I am interested in working on this draft.
Thanks
Gyan
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 11:21 PM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> I support WG adoption of this important draft for instantiation of ECMP
> multipath by encoding multiple segments lists of an SR candidate path.
>
> Gyan
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at
I support WG adoption of this important draft for instantiation of ECMP
multipath by encoding multiple segments lists of an SR candidate path.
Gyan
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 8:50 PM Tarek Saad wrote:
> I support adoption of this draft as coauthor. This is important to support
> the signaling of
I support adoption of this draft as coauthor. This is important to support the
signaling of multi path LSP with per path attributes in PCEP.
Regards,
Tarek
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 14, 2021, at 10:53 AM, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email begins the WG adoption poll for
Yes/support
Regards,
Jeff
> On Apr 14, 2021, at 09:00, Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi WG
>
> +1. Support adoption. Provides a nice and simple way to encode multiple
> paths, whether they be weighted or for backup purposes. Fills needed gaps in
> the Unicast SR
Support as a co-author.
Thanks,
Siva
From: Bidgoli, Hooman (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 12:55 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] RE: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Support as co-author
Support as co-author
Thanks
Hooman
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for
Hi WG
+1. Support adoption. Provides a nice and simple way to encode multiple paths,
whether they be weighted or for backup purposes. Fills needed gaps in the
Unicast SR Policy and P2MP SR Policy documents.
Thanks
Andrew
From: Pce on behalf of "Samuel Sidor (ssidor)"
Date: Wednesday,
Hi WG,
As a co-author, I support the adoption of this draft by PCE WG. The draft
provides a generic way to represent multiple paths that taken together satisfy
the given computation constraints/objectives.
Thanks,
Mike.
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 AM
To:
Hi WG,
I support adoption of this draft.
Regards,
Samuel
From: Pce On Behalf Of Yadav, Bhupendra
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 5:14 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] [**EXTERNAL**] WG Adoption of
draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Hi WG,
I support adoption of this draft by PCE WG. This draft provides a clean and
logical mechanism for conveying multiple paths peers.
I am willing to work on this draft.
Thanks,
Bhupendra
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: April 14, 2021 10:52 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc:
The PCE WG has placed draft-koldychev-pce-multipath in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Dhruv Dhody)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath/
___
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF.
Title : Carrying Binding Label/Segment Identifier in
PCE-based Networks.
Authors : Siva Sivabalan
Hi WG,
We did not hear any objections and thus we request the authors to post
an update with a new R flag in TE-PATH-BINDING TLV as well as all the
other previously agreed changes. Regarding the term "binding label/SID",
we leave it to the authors' discretion and any further AD/IESG comment
on
14 matches
Mail list logo
