Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04

Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. BR Daniele From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: den 18 december 2020 23:12 To: olivier.dug...@orange-ftgroup.com; Julien Meuric ; Daniele Ceccarelli ; younglee

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-dugeon-pce-stateful-interdomain-04

Hi Dhruv, Julien, Thanks for extending the deadline. I support the adoption of the draft. Inter domain stateful PCE capabilities are extremely important in the provisioning of end to end services. (tried a work around to avoid mentioning network slicing) . BR Daniele -Original Message--

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-stateful-pce-gmpls-16

Hi WG, In CCAMP we’re obviously very interested in this draft. I reviewed it before the last call and expressed my support, which is still valid for the latest version. BR Daniele From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: den 18 januari 2022 14:17 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-statef

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-05

Hi Dhruv, all, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. BR Daniele From: Dhruv Dhody Sent: den 22 februari 2022 13:24 To: Young Lee ; zhenghaom...@huawei.com; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: pce@ietf.org; pce-chairs Subject: IPR

Re: [Pce] IPR poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

Hi Andrew, - I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules Thanks Daniele Il Ven 5 Apr 2024, 17:14 Andrew Stone (Nokia) ha scritto: > Hi Authors, > > In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and > contri

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06

Yes/Support BR Daniele -Original Message- From: pce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: martedì 20 settembre 2011 17.08 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-06 Hi PCE WG. The framework for hierarchical PCE

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-lee-pce-transporting-te-data-00.txt

Hi authors, I agree with Xian, very interesting draft. In the intro you say that participating in IGP is cumbersome for a number of reasons (significant traffic load, need for multiple IGP implementations), but I think one of the main reasons which IMHO should be added is "time". IGPs can take

Re: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as PCE WG Document

Yes, support BR Daniele > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of JP Vasseur (jvasseur) > Sent: domenica 14 settembre 2014 12:06 > To: pce@ietf.org > Subject: [Pce] Adopting of draft-sivabalan-pce-segment-routing-03.txt as > PCE WG Document > > Dear WG,

Re: [Pce] [Teas] Architectural question about resource-scheduled LSPs

Hi Adrian, Thanks for the excellent analysis and summary. I think that distributing the time reservation info just to the PCC and then realigning the other PCEs is the best option. Performing a realignment via IGP can cause scalability issues as you said (maybe BGP could be the only appropriat

Re: [Pce] [Teas] Architectural question about resource-scheduled LSPs

Hi Dieter, In line. BR Daniele From: Dieter Beller [mailto:dieter.bel...@alcatel-lucent.com] Sent: venerdì 24 luglio 2015 07:47 To: Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: adr...@olddog.co.uk; pce@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Teas] Architectural question about resource-scheduled LSPs Hi Daniele

Re: [Pce] Initial version for liaison text //答复: CALL FOR VOLUNTEER - New Liaison Statement, "Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces"

that need to be updated, which might be > relevant to your project, but this work in CCAMP is still in individual drafts > stage. We would like to receive your input. > == > ======== > > Thanks. > > Best wishes, > Haomian > > -

Re: [Pce] Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group-03

Hi J3P and WG, Yes, I think the draft should be adopted as WG item. BR Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of wang.qi...@zte.com.cn Sent: mercoledì 4 novembre 2015 09:44 To: Julien Meuric; pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group

Re: [Pce] Initial version for liaison text: New Liaison Statement, "Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces"

mailing list without the need for a formal liaison.” Thanks Daniele & Fatai From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: domenica 1 novembre 2015 04:27 To: Zhenghaomian; 'cc...@ietf.org'; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG Subject: Re: [Teas] Initial version for lia

Re: [Pce] 答复: Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-association-group-03

I think the document is a good starting point for WG work, hence support its adoption. BR Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhenghaomian Sent: lunedì 16 novembre 2015 09:19 To: Julien Meuric Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] 答复: Poll on Adoption of draft-minei-pce-associ

