On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
PCRE has only a few developers. When somebody does a change, he can
manually check the bots after his commit (he should btw). This
approach works well with other open-source projects where I am
involved.
When I agreed to sending the messages to the
p...@hermes.cam.ac.uk wrote:
I have no strong views - let's see if anybody else on this list does.
Just for the record, I just released a second batch of these messages from
yesterday evening.
Graeme (also not on pcre-dev).
--
## List details at
Hi Zoltan,
Am 12.01.2014 um 05:47 schrieb Zoltán Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu:
At the moment I have four builders configured (sparc32, sparv64, i386, amd64)
and on each fail an email is sent. The build is triggered on each commit.
So when a systematic error happening in all builds is
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
At the moment I have four builders configured (sparc32, sparv64, i386, amd64)
and on each fail an email is sent. The build is triggered on each commit.
So when a systematic error happening in all builds is encountered it may
look like a flood. I
On Sun, 12 Jan 2014, Dagobert Michelsen wrote:
Should I disable it for now to get the other issues sorted out first
or do you immediately want to take a look? I could also make another
set of builders, one with JIT and one without JIT if it helps.
The other issue seems to be the french locale
Looks like you are collecting the full set of list moderators (although
unlike the others I am on the list, but purely as a lurker).
I've approved another batch of messages through, and reset the
moderation flag so further messages (unless they get caught for content
or size reasons) will go
Hi,
Undefinedfirst referenced
symbol in file
pcre_jit_exec pcre_jit_test-pcre_jit_test.o
pcre16_jit_exec pcre_jit_test-pcre_jit_test.o
pcre32_jit_exec pcre_jit_test-pcre_jit_test.o
Hi,
How about making another list for such automatic messages? They
clutter a bit this list (which is supposed to be for discussing
development).
I agree that this list is mostly for porting questions, reporting bugs and
requesting features.
PCRE has only a few developers. When somebody does a
Hi Zoltan,
Am 12.01.2014 um 17:50 schrieb Zoltán Herczeg hzmes...@freemail.hu:
How about making another list for such automatic messages? They
clutter a bit this list (which is supposed to be for discussing
development).
I agree that this list is mostly for porting questions, reporting bugs
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014, Phil Pennock wrote:
There were a bunch of messages from build...@opencsw.org in the pcre-dev
queue; on balance, it looked like they probably belonged, so I did let
them out, but I did not clear the moderate flag.
It was I that suggested these messages be sent to pcre-dev,
Folks of pcre-dev,
There were a bunch of messages from build...@opencsw.org in the pcre-dev
queue; on balance, it looked like they probably belonged, so I did let
them out, but I did not clear the moderate flag.
I'm not on your list so don't know what's normal. Should I clear the
moderate flag
11 matches
Mail list logo
