as i live in Sweden where we don't have much radio stations
 running.
 Those who run runb on fm.
 /A
 6 apr 2014 kl. 05:20 skrev Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au:
 
  Hi Dane,
 
  From Wikipedia:
 
  C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the
  United States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 by
Norman
 Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE
journal.
 
  Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature
 amplitude modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.
 
  Barry Chapman
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes,
 that's the main one used in Australia.
 
 
  On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au
 wrote:
 
  Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
  Barry Chapman
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was
  adopted in the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most
  of the big gun radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7.
  by the late 90's stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty
  much done around here now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest
  in the newest form of transmission, the others follow suit.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring
  to, its easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face
  of the radio, I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the
  band switch reminded me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
  The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model
  had the edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing
  Sangean as I do - that's not at all surprising.
 
  I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be
  adjusted to get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an
  annoying trait, you could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner
  that the signal is an AM Stereo signal.
 
  The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built
  for me from the information supplied in the electronics magazine
  Silicon Chip back in 1987.
 
  What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time
  and - if its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any
  interference or odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of
  the AM Stereo signals I used to listen to did exhibit slight bass
  distortion on a Mono set but these signals usually sounded pretty poor
 when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
  The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound
  I've ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they
  were using on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean
 and crisp.
 
 
  On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com
 wrote:
 
  I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony
  pocket portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD
  system on AM is quieter and better sounding, but one has to have
  such a perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition,
  stations that use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio
  bandwidth.  I actually prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo
  system as was used here in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that
  system did not interfere with adjacent stations as does the HD system
 does now.
 
  Best regards,
 
  Steve Jacobson
 
  On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
  In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an
  AM stereo system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding
  home from a gig and would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if
  the station would come in just right, the stereo would kick in;
  it sounded great!  But my first experience with hearing AM stereo
  (again it was with WSM) we had traveled to Nashville; we had a
  Lincoln Town

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-07 Thread Laurence Taylor
On 06/04/2014 13:28, Colin Howard wrote:
 Greetings,
 
 I have absolutely no idea what system is being used in the files, DropBox
 link for which is below, all I can tell you it in the UK A.M stereo has
 never taken off, I am unaware what, if any serious experiments have been
 carried out over here.

Only one; in the 1980s Radio Orwell carried stereo programmes on
its MW transmitter at Foxhall Heath on 255m, using the Motorola
C-QUAM system.

Nothing came of the experiment; I seem to remember that there
were problems of interference as the stereo signal was wider than
normal.


-- 
rgds
LAurence

...Keyboard not found, think F1 to continue.
---Taglines by Tagzilla (tagzilla.mozdev.org)



Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-07 Thread Barry Chapman
This is true. However, AM stereo never really took off in Australia, other than 
for car radios, although a number of stations either 
did or still do use it. I don't actually own an AM stereo receiver.

These days in Australia, most of the music stations are on FM while the AM band 
is mainly for talk stations. In the capital cities 
where digital radio exists, all the major AM and FM stations simulcast in 
digital stereo, along with other digital only stations.

Barry Chapman

- Original Message - 
From: Alexandra Grünauer al.gruena...@gmx.de
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List' pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 2:44 AM
Subject: RE: Stereo AM


I think it's important if you want to broadcast long distance, especially in
countries like the USA, Canada or Australia where there are people who don't
live in the range of many FM stations.

Alexandra

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of
 Anders Holmberg
 Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 6:32 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM

 Hi!
 But why in the world use AM at all?
 Just curious as i live in Sweden where we don't have much radio stations
 running.
 Those who run runb on fm.
 /A
 6 apr 2014 kl. 05:20 skrev Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au:

  Hi Dane,
 
  From Wikipedia:
 
  C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the
  United States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 by
Norman
 Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE
journal.
 
  Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature
 amplitude modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.
 
  Barry Chapman
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes,
 that's the main one used in Australia.
 
 
  On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au
 wrote:
 
  Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
  Barry Chapman
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was
  adopted in the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most
  of the big gun radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7.
  by the late 90's stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty
  much done around here now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest
  in the newest form of transmission, the others follow suit.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
  To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
  Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
  Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
  I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring
  to, its easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face
  of the radio, I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the
  band switch reminded me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
  The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model
  had the edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing
  Sangean as I do - that's not at all surprising.
 
