On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> I guess it's a benign mistake? LICENCE says that PCRE2 is BSD. :)
Oh, gosh, how did that get there? The PCRE1 COPYING file just contains
this:
Please see the file LICENCE in the PCRE distribution for licensing
details.
The PCRE2 file
>The biggest problem is having this working (and claim as supported)
>amongst the huge number of compilers and platforms that PCRE2 runs on.
>That's not an easy task.
this is exactly my problem :)
Perhaps we could start by supporting some platforms, and gradually cover more
with the community
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
> Perhaps we could start by supporting some platforms, and gradually cover more
> with the community help. I heard that asm volatile forces GCC (and perhaps
> clang) to disable moving instructions around such asm
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1770
Bug ID: 1770
Summary: PCRE fails to detect a circular reference of some
numbered patterns
Product: PCRE
Version: 10.20 (PCRE2)
Hardware: x86
OS: All
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Zoltán Herczeg wrote:
> I understand the basic principles, but I cannot judge the side effects and
> limitations (CPU/OS/compiler) of those changes. It would be better to discuss
> proposed patches and land the best solution.
The biggest
I guess it's a benign mistake? LICENCE says that PCRE2 is BSD. :)
Cheers,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev