for this thread.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
> From: "Samuel Sidor (ssidor)"
> Date: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 at 4:36 AM
> To: Dhruv Dhody , Vishnu Pavan Beeram
> , "Andrew Stone (Nokia)"
> Cc: "pce@ietf.org" ,
> "draft-ietf-pce-loca
-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcem...@ietf.org"
Subject: RE: [Pce] Question on draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement
Hi Dhruv, Vishnu,
“I think we can differentiate between an implementation that supports this
extension - that MUST use UNPROTECTED PREFERRED whereas a legac
rew to comment as he is main author.
Regards,
Samuel
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 9:29 AM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] Question on draft-ietf-pce-local-protection-enforcement
Hi Pavan,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:46 PM Vis
Hi Pavan,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:46 PM Vishnu Pavan Beeram
wrote:
> Dhruv, Hi!
>
> Thanks for the response! Please see inline..
>
> Regards,
> -Pavan
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:03 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
>> Hi Pavan,
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <
>>
Dhruv, Hi!
Thanks for the response! Please see inline..
Regards,
-Pavan
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:03 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Pavan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <
> vishnupa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to get some clarification on the text below
Hi Pavan,
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 11:02 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram
wrote:
> I would like to get some clarification on the text below (understand that
> a publication request has been made for the draft).
>
> **
> From Section 5:
>
>When L-flag is not set and E-flag is not set then PCE SHOULD
I would like to get some clarification on the text below (understand that a
publication request has been made for the draft).
**
>From Section 5:
When L-flag is not set and E-flag is not set then PCE SHOULD consider
the protection eligibility as UNPROTECTED PREFERRED but MAY consider
