Thanks Dhruv!
Noted, we will continue with the analysis, my expectation is to report the
progress at IETF 119 so I can provide more info about the analysis
Thanks again,
Luis
De: Dhruv Dhody
Enviado el: martes, 27 de febrero de 2024 6:17
Para: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
CC: Dhruv Dhody ;
Hi Luis,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:59 PM LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO <
luismiguel.contrerasmuri...@telefonica.com> wrote:
> Hi Dhruv,
>
>
>
> Sorry for my late response.
>
>
>
> In version -01 we proposed a new METRIC Object-type within the existing
> object-class, but after internal analysis
Hi Dhruv,
Sorry for my late response.
In version -01 we proposed a new METRIC Object-type within the existing
object-class, but after internal analysis we decided to propose a new object in
this version -02. We think is much cleaner approach and allows to re-use
attributes already defined.
Hi,
I’m not aware about any IPR related to this document
From: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 6:56 PM
To: pce@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; Cheng Li ; zhenghaomian
; slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Subject: IPR poll for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional
Hi
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-04.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the
IETF.
Title: PCEP extensions for Circuit Style Policies
Authors: Samuel Sidor
Praveen Maheshwari
Andrew Stone
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment-09.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension
for Path Segment in Segment Routing (SR)
Authors: Cheng Li