Re: [Pce] Broadband Forum Liaison: Achieving Packet Network Optimization using DWDM Interfaces

continued communication on this important area of optical networking. Best Regards, Daniele Ceccarelli & Fatai Zhang - CCAMP Working Group Chairs Jonathan Hardwick, Julien Meuric & Jean-Philippe Vasseur - PCE Working Group Chairs Vishnu Pavan Beeram & Lou Berger - TEA

[Pce] IETF 97 - Joint YANG session slot request

Hello everyone, At the IETF 97 the joint YANG session (TEAS, MPLS, PCE, CCAMP) will be hosted by CCAMP. The session is scheduled for Monday Nov 14th (15:50-17:50 - Monday Afternoon session II). If you are willing to present a draft please request a slot using the link below identifying if yo

Re: [Pce] IETF 97 - CCAMP slot request

Hi all, A friendly reminder. Please note that the deadline for asking a slot for the CCAMP session or the joint YANG session is TODAY. Thanks Daniele From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Oscar González de Dios Sent: mercoledì 19 ottobre 2016 10:48 To: CCAMP Subject: [CCAMP]

[Pce] CCAMP and JOINT YANG session agenda @IETF97

Hi all, the first version of the agenda for the CCAMP session and the Joint YANG session is available at the following link. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/agenda/agenda-97-ccamp-01 Please let us have your comments Thanks MPLS, PCE, TEAS and CCAMP (chairs and secretaries)

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

on't understand the value of asking for it and remembering about it. BR Daniele From: Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) [mailto:michael.sch...@nokia.com] Sent: giovedì 3 novembre 2016 14:45 To: Igor Bryskin ; Daniele Ceccarelli ; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org) ; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

or Bryskin [mailto:igor.brys...@huawei.com] Sent: giovedì 3 novembre 2016 15:04 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) ; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org) ; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org) ; m...@ietf.org Subject: RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Re: [Pce] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-busibel-teas-yang-path-computation-00

Makes sense. Cheers Daniele From: Igor Bryskin [mailto:igor.brys...@huawei.com] Sent: giovedì 3 novembre 2016 15:35 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE) ; CCAMP (cc...@ietf.org) ; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG (t...@ietf.org) ; m...@ietf.org Subject: RE: http://tools.ietf.org/html

[Pce] Slides for Joint YANG session

The joint YANG session will be on Monday and as of Sunday afternoon 8 slide decks out of 12 are still missing !! If you sent the slides and you don't see them in the meeting material (sorry...) please send a ping, otherwise please have them sent ASAP. Oscar is not here at this time, please remem

[Pce] IETF 97 - Minutes

Hi all, the first draft of the CCAMP and joint YANG session minutes is now available at the following link: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-ccamp-00.htm Thanks a lot to Italo, Haomian and Yoji for the help with notes taking. Thanks Daniele, Fatai, Oscar _

Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-association-policy

Support, BR Daniele > -Original Message- > From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leeyoung > Sent: venerdì 25 novembre 2016 12:59 > To: Julien Meuric > Cc: pce@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll for Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-association-policy > > Support, > > Young >

Re: [Pce] [Teas] [mpls] IETF 97 - Minutes

Hi Xufeng, Thanks for the note. Minutes fixed. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-ccamp-01.htm BR Daniele From: Teas [mailto:teas-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xufeng Liu Sent: martedì 29 novembre 2016 22:56 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; 'CCAMP' Cc: m...@iet

[Pce] draft-ietf-pce-wson-rwa-ext-05 - Shepherd review

Dear authors, WG, i carried the shepherd review of this document, please find below some comments and issues that should be fixed as part of the WG last call. BR Daniele - ID nits: Summary: 14 errors (**), 0 flaws (~~), 17 warnings (==), 2 comments (--). Please note that there i

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-09

Yes/support Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 9:24 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwi...@ietf.org; pce-c

Re: [Pce] [CCAMP] FlexE side meeting

...and the agenda >> The agenda will be: >> >> 1. FlexE background and origins: Haomian Zheng >> 2. FlexE Technology Deep Dive: Iftekhar Hussain >> 3. FlexE in the IETF:Mach Chen >> 4. Open Mic From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-boun...@ietf.org]