  I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be
  adjusted to get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an
  annoying trait, you could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner
  that the signal is an AM Stereo signal.
 
  The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built
  for me from the information supplied in the electronics magazine
  Silicon Chip back in 1987.
 
  What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time
  and - if its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any
  interference or odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of
  the AM Stereo signals I used to listen to did exhibit slight bass
  distortion on a Mono set but these signals usually sounded pretty poor
 when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
  The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound
  I've ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they
  were using on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean
 and crisp.
 
 
  On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com
 wrote:
 
  I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony
  pocket portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD
  system on AM is quieter and better sounding, but one has to have
  such a perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition,
  stations that use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio
  bandwidth.  I actually prefer a noisier but more reliable AM

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-06 Thread Barry Chapman
Thanks Dane. I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, so if you come up with 
something different, that's fine. I do remember some 
mention of the Harris system back in the 80s.

Barry Chapman

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


Okay fine and I appreciate you looking this up in Wikipedia however not 
everything on Wikipedia is accurate, I know someone else who 
is well informed on this topic and - whilst I'm not disputing the standard used 
at all - I'm curious to know where Motorolla comes 
into the picture in Australia, I'll contribute what I find out to the list.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 1:20 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Hi Dane,

 From Wikipedia:

 C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United 
 States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977
 by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE 
 journal.

 Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude 
 modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.

 Barry Chapman

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, 
 that's the main one used in Australia.


 On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.

 Barry Chapman

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.

 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.

 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.

 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back
 in 1987.

 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.

 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.


 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.

 Best regards,

 Steve Jacobson

 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-06 Thread Dane Trethowan
Another system which was tried was called the Manovox system and sorry if my 
spelling's wrong.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:56 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Thanks Dane. I'm certainly not an expert on the subject, so if you come up 
 with something different, that's fine. I do remember some 
 mention of the Harris system back in the 80s.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 2:42 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Okay fine and I appreciate you looking this up in Wikipedia however not 
 everything on Wikipedia is accurate, I know someone else who 
 is well informed on this topic and - whilst I'm not disputing the standard 
 used at all - I'm curious to know where Motorolla comes 
 into the picture in Australia, I'll contribute what I find out to the list.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 1:20 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:
 
 Hi Dane,
 
 From Wikipedia:
 
 C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United 
 States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977
 by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an 
 IEEE journal.
 
 Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude 
 modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, 
 that's the main one used in Australia.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:
 
 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.
 
 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.
 
 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back
 in 1987.
 
 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:
 
 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-06 Thread Colin Howard
Greetings,

I have absolutely no idea what system is being used in the files, DropBox
link for which is below, all I can tell you it in the UK A.M stereo has
never taken off, I am unaware what, if any serious experiments have been
carried out over here.

The archive file, link for which is below, contains two .mp3s, one is a
report given on the date indicated by the file name, the other, is a
recording made of the A.M. stereo service named, in the location
indicated,at the time and date specified in the file name.

Please be aware the recordings, at a rather low sampling rate,  are somewhat
over-modulated but ought to give some idea.

I know only what is in the recordings therefore cannot make any further
comments.

I will only leave this file on Dropbox until Thursday next, 2014/04/10 at
mid day UK time, as I do not have much disk space left with which to work.

File Name:
A. M. stereo.zip

File Size: 
6.23 MB (6,541,248 bytes)

DownLoad Link:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7644179/A.%20M.%20stereo.zip
  --
Patience is a virtue,
possess it if you can,
seldom found in women,
never found in man.



RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-06 Thread Tom Kaufman
I think there was also something called Amax...anybody ever hear of that
one?  I think this is what WSM in Nashville, Tennessee was using at the
time!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Barry
Chapman
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 11:21 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Stereo AM

Hi Dane,

From Wikipedia:

C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United
States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 
by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an
IEEE journal.

Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude
modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.

Barry Chapman

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes,
that's the main one used in Australia.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.

 Barry Chapman

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted
in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the
radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch
reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.

 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had
the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.

 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.

 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for
me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip
back
 in 1987.

 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and -
if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference
or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals
I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but
these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.

 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were
using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.


 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations
that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.

 Best regards,

 Steve Jacobson

 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had
traveled
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said

Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
Back to the glory days of radio smile.

Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does 
broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a recording 
I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure when the 
content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who have never 
heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane






Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Evan Reese
Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a 
stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did have 
two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you 
could get the stereo sound.

Evan

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
Subject: Stereo AM


Back to the glory days of radio smile.

Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does 
broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a 
recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure 
when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who 
have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.

WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane







RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Tom Kaufman
In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM stereo
system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig and
would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled to
Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So just
to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to tell
me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
totally amazed at how good it sounded!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
Reese
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Stereo AM

Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a 
stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did have 
two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you 
could get the stereo sound.
Evan

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
Subject: Stereo AM


Back to the glory days of radio smile.

Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does

broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a 
recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure 
when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who 
have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane








Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
Yep, that's how I used to do it back in the 80s, was a Teenager then and had no 
buying power smile., its a crewed way of doing it but it did work to an 
extent.

Of course, that procedure you outlined very much depended on the method of 
broadcasting Stereo AM.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 2:58 am, Evan Reese ment...@dslextreme.com wrote:

 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a 
 stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did have 
 two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you 
 could get the stereo sound.
 Evan
 
 - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
 Subject: Stereo AM
 
 
 Back to the glory days of radio smile.
 
 Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does 
 broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a 
 recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure 
 when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who have 
 never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
 WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB
 
 
 **
 
 Dane Trethowan
 Skype: grtdane12
 Phone US (213) 438-9741
 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
 Mobile: +61400494862
 faceTime +61400494862
 Fax +61397437954
 Twitter: @grtdane
 
 
 
 
 


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane






RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Alexandra Grünauer
Hi Dane,

Thanks for that information. I didn't know that there was stereo am. 
Could you please post the direct link because all I found via google was a
guy introducing a stereo am tuner, announcing that he would play it and then
stopping after a quite boring show of unwrapping the thing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25tOtuERp2w

Take care
Alexandra

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 6:34 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Stereo AM

Back to the glory days of radio smile.

Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does
broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a
recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure
when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who
have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane







RE: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Steve Jacobson
I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a 
perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that use 
HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually prefer a 
noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here 
in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.  

Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM stereo
system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig and
would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled to
Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So just
to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to tell
me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
totally amazed at how good it sounded!
Tom Kaufman

-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
Reese
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Stereo AM

Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a 
stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did have 
two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you 
could get the stereo sound.
Evan

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
Subject: Stereo AM


Back to the glory days of radio smile.

Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does

broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a 
recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure 
when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who 
have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane













Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its 
easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio, I 
used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded me of 
a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.

The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the 
edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I do - 
that's not at all surprising.

I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to get 
decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you could 
hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM Stereo signal.

The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me 
from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back in 
1987.

What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if 
its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or 
odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I 
used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these 
signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.

The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've ever 
heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using on their 
transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a 
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that 
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually 
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here 
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.  
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
 Reese
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a 
 stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did have 
 two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you 
 could get the stereo sound.
 Evan
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
 Subject: Stereo AM
 
 
 Back to the glory days of radio smile.
 
 Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that does
 
 broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a 
 recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure 
 when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who 
 have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
 WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB
 
 
 **
 
 Dane Trethowan
 Skype: grtdane12
 Phone US (213) 438-9741
 Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
 Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
 Mobile: +61400494862
 faceTime +61400494862
 Fax +61397437954
 Twitter: @grtdane
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


**

Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane






Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Gary Schindler
Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in 
the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun 
radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's 
stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here 
now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of 
transmission, the others follow suit.


- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its 
easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio, 
I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded 
me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.


The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the 
edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I 
do - that's not at all surprising.


I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to 
get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you 
could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM 
Stereo signal.


The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me 
from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back 
in 1987.


What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if 
its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or 
odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I 
used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these 
signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.


The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've 
ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using 
on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.



On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that 
use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually 
prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.


Best regards,

Steve Jacobson

On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM 
stereo
system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig 
and

would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled 
to

Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So 
just
to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to 
tell

me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
totally amazed at how good it sounded!
Tom Kaufman



-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
Reese
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Stereo AM



Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a
stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did 
have

two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you
could get the stereo sound.
Evan


- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net

To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
Subject: Stereo AM




Back to the glory days of radio smile.


Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that 
does



broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a
recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure
when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who
have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy.
WCTC in AM Stereo on Denon TU-680NAB




**



Dane Trethowan
Skype: grtdane12
Phone US (213) 438-9741
Phone U.K. 01245 79 0598
Phone Australia (03) 9005 8589
Mobile: +61400494862
faceTime +61400494862
Fax +61397437954
Twitter: @grtdane















**

Dane

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Barry Chapman
Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.

Barry Chapman

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in 
the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun 
radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's 
stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here 
now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of 
transmission, the others follow suit.

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its 
easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio, 
I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded 
me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.

The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the 
edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I 
do - that's not at all surprising.

I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to 
get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you 
could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM 
Stereo signal.

The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me 
from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back 
in 1987.

What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if 
its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or 
odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I 
used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these 
signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.

The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've 
ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using 
on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that 
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually 
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.

 Best regards,

 Steve Jacobson

 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM 
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig 
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled 
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So 
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to 
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
 Reese
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM

 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a
 stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did 
 have
 two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you
 could get the stereo sound.
 Evan

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
 Subject: Stereo AM


 Back to the glory days of radio smile.

 Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that 
 does

 broadcast in AM Stereo to this day and that's 2CA Canberra, Here's a
 recording I found on Youtube of a station in the U.S. though I'm not sure
 when the content was actually aired, quite nice audio so - for those who
 have never heard stereo AM before - take a moment to enjoy

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
That wasn't always the case, there was a battle in court at some point there 
over what method was to be used, Sony was one of those company's that was 
absolutely sick and tired of the whole Method argument so they made their own 
systems whereby the user could either Switch methods depending on the one 
used or - in later models - the set would detect the method automatically.

For a while in Australia the ABC was using the Haris method.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in 
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun 
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's 
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here 
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of 
 transmission, the others follow suit.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its 
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio, 
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded 
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the 
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I 
 do - that's not at all surprising.
 
 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to 
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you 
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM 
 Stereo signal.
 
 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me 
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back 
 in 1987.
 
 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if 
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or 
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I 
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these 
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've 
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using 
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:
 
 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that 
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually 
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM 
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig 
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled 
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So 
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to 
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
 Reese
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a
 stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did 
 have
 two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you
 could get the stereo sound.
 Evan

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, that's 
the main one used in Australia.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in 
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun 
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's 
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here 
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of 
 transmission, the others follow suit.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its 
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio, 
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded 
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the 
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I 
 do - that's not at all surprising.
 
 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to 
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you 
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM 
 Stereo signal.
 
 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me 
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back 
 in 1987.
 
 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if 
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or 
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I 
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these 
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've 
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using 
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:
 
 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket 
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is 
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that 
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually 
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with 
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM 
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig 
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled 
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So 
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to 
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
 Reese
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California, there was a
 stero AM station. But I didn't have any stereo AM receivers. But I did 
 have
 two portable radios. I discovered that if you tuned them just right, you
 could get the stereo sound.
 Evan
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:34 PM
 Subject: Stereo AM
 
 
 Back to the glory days of radio smile.
 
 Actually we do have one radio station in Australia to my knowledge that 
 does
 
 broadcast in AM Stereo

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Barry Chapman
Hi Dane,

From Wikipedia:

C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United 
States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 
by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE 
journal.

Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude 
modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.

Barry Chapman

- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
Subject: Re: Stereo AM


Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, that's 
the main one used in Australia.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.

 Barry Chapman

 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.

 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM


 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.

 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.

 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.

 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back
 in 1987.

 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.

 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.


 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:

 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.

 Best regards,

 Steve Jacobson

 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:

 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So
 just
 to confirm what I thought my ear was telling me, I asked my father to
 tell
 me what station the radio was on!  When he said 6500, then I knew and was
 totally amazed at how good it sounded!
 Tom Kaufman

 -Original Message-
 From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Evan
 Reese
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 12:59 PM
 To: PC Audio Discussion List
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM

 Back in the 80s when I was visiting my parents in California

Re: Stereo AM

2014-04-05 Thread Dane Trethowan
Okay fine and I appreciate you looking this up in Wikipedia however not 
everything on Wikipedia is accurate, I know someone else who is well informed 
on this topic and - whilst I'm not disputing the standard used at all - I'm 
curious to know where Motorolla comes into the picture in Australia, I'll 
contribute what I find out to the list.


