Re: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES

2004-09-06 Thread Dane Trethowan
 the file
size. This option sets the criteria used to determine when to
increase the bit-rate for a frame. The lower the number, the lower
the criteria will be. Thus VBR_0 will yield the best quality (but
the largest file size) while VBR_9 will have less sound quality but
the file size will be the smallest. The recommended variable
bit-rate option is VBR_4. If you don't want VBR encoding, set this
option to None.



Private



When enabled, it will set the private flag in the MP3 stream.



Original



When enabled, it will set the original flag in the MP3 stream.



Copyright



When enabled, it will set the copyright flag in the MP3 stream.



Checksum



When enabled, it will add a cyclic redundancy check (CRC) code in
each frame, allowing  [the decoding software] to detect transmission
errors that could occur on the MP3 stream. However, it takes 16 bits
per frame that would otherwise be used for encoding, and therefore
will slightly (probably imperceptibly) reduce the sound quality.




E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES


 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Ok! well I have a comment to make on this subject.
 
  What you said below seems very general, I mean their are
  different things that people may want to encode, (music and
  speech for example) and (from what I understand) ABR will not
  work too well with music (VBR is supposed to work better) so you
  can see my concern when a manual for a product recommends one
  form of encoding over another in this way, if the manual actually
  provides some background information as to why the recommendation
  is made then fare enough.
 
  Secondly, without casting any doubts or making any criticisms
  towards 
CDEX,
  I ask the question, just how old is the manual we're referring
  to.  Its over 18 months since I've used CDEX and allot has
  changed in that period 
of
  time with LAME, allot of work has gone into improving the whole
  LAME software so what the manual says about LAME may not be
  accurate any 
longer,
  of course (me having not used CDEX for such a long time, I've
  lost touch and (for all I know) their may ahve been subsequent
  update releases of 
CDEX
  too!).
 
  Now ABR and VBR, 2 very different systems.  ABR works out the
  average bit rate of a file and encodes it that way where as VBR
  works on each frame of the file and encodes each frame to the
  best bit rate appropriate to that frame, if you have silence then
  encoding drops down to the minimum set (by default this is
  32KBPS).
 
  The settings I spoke of in my original message were designed to
  get 
maximum
  compression and quality using VBR, if the quality setting is
  either too high or too low you either end up with a small file of
  lousy quality or a massive file of good quAlity audio, people are
  under the impression that (with the VBR method) the higher the
  quality number the better the quality encoding so I was just
  making the point that the quality setting doesn't work as simply
  as that.
 
01:55 AM 2/09/2004 -0400, you wrote:
  Hi all.   I hear in the CDex manual that abr is maybe better
  than vbr. 
If
  you use variable bit rate, you should use the average bit rate,
  or abr. - Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:18 AM
  Subject: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES
  
  
  
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
  
  Greetings!
  
  Sorry! I'm all over the place with e-mail at the moment.
  
  Some time ago, someone on list asked about VBR quality with
  LAME, they 
said
  that they were getting mixed results with a quality figure of
  9.  
  
  This will indeed be the case as (with the VBR encoding) 9 is
  the worst quality you can use.  The quality for VBR encoding is
  slightly different 
to
  that of Constant bit rate encoding, the quality setting for VBR
  encoding  affects both the encoded audio nad the size of the
  file thus 
the
  best quality figure is probably about 5, where you get maximum
  quality 
and
  maximum compression.
  
  LAME boasts 2 VBR methods, OLD and NEW, NEW, is very fast
  but 
doesn't
  produce as good a results as does OLD, which is considerably
  slower.  Naturally! this situation will change as time goes on.
  
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: PGP 8.0.3
  Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon
  Smith  
  
  iQA/AwUBQTWv/SlBPqY64aUBEQKe9wCgzRz2ovd02UaAewsN5eY0A4cVmsgAoOU7
  P+lBFteSR0VToI4YkfrZz8ae
  =Dv1v
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
  
  
  ___
  PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
  http://www.pc-audio.org
  
  To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
  [EMAIL

Re: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES

2004-09-03 Thread Gary Wood
Hi Dane.  Well it seems like when you go to variable bit rate settings, it 
did go from 0 to 9.  I used to use 9, but think better of that now, so for 
now, I'll go to 5, but there is a place in CDex where it says vbr-abr, or 
something like that.  Maybe someone who uses CDex could explain it better.
- Original Message - 
From: Dane Trethowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PC audio discussion list.  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:00 AM
Subject: Re: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok! well I have a comment to make on this subject.
What you said below seems very general, I mean their are different things
that people may want to encode, (music and speech for example) and (from
what I understand) ABR will not work too well with music (VBR is supposed
to work better) so you can see my concern when a manual for a product
recommends one form of encoding over another in this way, if the manual
actually provides some background information as to why the recommendation
is made then fare enough.
Secondly, without casting any doubts or making any criticisms towards 
CDEX,
I ask the question, just how old is the manual we're referring to.  Its
over 18 months since I've used CDEX and allot has changed in that period 
of
time with LAME, allot of work has gone into improving the whole LAME
software so what the manual says about LAME may not be accurate any 
longer,
of course (me having not used CDEX for such a long time, I've lost touch
and (for all I know) their may ahve been subsequent update releases of 
CDEX
too!).

Now ABR and VBR, 2 very different systems.  ABR works out the average bit
rate of a file and encodes it that way where as VBR works on each frame of
the file and encodes each frame to the best bit rate appropriate to that
frame, if you have silence then encoding drops down to the minimum set (by
default this is 32KBPS).
The settings I spoke of in my original message were designed to get 
maximum
compression and quality using VBR, if the quality setting is either too
high or too low you either end up with a small file of lousy quality or a
massive file of good quAlity audio, people are under the impression that
(with the VBR method) the higher the quality number the better the quality
encoding so I was just making the point that the quality setting doesn't
work as simply as that.

