Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 COPYING file is the GPL3 license

2016-01-05 Thread ph10
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > I guess it's a benign mistake? LICENCE says that PCRE2 is BSD. :) Oh, gosh, how did that get there? The PCRE1 COPYING file just contains this: Please see the file LICENCE in the PCRE distribution for licensing details. The PCRE2 file

Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 and thread safety of jit compilation?

2016-01-05 Thread Zoltán Herczeg
>The biggest problem is having this working (and claim as supported) >amongst the huge number of compilers and platforms that PCRE2 runs on. >That's not an easy task. this is exactly my problem :) Perhaps we could start by supporting some platforms, and gradually cover more with the community

Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 and thread safety of jit compilation?

2016-01-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Zoltán Herczeg wrote: > Perhaps we could start by supporting some platforms, and gradually cover more > with the community help. I heard that asm volatile forces GCC (and perhaps > clang) to disable moving instructions around such asm

[pcre-dev] [Bug 1770] New: PCRE fails to detect a circular reference of some numbered patterns

2016-01-05 Thread admin
https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1770 Bug ID: 1770 Summary: PCRE fails to detect a circular reference of some numbered patterns Product: PCRE Version: 10.20 (PCRE2) Hardware: x86 OS: All

Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 and thread safety of jit compilation?

2016-01-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:22 AM, Zoltán Herczeg wrote: > I understand the basic principles, but I cannot judge the side effects and > limitations (CPU/OS/compiler) of those changes. It would be better to discuss > proposed patches and land the best solution. The biggest

[pcre-dev] PCRE2 COPYING file is the GPL3 license

2016-01-05 Thread Giuseppe D'Angelo
I guess it's a benign mistake? LICENCE says that PCRE2 is BSD. :) Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev