Re: [Pce] draft-rajagapolan-pce-pcep-color-00 -- Placement of the color TLV

2022-01-18 Thread Balaji Rajagopalan
Hi, Would like to follow up on my earlier request in the email below for WG adoption of this draft. We’ve addressed all the comments received so far, and it appears that the draft is stable enough for WG adoption. Happy to hear further comments/suggestions. -- Balaji Rajagopalan From: Pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

2022-01-18 Thread Zafar Ali (zali)
Dear chairs and the WG, I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this draft Thanks Regards … Zafar From: Zhenghaomian Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:04 PM To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan , "Zafar Ali (zali)" , "victor.lopezalva...@telefonica.com" , "younglee...@gmail.com"

[Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

2022-01-18 Thread Zhenghaomian
Hi Folks, I have read the latest version of the document, it is very useful for the PCEP applicability in GMPLS-based network, and we can foresee some future extensions. I believe it is ready for publication. Thank you. Best wishes, Haomian (as co-author) 发件人: Pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

2022-01-18 Thread Zhenghaomian
Yes, I am aware of the IPRs applicable to this draft, and they have already been disclosed to the IETF. I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft other than those have been disclosed. Best wishes, Haomian 发件人: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] 发送时间: 2022年1月19日 1:20

[Pce] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

2022-01-18 Thread Hariharan Ananthakrishnan
Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of: I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed

[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

2022-01-18 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi WG, This email starts a 2-weeks working group last call for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16 [1]. Please indicate your support or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it, please indicate that

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec-00.txt

2022-01-18 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element WG of the IETF. Title : PCEP Extension for L2 Flow Specification Authors : Dhruv Dhody Adrian

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

2022-01-18 Thread julien.meuric
Hi PCE'rs, Thank you for the feedback. This extension is readopted as a WG item in a dedicated document. Authors, please post a draft-ietf-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec-00. Cheers, Julien On 06/01/2022 13:57, julien.meu...@orange.com wrote: Hi all and best wishes for 2022. Gentle reminder: we