On 6 Apr 2014, at 1:20 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:

 Hi Dane,
 
 From Wikipedia:
 
 C-QUAM is the method of AM stereo broadcasting used in Canada, the United 
 States and most other countries. It was invented in 1977 
 by Norman Parker, Francis Hilbert and Yoshio Sakaie, and published in an IEEE 
 journal.
 
 Using circuitry developed by Motorola, C-QUAM uses quadrature amplitude 
 modulation (QAM) to encode the stereo separation signal.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 12:46 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Now a question for you, is this the Motoroller standard? If so then yes, 
 that's the main one used in Australia.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 12:41 pm, Barry Chapman ba...@bchapman.id.au wrote:
 
 Yes, Australia used the C-QUAM standard for AM stereo.
 
 Barry Chapman
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Gary Schindler garys5...@comcast.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 11:52 AM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 Maybe the Melbourne station used SeQuam like the system that was adopted in
 the states. Stereo separation was pretty decent and most of the big gun
 radio stations in Pittsburgh broadcast in stereo 24 7. by the late 90's
 stereo AM went buy the wayside like HD AM is pretty much done around here
 now. If KDKA can't make a go or looses interest in the newest form of
 transmission, the others follow suit.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Dane Trethowan grtd...@internode.on.net
 To: PC Audio Discussion List pc-audio@pc-audio.org
 Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2014 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: Stereo AM
 
 
 I think I know the Sony Walkman Stereo AM Walkman you're referring to, its
 easily identifiable by the very large band switch on the face of the radio,
 I used to call that Walkman the Biscuit Radio as the band switch reminded
 me of a chocolate biscuit/cookie smile.
 
 The radio was okay though I thought the smaller Sangean Pocket model had the
 edge, far better sensitivity to start with though - knowing Sangean as I
 do - that's not at all surprising.
 
 I have a couple of Sony AM Stereo tuners though they had to be adjusted to
 get decent clarity out of them, they also exhibited an annoying trait, you
 could hear the 25HZ tone which tells the tuner that the signal is an AM
 Stereo signal.
 
 The other capable Stereo AM tuner I have here is one that I had built for me
 from the information supplied in the electronics magazine Silicon Chip back
 in 1987.
 
 What I like about Stereo AM is that it can be broadcast at any time and - if
 its done properly - the average consumer will not notice any interference or
 odd sound from their standard Mono AM radio, some of the AM Stereo signals I
 used to listen to did exhibit slight bass distortion on a Mono set but these
 signals usually sounded pretty poor when listening on an AM Stereo tuner.
 
 The Melbourne radio station 3UZ had by far the best Stereo AM sound I've
 ever heard - along with Canberra's 2CA -, I don't know what they were using
 on their transmitter but even the mono signal sounded clean and crisp.
 
 
 On 6 Apr 2014, at 5:32 am, Steve Jacobson steve.jacob...@visi.com wrote:
 
 I had a Carver TX11 tuner that received AM stereo and also a Sony pocket
 portable that did.  There is no doubt that the current HD system on AM is
 quieter and better sounding, but one has to have such a
 perfect signal that I find it pretty annoying.  In addition, stations that
 use HD on AM have to restrict their analog audio bandwidth.  I actually
 prefer a noisier but more reliable AM stereo system as was used here
 in the US in the 1980's.  Even more, that system did not interfere with
 adjacent stations as does the HD system does now.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Steve Jacobson
 
 On Sat, 5 Apr 2014 13:09:27 -0400, Tom Kaufman wrote:
 
 In the 90s. WSM (Nashville, Tennessee) was in AM stereo; we had an AM
 stereo
 system in the car (a Lincoln Town Car) I remember riding home from a gig
 and
 would have the Grand Ole Opry on one night; if the station would come in
 just right, the stereo would kick in; it sounded great!  But my first
 experience with hearing AM stereo (again it was with WSM) we had traveled
 to
 Nashville; we had a Lincoln Town Car; I did not realize that the car was
 equipped with AM stereo!  We had stopped to see about getting rooms (my
 father and I stayed in the car and WSM was on the radio.But then I
 noticed it was in stereo, so I figured no; that couldn't be WSM!  So
 just
 to confirm what I