[Pce] FlexE side meeting

Hi everyone, a reminder for the FlexE side meeting and the link to Meetecho: When: Tuesday 18:45-20:15 Room: Zurich B Remote participation - Meetecho: http://www.meetecho.com/ietf98/CCAMP-FlexE BR Daniele, Nic, Loa ___ Pce mailing list Pce@ietf.org htt

[Pce] FlexE side meeting

http://recs.conf.meetecho.com/Playout/watch.jsp?recording=IETF98_CCAMP_FlexE&chapter=chapter_1 Thanks Daniele & Nic From: Daniele Ceccarelli Sent: martedì 28 marzo 2017 12:10 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; pce@ietf.org; TEAS WG ; routing-discuss...@ietf.org; m...@ietf.org; cc...@ietf.org Cc: Ignas Bagdonas ; dr

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02

Hi Jon, yes/support BR Daniele From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: martedì 25 aprile 2017 18:26 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-dhody-pce-applicability-a...@ietf.org Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-dhody-pce-applicability-actn-02 All, This

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-00.txt

maggio 2017 17:26 To: Francesco Lazzeri ; Daniele Ceccarelli ; Young Lee Subject: New Version Notification for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-00.txt A new version of I-D, draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw-00.txt has been successfully submitted by Daniele Ceccarelli and posted to the IETF repository

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce

Yes/Support BR Daniele From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: giovedì 1 giugno 2017 14:25 To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org; draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org Subject: Poll for adoption: draft-dhodylee-pce-stateful-hpce All, This is the start of a

Re: [Pce] Poll for adoption: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling-05

Agree with Adrian, i support the adoption of the document. BR Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: venerdì 16 giugno 2017 18:18 To: 'Jonathan Hardwick' ; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-zhuang-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-schedul...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject

Re: [Pce] PCEP as an SDN controller protocol?

Thanks Jon for starting this discussion. I agree with Stephane when saying that the decision to turn PCEP into an SDN protocol was already taken a while ago (with the active PCE IMHO). What are the pros and cons of this approach, let me share some loud thinking: * It could be the SBI solut

Re: [Pce] Can we make a non-backwards compatible change to draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type?

+1 I know you don’t like +1 that much, but there isn’t that much to add. In Italian we’d say “salva capra e cavoli” (it saves goat and cabbage)…meaning it’s backward compatible and not ugly 😊 Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: lunedì 24 luglio

Re: [Pce] PCEP as an SDN controller protocol?

with you. Cheers Daniele From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: martedì 25 luglio 2017 11:36 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; pce@ietf.org Cc: Jonathan Hardwick ; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: PCEP as an SDN controller protocol? Hi Daniele, [Operator hat on.] I agree on several

[Pce] draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw - follow up

Dear WG, Just a follow up on the comments made against the residual bw draft: (see minutes) 3.1<https://tools.ietf.org/wg/pce/minutes?item=minutes-99-pce-00.html#section-3.1>. PCEP Extensions for Residual Bandwidth (Daniele Ceccarelli, 10 min) [45/120] draft-l

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity: relaxing constraint

Hi Stephane, definitely needed. My opinion is that a way to say that a constraint was relaxed is very useful. As you said there are different types of constraints that can be relaxed, e.g. diversity or a TE bound. I would make the TLV as generic as possible and maybe define multiple sub-TLV (or

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity: relaxing constraint

On everything 😊 From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com [mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com] Sent: lunedì 13 novembre 2017 16:41 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity: relaxing constraint Hi Daniele, Thanks for your feedback. If we go to a

[Pce] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07

comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07 Reviewer: Daniele Ceccarelli Review Date: 2018-01-10 IETF LC End Date: date-if-known Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: I have some minor

