[Pce] Jari Arkko's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18: (with COMMENT)

Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Pce] Jari Arkko's Yes on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Thanks. This all makes sense. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

[Pce] Jari Arkko's Yes on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: (with COMMENT)

Jari Arkko has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-service-aware-12: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [Pce] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-15

Thank you Robert for the review, and thank you authors for the updates in -15! I have balloted no-obj for this document in today’s IESG telechat. Jari On 21 Nov 2014, at 21:19, Robert Sparks rjspa...@nostrum.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on

Re: [Pce] [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints-11

Thanks for your review, Robert! I have balloted no-objection for this draft on the upcoming IESG telechat. #begin non-blocking-comment For what it is worth, I agree with Robert's comment that some highlighting of the interoperability challenges of vendor-specific options might have been