 01:55 AM 2/09/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi all.   I hear in the CDex manual that abr is maybe better than vbr.  If
you use variable bit rate, you should use the average bit rate, or abr.
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings!
Sorry! I'm all over the place with e-mail at the moment.
Some time ago, someone on list asked about VBR quality with LAME, they 
said
that they were getting mixed results with a quality figure of 9.

This will indeed be the case as (with the VBR encoding) 9 is the worst
quality you can use.  The quality for VBR encoding is slightly different 
to
that of Constant bit rate encoding, the quality setting for VBR
encoding  affects both the encoded audio nad the size of the file thus 
the
best quality figure is probably about 5, where you get maximum quality 
and
maximum compression.

LAME boasts 2 VBR methods, OLD and NEW, NEW, is very fast but 
doesn't
produce as good a results as does OLD, which is considerably
slower.  Naturally! this situation will change as time goes on.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith
iQA/AwUBQTWv/SlBPqY64aUBEQKe9wCgzRz2ovd02UaAewsN5eY0A4cVmsgAoOU7
P+lBFteSR0VToI4YkfrZz8ae
=Dv1v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith
iQA/AwUBQTbFEilBPqY64aUBEQKnYgCg8m+1HlZOdMXrJg+wMYvn5qqO1zwAnjlq
FP2HtteoFEwCuDcauS7UuKTX
=FJ8D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES

2004-09-02 Thread Dane Trethowan

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ok! well I have a comment to make on this subject.

What you said below seems very general, I mean their are different things 
that people may want to encode, (music and speech for example) and (from 
what I understand) ABR will not work too well with music (VBR is supposed 
to work better) so you can see my concern when a manual for a product 
recommends one form of encoding over another in this way, if the manual 
actually provides some background information as to why the recommendation 
is made then fare enough.

Secondly, without casting any doubts or making any criticisms towards CDEX, 
I ask the question, just how old is the manual we're referring to.  Its 
over 18 months since I've used CDEX and allot has changed in that period of 
time with LAME, allot of work has gone into improving the whole LAME 
software so what the manual says about LAME may not be accurate any longer, 
of course (me having not used CDEX for such a long time, I've lost touch 
and (for all I know) their may ahve been subsequent update releases of CDEX 
too!).

Now ABR and VBR, 2 very different systems.  ABR works out the average bit 
rate of a file and encodes it that way where as VBR works on each frame of 
the file and encodes each frame to the best bit rate appropriate to that 
frame, if you have silence then encoding drops down to the minimum set (by 
default this is 32KBPS).

The settings I spoke of in my original message were designed to get maximum 
compression and quality using VBR, if the quality setting is either too 
high or too low you either end up with a small file of lousy quality or a 
massive file of good quAlity audio, people are under the impression that 
(with the VBR method) the higher the quality number the better the quality 
encoding so I was just making the point that the quality setting doesn't 
work as simply as that.

  01:55 AM 2/09/2004 -0400, you wrote:
Hi all.   I hear in the CDex manual that abr is maybe better than vbr.  If 
you use variable bit rate, you should use the average bit rate, or abr.
- Original Message - From: Dane Trethowan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 7:18 AM
Subject: VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES



-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings!

Sorry! I'm all over the place with e-mail at the moment.

Some time ago, someone on list asked about VBR quality with LAME, they said
that they were getting mixed results with a quality figure of 9.

This will indeed be the case as (with the VBR encoding) 9 is the worst
quality you can use.  The quality for VBR encoding is slightly different to
that of Constant bit rate encoding, the quality setting for VBR
encoding  affects both the encoded audio nad the size of the file thus the
best quality figure is probably about 5, where you get maximum quality and
maximum compression.

LAME boasts 2 VBR methods, OLD and NEW, NEW, is very fast but doesn't
produce as good a results as does OLD, which is considerably
slower.  Naturally! this situation will change as time goes on.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith

iQA/AwUBQTWv/SlBPqY64aUBEQKe9wCgzRz2ovd02UaAewsN5eY0A4cVmsgAoOU7
P+lBFteSR0VToI4YkfrZz8ae
=Dv1v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith

iQA/AwUBQTbFEilBPqY64aUBEQKnYgCg8m+1HlZOdMXrJg+wMYvn5qqO1zwAnjlq
FP2HtteoFEwCuDcauS7UuKTX
=FJ8D
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


VARIABLE BIT RATES WITH LAME, SOME NOTES

2004-09-01 Thread Dane Trethowan

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Greetings!

Sorry! I'm all over the place with e-mail at the moment.

Some time ago, someone on list asked about VBR quality with LAME, they said 
that they were getting mixed results with a quality figure of 9.

This will indeed be the case as (with the VBR encoding) 9 is the worst 
quality you can use.  The quality for VBR encoding is slightly different to 
that of Constant bit rate encoding, the quality setting for VBR 
encoding  affects both the encoded audio nad the size of the file thus the 
best quality figure is probably about 5, where you get maximum quality and 
maximum compression.

LAME boasts 2 VBR methods, OLD and NEW, NEW, is very fast but doesn't 
produce as good a results as does OLD, which is considerably 
slower.  Naturally! this situation will change as time goes on.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.0.3
Comment: Dane Trethowan, a client of TFT-BBS run by Gordon Smith

iQA/AwUBQTWv/SlBPqY64aUBEQKe9wCgzRz2ovd02UaAewsN5eY0A4cVmsgAoOU7
P+lBFteSR0VToI4YkfrZz8ae
=Dv1v
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... 
http://www.pc-audio.org

To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]