Re: [Pce] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-07

Hi Jon, thanks for considering my feedbacks. It’s pointless to reply inline as it would be an OK to all you changes, let’s bundle it here 😊 Thanks, Daniele From: Jonathan Hardwick [mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com] Sent: lunedì 15 gennaio 2018 15:43 To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; (rtg

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03

Yes/support BR Daniele From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: martedì 20 febbraio 2018 14:48 To: Jonathan Hardwick Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-li-pce-pcep-flows...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-flowspec-03 Yes

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

Yes/support. I think the topic is very relevant for the industry in these days and this draft is a good starting point for WG to work on. BR Daniele -- Forwarded message - From: Jonathan Hardwick mailto:jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com>> Date: Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 8:27 PM Subj

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-lazzeri-pce-residual-bw

Hi Julien, Thanks for starting this. I believe the feedbacks collected after the first discussions significantly improved the scope of the draft, making it narrow, simple and straight forward. This is a minor extension to PCEP that allows a better exchange of path computation results, particularly

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

Hi Julien, WG, I've reviewed the document as well. in my opinion it is a good shape and ready to be moved forward. BR Daniele Il 18 Dic 2018 7:52 AM, "Chengli (Cheng Li)" ha scritto: Hi WG, Yes, support. I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication. Thanks, Cheng -

Re: [Pce] Replacing Jon as PCE Co-Chair

Thanks a lot Jon…double thumb up!...and good luck for the future. Good luck also to Dhruv, you’ll need it…and you deserve to take this role for the excellent work done so far as secretary and WG member (driver). Adrian, you’re starting the second round? What’s next…CCAMP chair and RTG AD ? …

Re: [Pce] Regarding IPR on draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid-03

Hi Adrian, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: den 5 februari 2019 15:05 To: leeyo...@huawei.com; zhenghaom...@huawei.com; ramon.casel...@cttc.es; Ricard Vilalta ; Daniele Ceccarelli ; Francesco Lazzer

Re: [Pce] Checking for IPR on draft-ietf-pce-applicability-actn

Hi Adrian, "No, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft" Thanks, Daniele -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel Sent: den 8 februari 2019 12:38 To: dhruv.i...@gmail.com; leeyo...@huawei.com; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Checking for IPR on draf

Re: [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-lee-pce-flexible-grid

Hi Adrian, Yes i support the adoption of the document. This is needed to complete the work done by CCAMP on flexi grid. Thanks, Daniele -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Italo Busi Sent: den 11 februari 2019 17:10 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Adoption poll for draft-le

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce

Hi Adrian, WG, I'm not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft. BR Daniele -Original Message- From: Leeyoung Sent: den 13 mars 2019 14:53 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-h...@ietf.org; s.avantika.avant...@gmail.com; Zhangxian (Xian) ; udayasreere...@gmail.com Cc: p

Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06

Same here...and I couldn’t explain it better than Ramon. BR Daniele From: Pce On Behalf Of Ramon Casellas Sent: den 1 april 2019 09:46 To: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Reminder: Working Group last call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-hpce-06 Hi all Apologies for the delay in my r

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Hi, No i’m not aware of any IPR. BR Daniele From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: den 15 juli 2019 11:27 To: younglee...@gmail.com; zhang.x...@huawei.com; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR poll on draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association Hi Authors, In preparation

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Yes/Support. BR Daniele From: Young Lee Sent: den 14 juli 2019 22:27 To: adr...@olddog.co.uk Cc: pce@ietf.org; draft-leedhody-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org Subject: Re: PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association Yes/Support. Young (co-author) On Sun, Jul 14, 2019, 8

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Hi, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. BR Daniele From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: den 5 december 2019 18:13 To: Huaimo Chen ; Zhuangyan (Yan) ; bill...@huawei.com; Daniele Ceccarelli Cc: pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling

Support as well, I believe the draft is now ready for publication. Thanks, Daniele (co-author) From: Pce On Behalf Of Xufeng Liu Sent: den 12 december 2019 19:56 To: Zhangxian (Xian) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-lsp-scheduling Support for publ