Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi WG, I (as a coauthor) support the adoption of this document. Best regards, Jie 发件人：julien.meuric 收件人：pce 时 间：2020-01-17 18:13:12 主 题：[Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06? Hi all, It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06. Do you believe the I-D is

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applies to this document. Best regards, Jie 发件人：Hariharan Ananthakrishnan 收件人：Chengli (Cheng Li) ;Mach Chen ;Weiqiang Cheng ;Lizhenbin ;Dongjie (Jimmy) ;Rakesh Gandhi ;xiong.quan 抄 送：pce 时 间：2020-01-18 02:31:59 主 题：IPR Poll on

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Dear All, I've read the draft and support its adoption. Regards, Greg On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:12 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > It is time to share your thoughts about draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06. > Do you believe the I-D is a right foundation for a PCE WG item? Please > use the PCE mailing list

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi Rakesh, Thanks for the reply and input. I initially had the same thought as well: "just migrate both sides at the same time". Only concern is of course some migration strategies choose to migrate regionally or node-by-node, rather than tunnel pairs. In this case, definitely will have to do

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

Hi Hari, I am aware of an IPR applicable to this draft, and it has already been disclosed to the IETF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3978/ Thanks, Rakesh On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:32 PM Hariharan Ananthakrishnan wrote: > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for Working Group adoption on this

[Pce] IPR Disclosure Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path

Dear Cheng Li, Mach Chen, Weiqiang Cheng, Zhenbin Li, Jie Dong, Rakesh Gandhi, Quan Xiong: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) Paths" (draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat

[Pce] IPR Disclosure Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Statement about IPR related to draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path

Dear Cheng Li, Mach Chen, Weiqiang Cheng, Zhenbin Li, Jie Dong, Rakesh Gandhi, Quan Xiong: An IPR disclosure that pertains to your Internet-Draft entitled "PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Segment Routing (SR) Paths" (draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path) was submitted to the IETF Secretariat

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-01.txt

Hey WG! Changes here are to address comments (and a Discuss) from the IESG. The best thing to do (if you care) is to look at the diffs in the datatracker. Questions and comments are (of course) welcome. Best, Adrian -Original Message- From: I-D-Announce On Behalf Of

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-flags-01.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags Author : Adrian Farrel

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi Andrew, Many thanks for your review comments. Please see below with .. On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:57 PM Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) < andrew.st...@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi Dhruv, > > Thanks again for the speedy reply. Comments below under > > Cheers > Andrew > > On 2020-01-22, 8:01 AM,

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi Huanan, Thank you for your support. Do you mean how bidirectional SR would work with path protection as in: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection-11 If yes, both are complementary. We can add text to indicate so. Thanks, Rakesh On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 10:53 PM