Hi Dima,
Am 13.06.2008 um 21:48 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wondering how one deals with patching servers that have root disks
encap'd with vxvm?
Basically this is the same as for unmirrored disks.
Espesially when root disk has non-encapsulated volumes on it?
The root-disk can not have
Hi Dima,
Am 16.06.2008 um 15:19 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
By un-encapsulated volumes I mean the volumes not created as a
result of root disk encapsulation.
For example your root disk initially has 2 native partitions, say /
and /var.
After root disk encapsulation u end up having 2 volumes,
Hi Martin,
Am 28.08.2008 um 11:37 schrieb Martin Paul:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you're always using an out of date patchdiag.xref file, how can
you tell
what patches you're behind on on every client machine? I think
the main issue
I'm having is that I want to compare to BOTH the latest
Hi Rajiv,
Am 27.11.2008 um 12:36 schrieb Rajiv Gunja:
Last I read on sunsolve and bigadmin, SUN no longer wants to do
large patches. They want to release smaller patches which fixes 1
particular thing than have 1 huge one fixing a lot of related
issues. They called it rejuvenation patch.
Hi Martin,
Am 28.11.2008 um 11:56 schrieb Martin Paul:
The fact that patch properties are missing is one of my biggest
gripes about the xref file.
How about adding a feature that generates a patchdiag.xref+ file
on the proxy with information from the patches added?
Best regards
-- Dago
Hi Techie,
Am 18.08.2009 um 18:01 schrieb Techie:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Allen Eastwoodmi...@paconet.us
wrote:
pca -d will download the patches to your patchdir as .zip files,
just like
if you had d/l's them from Sun manually.
You can use any valid patch method to install the
Hi Martin,
Am 21.07.2010 um 10:21 schrieb Dominique Frise dominique.fr...@unil.ch:
Hi,
This morning (10:20:08 AM CEST), we are unable to download following patches:
122212-41 GNOME 2.6.0: GNOME Desktop Patch and
122213-41 GNOME 2.6.0_x86: GNOME Desktop Patch
# pca -Vi mrs
...
Trying
Hi,
I have a problem installing a patch (with PCA, but PCA works as
expected):
Installing 124868-14 (3/5)
Unzipping patch
Checking for reboot/reconfig in patchinfo
Running patchadd
Starting patchadd at Tue Aug 10 16:39:05 2010
/usr/sbin/patchadd /tmp/pca.128145114524626/124868-14
Hi,
Am 10.08.2010 um 16:49 schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
I have a problem installing a patch (with PCA, but PCA works as
expected):
Installing 124868-14 (3/5)
This is obviously the same issue as the previously discussed 124867-15
which I just remembered :-/
Sorry for the noise
Hi Dennis,
Am 11.08.2010 um 04:47 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
I have a problem installing a patch (with PCA, but PCA works as
expected):
...
I already tried removing/reinstalling the 126498-02 and the previous
rev 124868-13
with no luck. There also doesn't seem to be an open issue on this at
Hi Madhu,
Am 11.09.2010 um 12:51 schrieb madhu jaya:
I am new to use PCA. Please Clarify the following question below:
At first let me say it is not wise to reply to your invitation
with your password included. I suggest changing it immediately
now everyone has seen it.
1. How to
Hi,
Am 12.05.2011 um 13:44 schrieb French, David:
Ø Gyula Szekely said Thursday, May 12, 2011 4:29 AM
Ø Subject: [pca] downloading a patch with dependencies
Ø
Ø What I did was: write in the patchdiag.xref file only the patch that I
needed to download, and requested the analysis and
Hi Dennis,
Am 19.03.2012 um 01:24 schrieb Dennis Clarke:
Patch Synopsis
- ---
123246-07 Sun StorEdge Availability Suite 4.0: Patch for Solaris 10
... seems to be unavailable under a typical Solaris support contract.
So
Hi Francois,
Am 18.04.2012 um 21:27 schrieb Francois:
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Jeff Wieland wrote:
Paul B. Henson wrote:
On 4/18/2012 8:14 AM, McGraw, Robert P wrote:
I submitted a SR to Oracle about this and they told me they were working
on a patch and they would let me know when it was ready.
Hi,
Am 19.04.2012 um 17:03 schrieb Fay, Sean:
One wish I have though is perhaps there is a way to mass load a patch list on
the site. For instance, I had approximately 70 patches to input and it seemed
to take a considerable amount of time and clicking. If I had the patches I
want (with
Hi Chris,
Am 10.07.2012 um 19:57 schrieb Chris Elfers:
When we began our current patch cycle with all Veritas patches in our
bundle, we noticed that PCA was attempting to add all Veritas patches
regardless of OS. Because of the previously mentioned patchdiag.xref issue
where Oracle
Hi Jamen,
Am 16.01.2013 um 19:38 schrieb McGranahan, Jamen
jamen.mcgrana...@vanderbilt.edu:
Is there a way I can force patchadd to look in a different directory than the
default /var/sadm/pkg directory? We created a softlink from /var/sadm/pkg to
/apps/sadm/pkg (due to space issues), but
Hi Drew,
Am 18.06.2013 um 17:25 schrieb askin...@symcor.com:
Recommend you attach with a -u (lowercase) unless you want to copy down all
of /opt as well.
Just for clarification: -U applies all applicable patches to the attached zone,
whereas
-u just applies the minimal set of patches
Hi Al,
Am 13.02.2014 um 17:44 schrieb Al Ishmael al.ishm...@toyota-fs.com:
Hello Dagobert,
I have just started using the PCA patching tool for our Solaris estate. I’m
having a few teething problems with it so I thought I’d ask for a little
guidance.
I am just packaging up PCA, so I took
Hi,
Am 17.02.2014 um 10:04 schrieb Martin Paul martin.p...@univie.ac.at:
I don't have a straight solution for your task, but here are some ideas:
1) Is there any better way to do it?
Try using pca --minimal missingr. The minimal option will make PCA work
with the list of patches in the
Hi Martin,
Am 17.02.2014 um 11:31 schrieb Martin Paul martin.p...@univie.ac.at:
Am 17.02.2014 11:02, schrieb Dagobert Michelsen:
Isn’t mkxref from
http://www.par.univie.ac.at/solaris/pca/contrib.html
exactly what you are looking for?
That's a script written by me? I'm getting old
Hi Michael,
Am 09.05.2017 um 00:30 schrieb noskcaJ leahciM
:
> Tried to do this but was unable as there are 2 things which must happen:
> 1) you must agree to accept the license
> 2) you must log into MOS
>
> Even with the command line:
>
22 matches
Mail list logo