On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Only problem is, it's not clear how the assembly should refer to local
variables (from and to). I was reviewing this article...
I may misunderstand something here, but I thought you target sparc not
x86.
Yes; the document is
It would be easy enough to test---just disable the cpp case that uses
__cpuid().
I cannot. GCC supports ATT sytax only. Visual C does not support any inline
assembly in 64 bit mode: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/wbk4z78b.aspx
(And I can confirm that is true). However, we might be
Hi,
Well, our audience here isn't just people following the list today, but
also people Googling for this information years from now. Hello readers in
2017! :-)
still feels out of scope. SourceForge provides some kind of forum, perhaps we
could use that:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Could you split the patch into two:
Okay, I'll work on that.
1) Older solaris support
I think an #if based soultion could work here:
#if defined(old_solaris)
asm for old solaris
#else
original code
#endif
Only problem is, it's not
Hi Daniel,
Only problem is, it's not clear how the assembly should refer to local
variables (from and to). I was reviewing this article...
I may misunderstand something here, but I thought you target sparc not x86.
Why not provide an Intel-syntax equivalent of the ATT assembly instead of
an
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the patch! Would it be a problem, if I would land it after the next
pcre release? We focus on fixes now, and this is kind of a new feature.
* Added defined(__INTEL_COMPILER) to the appropriate conditionals
* Moved the 64-bit _MSC_VER case up so that this is used in
I've encountered some further issues in building PCRE with JIT support in
some less-than-usual environments.
One is using the Intel compiler (icc) on 64-bit Linux. Normally, it
#defines __GNUC__ and compiles the same code as GCC, but in my case, the
compatibility was causing me trouble and I
