Bugs item #1595028, was opened at 2006-11-12 07:03
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by eighthave
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=1595028&group_id=55736
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
On Nov 18, 2006, at 8:07 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Am 18.11.2006 um 22:16 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
true. But they ar
Am 18.11.2006 um 22:16 schrieb Mathieu Bouchard:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be
t
On 11/18/06, Mathieu Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into something that
> has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be true. But they are
> talking about vectorizing loops, it may n
On Nov 18, 2006, at 4:16 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into
something that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be
true. But they are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into something that
has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be true. But they are
talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be the best thing to
vectorize, but there are definitely ve
> I really doubt that the gcc devs put a lot of effort into something
> that has no effect. Perhaps not for Pd, that may be true. But they
> are talking about vectorizing loops, it may not be the best thing to
> vectorize, but there are definitely vectorizable loops in Pd.
the problem is no
