: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:24 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi Dhruv
I reviewed the draft and support WG adoption.
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
Yes
Please state your reasons
) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com]
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 10:31 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi PCE WG
Support adoption, seems reasonable to relay path MTU as status information and
criteria/constraint in
...@tsinghua.org.cn]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:37 AM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody' ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi, Dhruv:
I have read this document and support it adoption.
Some suggestions for the current conten
Hi Dhruv,
As an author of this draft, I would like to thank the Chairs of both WGs for
the guidance. We will post the PCE document and start drafting the SPRING one.
Thank you!
Best Regards,
Shuping
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 11:17 AM
To: pce@ietf
Hi WG,
Thanks for providing your feedback and discussion on the adoption of this
draft.
The discussion on this thread as well as a chat with the SPRING chairs
confirms the need for a document in the SPRING WG that can be referred to
by the protocol extensions in PCE (and IDR). There is also no op
Dear PCE Chairs
After the discussion thread with Ketan we are now in sync and I have agreed
to work with the authors of the IDR and PCE draft in a collaborative effort
on publishing a draft in SPRING WG that addresses PMTU in SR Policy and
Fragmentation in SR policy.
I have discussed with the PC
Hi Ketan
Please see in-line below Gyan2.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:32 AM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
> Please check inline below with KT2.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 1:07 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>> Hi Ketan
>>
>> Please see in-line
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:10 A
Hi Gyan,
Please check inline below with KT2.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 1:07 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
> Hi Ketan
>
> Please see in-line
>
> Thanks
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:10 AM Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gyan,
>>
>> Please check inline below.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:08 AM G
Hi Ketan
Please see in-line
Thanks
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 7:10 AM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
> Hi Gyan,
>
> Please check inline below.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:08 AM Gyan Mishra
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi Ketan
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:05 AM Ketan Talaulikar
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
Hi Gyan,
Please check inline below.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:08 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> Hi Ketan
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:05 AM Ketan Talaulikar
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I do not believe this document is ready for adoption. I believe the WG
>> perhaps needs to discuss some basic
Hi Ketan
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 10:05 AM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do not believe this document is ready for adoption. I believe the WG
> perhaps needs to discuss some basic concepts before taking up this work.
>
> Please note that I do not object to (what I infer is) the motivatio
Email: wangmin...@chinamobile.com
-
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2022-03-29 00:09
To: pce@ietf.org
CC: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
y
发送时间： 2022-03-29 00:11:30
收件人： pce@ietf.org
抄送： draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
主题： [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/
Should this dra
Ketan
>
>
> 3) Yes, this is applicable for both RSVP-TE and SR Policy.
>
>
>
> Thank you!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Shuping
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ketan Talaulikar [mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 4, 2
[mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2022 10:05 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hello,
I do not believe this document is ready for adoption. I believe the WG perhaps
needs to discuss
Hello,
I do not believe this document is ready for adoption. I believe the WG
perhaps needs to discuss some basic concepts before taking up this work.
Please note that I do not object to (what I infer is) the motivation for
this work. This document is not (yet) a good starting point for this work
: Pce on behalf of Dhruv Dhody
Date: Monday, March 28, 2022 at 12:10 PM
To: "pce@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org"
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.
https://da
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft
As an operator, this a very important feature to have.
Warm regards,
Luc-Fabrice
Ndifor
Specialist - IP Access and Data center
luc-fabrice.ndi...@mtn.com
T +237 677 55 02 13
Head Office: 360, Rue Drouot
P.O. Box 15 574 Douala, Cameroon
T +237 679 00
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
It provides a useful approach to carry path MTU in PCEP messages.
Regards,
Fan
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-li
willing to review the future versions of this document.
Best regards,
Jie
From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG
Hi Dhruv
I reviewed the draft and support WG adoption.
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG?
Yes
Please state your reasons - Why / Why not?
This documents PCEP PMTU extension is valuable for any operator deployments
of SR-MPLS or SRv6 and/or uses SR-TE and want to ensure that fragmentati
Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li
I support the adoption. Passing PMTU through PCEP is a very important extension
for SR TE LSP.
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 12:09 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-p...@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05
Hi WG,
This
Hi WG,
This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu/
Should this draft be adopted by the PCE WG? Please state your reasons - Why
/ Why not? What needs to be fixed before or after adoption? Are you willing
to work on
24 matches
Mail list logo
