] On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 4:04 PM
To: Dhruv Dhody ; pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi,
I have read this draft, and I support this document being
Message-
From: Aijun Wang [mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:37 AM
To: 'Dhruv Dhody'
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; 'pce-chairs'
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi, Dhruv:
Reusing "Associ
Hi WG,
The WG LC is closed, we have support to move the document along the
publication process. Thanks to everyone who responded. Hari has agreed to
shepherd this I-D. (Thanks Hari!)
Authors,
Please post an update, handling all comments received.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at
@dhruvdhody.com]
>
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 7:04 PM
>
> To: Aijun Wang
>
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs <
> pce-cha...@ietf.org>
>
> Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
>
&g
na Telecom
-Original Message-
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 7:04 PM
To: Aijun Wang
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi Aijun,
See inline.
draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
>
> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
> [1]. Please indicate your support or concer
:) ]
>
> Best Regards
>
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 12:40 PM
> To: Aijun Wang
> Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; p
document borrowed some of "
Best regards,
Shuping
> -Original Message-
> From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
>
> Subj
Aijun Wang
Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi Aijun,
Thank you for your comments.
I wanted to focus on the 3rd point. I remember this being discussed perhaps in
the previous incarnation of
Support as a co-author.
Thanks,
Siva
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:13 AM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support
> or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
> the
draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
>
> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or
> concern for this draft
; Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs <
> pce-cha...@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi WG,
This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or concern
for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of the draft to RFC,
please articulate your concern. If you support
chairs
时 间：2020-09-04 13:14:26
主 题：[Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi WG,
This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support
or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
the draft to RFC,
<
> pce-cha...@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or
> concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the
ize this?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv
> Dhody
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:42 PM
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Cc: dr
ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi WG,
A reminder to the WG to be more vocal. I am copying this slide from the
chair's WG status slide
[https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-pce-1-introduction-0
1]
> Please be Vocal
>
>
an be used, but the draft should make that explicit, for example
in Figure 1.
Thanks,
Mike.
-Original Message-
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 AM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draf
Hi WG,
A reminder to the WG to be more vocal. I am copying this slide from
the chair's WG status slide
[https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/108/slides/slides-108-pce-1-introduction-01]
> Please be Vocal
>
> o During WG Adoption and WG LC calls, the response is less.
>
> o Please be vocal on the
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-chairs
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy
Hi WG,
This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support or concern
for this draft. If you
Support as co-author
Cheers,
Jeff
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 07:13, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
> Hi WG,
>
> This email starts a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support
> or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
> the
Hi WG,
This email starts a working group last call for
draft-ietf-pce-association-policy [1]. Please indicate your support
or concern for this draft. If you are opposed to the progression of
the draft to RFC, please articulate your concern. If you support it,
please indicate that you have read
22 matches
Mail list logo
